this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2026
371 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

88098 readers
3571 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.wtf/post/49143200

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/71629767

This is unacceptable. And I’m sick of all the fucking workarounds to maintain basic privacy.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Bubbaonthebeach@lemmy.ca 14 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I remember when consumers had power because they refused to buy things. Tech has power because no one will go without. Don't buy a new phone, computer, tablet, game. Make do with what you already have. Stop approving of everything Tech is doing by buying all their stuff regardless of the enshitification and spyware. Learn how to use cash again or whatever is necessary to stop empowering Tech.

[–] GolfFoxtrotLima@sh.itjust.works 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

buy refurbished if possible

[–] ScarlettStunningSpace@lemmy.blahaj.zone 30 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

I'm burned out being online anymore. It was fun and now it's not. It's just stressful

[–] NarrativeBear@lemmy.world 19 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

I just run my own internet now, completely restricted to my own hosted websites and services. With hookers and blackjack.

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 4 points 11 hours ago

Actually, forget the internet

[–] Dozzi92@lemmy.world 8 points 16 hours ago

I think all this regulation will make the internet small again. The pendulum will swing away from this terrible direction we've gone in. I'm okay with it. Let them ruin it. I know that there will still be places to go.

[–] dan1101@lemmy.world 5 points 17 hours ago

It seems bleak but there are millions of sites and many of them aren't going to add age checks.

[–] corvide077@lemmy.zip 5 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

What’s the consequences look like of nanny-state-ing everyone who buys spoon-fed mainstream products, yet allowing an out for people “smart” enough to configure their own systems with Linux/open source? (“Smart”, I don’t have a better word for people who don’t require government parenting) This is of course making the wild assumption there are in fact people who need the government to parent them/their own children, of undetermined proportion of the population. The more cynical take being it has never been about the children, but I’d like to explore the absurdity that it could be. E.g., allowing an out surpresses pushback from the motivated, where the resistance-path-of-least-resistance is personal exemption

[–] herculeskan@lemmy.zip 5 points 13 hours ago

I hope I. The future, laptops bring Linux by default

[–] neotheone@lemmy.world 21 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Stallman calls this “Service as a Software Substitute” (SaaSS): users operate weak “thin clients” while the real computing happens on someone else’s server. He argues this creates dependence and oppression because users cannot control, inspect, modify, or reliably access the software handling their data. He develops this argument in “What Does That Server Really Serve?” (2010).

[–] natecox@programming.dev 3 points 11 hours ago
[–] Wakko@hell.cloud 35 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

Y'all just cannot fathom how completely most people do not care until it directly impacts them personally.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

Shit even when it does impact them directly they still do nothing but accept it, while whining about it.

[–] corvide077@lemmy.zip 4 points 13 hours ago

Meanwhile the French

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 1 points 11 hours ago

People need to teach their kids about empathy

[–] Fedditor385@lemmy.world 32 points 1 day ago (4 children)

You can't demand anything from open source becasue I can just change the demands myself. Linux is free from this nonsense.

[–] WhyJiffie@sh.itjust.works 9 points 18 hours ago

only until device attestation does not exist on the web. google has already tried to make it a thing, and the public backlash only caused them to continue development in chrome on android

[–] chaospatterns@lemmy.world 14 points 23 hours ago

What I'm worried about is whether we'll be able to connect to anything else. With open source, sure you can remove age gates, but with device attestation coming to a device near you, you won't be he able to log into your favorite game or website.

Its already like that with CloudFlare randomly blocking my Firefox on Linux install occasionally.

[–] douglasg14b@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, and how many people are going to go change the Linux kernel for their distro to rip out age verification ad-hoc?

Let's just focus on the <0.001% of the population who might have the knowledge and skills to do so. How many of that absolutely minute portion are capable of spending the time and effort to achieve that?

It's extremely naive to expand your superiority complex to assume that you won't be affected by this while ignoring almost everyone else that will.

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 8 points 18 hours ago

Some distro from a country outside the Epstein class' jurisdiction will do that for them.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] badbytes@lemmy.world 10 points 22 hours ago (11 children)

Or just use a sensible OS that you control.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Data hoard enough shit to get you through however many decades you have left and get off grid.

That's literally the only solution that's going to be left.

[–] NekoKoneko@lemmy.world 16 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Not sure that is going to be a solution either. Have you seen HDD prices lately?

In the end, corporate buyers are cornering the market for self-use technology. Once the consumer market is gone, and habits change, there may be no going back since a new subscription market will be built and self-perpetuating. So I hope the AI bubble pops before that happens.

[–] dihutenosa@piefed.social 1 points 16 hours ago

Have you seen the capacity of a phone with cracked screen, lately? Slap Syncthing on it, if you can't be bothered with PostmarketOS, for a cheap, low-power, solar compatible backup solution or a Kiwix server or something. I ran an email server on one for years. People toss out amazing things these times.

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 116 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Nice of them to push everyone to Linux.

[–] DFX4509B@lemmy.wtf 55 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Not gonna matter when apps and services start blocking Linux, or even worse, should this shit creep up the chain to the ISP level and should ISPs start requiring an Apple, Google, or MS OS just to get online to begin with.

[–] Kaligalis@lemmy.world 5 points 18 hours ago

People will just pretend to be on Windows and give whoever asks fabricated information that looks legit (probably because it's reverse engineered from an actual Windows). FOSS is way stronger than you think.

[–] Dadifer@lemmy.world 2 points 16 hours ago

Aren't most servers running linux?

[–] adespoton@lemmy.ca 62 points 1 day ago (20 children)

That’s when I buy a LoRa array and a ham license.

The thing about the Internet is that anyone can be an ISP and any devices can be networked. If consumer ISPs become gatekeepers, we can network without them. And then we can tunnel encrypted data over the official devices that can’t be fully locked down.

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 4 points 13 hours ago

Enjoy your upload/download speeds in the kbps on a clear day...

I like the way you're thinking, but realistically that won't replace the internet. You might be able to run lightweight messenger apps and forums that way, but updating software? Downloading media? Not likely.

People in densely populated areas can probably daisy-chain intranets over wifi to form makeshift mesh networks, but transferring data over distances like if you're maintaining a software repo mirror would require some other solution. The best I can think of is physically running USB drives between different server locations to keep the mirrors up-to-date.

Of course you can use the radio to coordinate, like reaching out and telling people where to bring their USB to get a copy of your repo. Or getting enough people in one area to mesh their wifi extenders to create an intranet.

load more comments (19 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] axh@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago

If we are adding age verification, can we please accept that AI age should be calculated for each version separately? So the ChatGPT version X is only 2 years old and should only be allowed to watch Teletubbies

load more comments
view more: next ›