this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2026
655 points (99.2% liked)

Technology

87624 readers
4123 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Logical_Error@fosstodon.org 0 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

@sanitation same with postmarketos and alpine :P

pmOS: ban all AI
alpine: no need to indicate if AI was used or not (last i saw, maybe still in discussion still)

[–] sanitation@lemmy.today 1 points 45 minutes ago

tbh I dont support ban. I think they should ban ai publicly only to avoid copyright and lawsuits issues from AI but then use it to produce linux based android alternative quickly.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 37 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

The article is good, but the headline seems clickbaity:

  • Debian is discussing requirements about hosting software with LLM generated code in their repos, and disclosure of that.

  • "Ubuntu embraces AI" is talking about putting ML inference engines in their repos... which, ironically, are largely human written.

These are two completely seperate issues. And TBH its not clear how Debian is approaching inference engines or how Ubuntu is approaching disclosure.

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

As always, the actual story is in the comments. Thank you for the summary.

[–] ki4jgt@feddit.org 14 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago) (1 children)

I remember when they wanted to unify mobile phones and desktop computers, with a singular online storage account and DE that changed when you plugged your phone into a monitor. That shit was crazy.

[–] selflock@lemmy.world 15 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] baatliwala@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

The best vision for that was unironically Microsoft’s, but by that time they had started the enshittification with Windows 10

[–] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 72 points 14 hours ago (4 children)

Ubuntu: The Windows of Linux.

[–] sudoer777@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 hours ago

I thought Ubuntu was the macOS of Linux and the Windows of Linux is Omarchy

[–] bss03@infosec.pub 4 points 8 hours ago

I think technically that might have been Lindows.

[–] Batmorous@lemmy.world 14 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

5-10 years from now they will pull their Windows 11-equivalent crash and burn move

[–] COASTER1921@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 hours ago

With RAM prices what they are the push for snaps may already be this... On memory constrained systems snaps already have a huge performance penalty.

[–] orochi02@feddit.org 11 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Canonical the Microsoft linux

[–] noahm@lemmy.world 3 points 4 hours ago

No, that would be Azure Linux

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

seems like every consumer-friendly version of anything is shoehorning ai into it. stupid

load more comments
view more: next ›