this post was submitted on 16 Sep 2026
206 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

88122 readers
3587 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
L3s@lemmy.world
enu@lemmy.world
technopagan@lemmy.world
L4s@lemmy.world
L3s@hackingne.ws
206
Destroying Humanity Is Against the Law. Don’t wait for a mass-extinction event before holding AI developers accountable. (www.theatlantic.com)
submitted 2 days ago by GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works to c/technology@lemmy.world
18 comments fedilink hide all child comments
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] yesman@lemmy.world 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

[–] Onyxonblack@sopuli.xyz 34 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Pretty sure destroying humanity IS NOT against the law. There are no laws saying any such thing..

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Especially given that you can only be prosecuted for a crime after you've actually committed it.

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Is there a law against attempted destruction of humanity? Like attempted murder?

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Why would there be? There isn't a Nobel Prize for Attempted Chemistry.

[–] ContactClosure@lemmus.org 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That has to be the dumbest response I've seen all day. Kudos.

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 6 points 1 day ago

Thanks, but I can't claim credit - it's a Simpsons quote (Sideshow Bob complaining about being charged with attempted murder for trying to kill Bart).

[–] CADmonkey@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bob? Is that you?

[–] KairuByte@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Kelsey?

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 4 points 2 days ago

That sounds oddly like crime against humanity, of which the Rome Statute covers. Specifically extermination or "other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health"

[–] grue@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do you mean, "wait for?" We're already in one!

[–] Sibshops@feddit.cl 16 points 2 days ago

Didn't the supreme court rule that climate change wasn't against the law?

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Those in power determine the law.

[–] CIA_chatbot@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Nah, meatbags had a good run. Time to call it a day

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 8 hours ago

Cool it HK

[–] frongt@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 days ago

Is it really though? Murder is, obviously, as are weapons of mass destruction. Same with genocide. But if you were actually able to kill all humans with the push of a button, would there be a specific crime for that act?

Obviously there would be no one to prosecute, and if you included yourself you'd be dead, so it would be moot.