this post was submitted on 14 Sep 2026
112 points (100.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

17737 readers
324 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 54 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (2 children)

Well Ed fucking sucks. This is more than just passively looking away. Silencing criticism of a genocide makes you actively complicit.

History will remember people like this.

[–] hOrni@lemmy.world 35 points 1 hour ago

And Macklemore is cool. He might be cringy, but he's genuine and I like him. Saw him live once and it was one of the best shows I ever saw.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 11 points 1 hour ago (2 children)

It's not Ed, it's the industry...

Like Macklemore said himself:

What happened to the artist? What d'you got to say?

If I was on a label, you could drop me today

I'd be fine with it 'cause the heart fed my page

I want a ceasefire, fuck a response from Drake (Woo)

Macklemore is truly independent, he can say whatever the fuck he wants.

Ed has "his own label" but it's owned by Warner, so if they tell him to do something, he has to do it.

There's only a handful of major labels, but they "give" popular artists sub-labels to cultivate an illusion of diversity.

Epitaph is one of "biggest small labels" and they even pull the same shit, although I'm not gonna complain Tim Armstrong gets more autonomy....

[–] isVeryLoud@lemmy.ca 5 points 57 minutes ago

I guess Ed Sheeran was... Warned.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 4 points 51 minutes ago (1 children)

That's a distinction without a difference. Of course the label were a factor here, likely the deciding one. But that just makes the label culpable without absolving Ed from it. They all fucking suck, but Ed is still the one doing shows. He could/should have made Macklemore a condition of contuining to perform.

I get what you are saying, this choice wasn't made by Ed alone. But at the end of the day, all I see is a genocide being covered up. It doesn't matter if we blame the artist or the label more, all of them are complicit in silencing criticism. They should all be addressed, called out and remembered for their active inaction.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 1 points 33 minutes ago

The choice was:

  1. Go along with Macklemore getting removed.

  2. Get removed along with Macklemore and if lucky get dropped.

What is more likely is the label keeps you on the current contract, but intentionally savatoges you to make an example out of. Even if they let him out of his contract, he's a big name but going independent would be a massive pay cut.

Like, without a label behind him, he's not headlining anything. His best bet is to get picked up as an opener like Macklemore, and obviously he could get dropped just as easily.

Absolutely nothing would change.

What needs to change is breaking up giant corporations so a handful of CEOs don't have this much power. That would actually solve shit.

I get what you are saying, this choice wasn’t made by Ed alone

You don't get what I'm saying, because I'm saying Ed had no say on if Macklemore would stay. He could just have thrown his own career away too out of solidarity when it wouldn't produce meaningful change.

Which is a very different choice.

[–] Cheese_man@lemmy.world 29 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

What did they think he was going to do? Palestine has been Macklemore's whole thing for a few years, now. When they booked him in the first place, did they think he'd just play Thrift Shop 5 times a night or something?

[–] garbagebagel@lemmy.world 5 points 52 minutes ago

I think they probably risked it because someone on Ed's team (or Ed himself) likes him and they were hoping there would not be as much pushback or that it would not lead to the label or whoever their bosses are to be assholes like this. Seems like they were just trying to push the envelope and weren't successful unfortunately.

[–] JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 hours ago

Yesterday I had no opinion on either. Today I have a higher opinion of Macklemore than Ed Sheeran.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 hour ago
  1. Apparently it was an ultimatum and there was a contract

  2. Had he chosen not to go on, the vocal people would say he was afraid to go on after Macklemore said Palestine.