this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2026
70 points (98.6% liked)

Showerthoughts

43578 readers
232 users here now

A "Showerthought" is a simple term used to describe the thoughts that pop into your head while you're doing everyday things like taking a shower, driving, or just daydreaming. The most popular seem to be lighthearted clever little truths, hidden in daily life.

Here are some examples to inspire your own showerthoughts:

Rules

  1. All posts must be showerthoughts
  2. The entire showerthought must be in the title
  3. No politics
    • If your topic is in a grey area, please phrase it to emphasize the fascinating aspects, not the dramatic aspects. You can do this by avoiding overly politicized terms such as "capitalism" and "communism". If you must make comparisons, you can say something is different without saying something is better/worse.
    • A good place for politics is c/politicaldiscussion
  4. Posts must be original/unique
  5. Adhere to Lemmy's Code of Conduct and the TOS

If you made it this far, showerthoughts is accepting new mods. This community is generally tame so its not a lot of work, but having a few more mods would help reports get addressed a little sooner.

Whats it like to be a mod? Reports just show up as messages in your Lemmy inbox, and if a different mod has already addressed the report, the message goes away and you never worry about it.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

If you pay 1% for one house, someone with 2 houses should pay 2%, and a company with 2000 homes should pay 2000%

That would make it increasingly difficult for mega companies to buy up everything and torture the housing market

top 15 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TranquilTurbulence@lemmy.zip 4 points 22 minutes ago

They would use proxy owners to stay at 1%. Maybe every employee of the corporation could be “an owner” for taxation purposes.

[–] psx_crab@lemmy.zip 3 points 23 minutes ago

pass it down to renter

[–] EnsignWashout@startrek.website 12 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Luckily for the billionaires they don't own any homes, their homes are part of a complex companies, or some bullshit.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 5 points 48 minutes ago

All too true - laws are for people who can't afford lawyers.

[–] rafoix@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Home owners would complain about property values because they care about unrealized gains more than a working economy.

[–] Godort@lemmy.ca 16 points 50 minutes ago (1 children)

Im a homeowner and I want my property value to plummet.

I have no intention of selling this place in the foreseeable future, so all those unrealized gains just makes my insurance and taxes cost more.

[–] vrek@programming.dev 1 points 7 minutes ago

Few random gun shots into the ground... Random grafetti... Invite some black/brown friends over...

Get creative and you can lower your property value

[–] Evil_Incarnate@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I'd go further (current flat rate)^(number of houses owned -1)

[–] LifeInMultipleChoice@lemmy.world 4 points 49 minutes ago* (last edited 49 minutes ago)

Meh I wouldn't go exponentially. I would go 1=1. 2=5-7 depending on size and availability, 3 = 20-150. 4=1500+

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 3 points 49 minutes ago

To an extent "Homestead Exemption" can do this, if the exemption is a significant chunk of the taxable value - which it has been at some times (my first house's HX was 50% of its taxable value), and not so much at other times (we're at about 10% now)....

So, if you've got 50% homestead exemption, you only get that on your first home and you pay double taxes on others. But, if you're playing in the 10% bracket that's basically in the noise.

[–] applebusch@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 hour ago

we should break out the guillotine while we're at it and solve the rich cunt problem

[–] wraekscadu@vargar.org 1 points 1 hour ago (3 children)

Or just ban mega corps from buying housing stock. It's not difficult to enforce.

That being said, at least where I'm from, the biggest cause for expensive housing was bad zoning laws + suddenly increased demand due to immigration.

The government laxed zoning laws while (seemingly) temporarily reducing immigration. This has caused housing prices to drop quite a lot

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 6 minutes ago

What’s a mega corp? Lots of billionaires don’t have all their money in one big company, they spread it out over many small companies. They have friends and family members and trusts to spread the ownership around.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 2 points 47 minutes ago

Or just ban mega corps from buying housing stock. It’s not difficult to enforce.

When the mega corps own the legislature and the courts it's pretty difficult, when they own the executive branch then they de-facto will not have anything enforced upon them.

[–] Lumberjacked@piefed.social 1 points 30 minutes ago

Me too! I’m in Austin