this post was submitted on 28 Sep 2026
82 points (89.4% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

70880 readers
239 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

We heartily recommend visiting the free port of freemediaheckyeah (aka FMHY) while you sail the high seas, for all the freshest links the ocean has to offer.

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A while ago a person I know has had a pretty significant issue that could have ended badly.

Thinking back it is a very silly oversight, but I document it here so you don't need to repeat it.

Here is a summary

Before the situation

The user got an Adobe license from their education facility or work, the usual scenario. They were trained on Adobe software so switching is really hard.

It is possible to switch to cracked versions of every app in the creative cloud suite, but before you do that, you need to make sure to remove any trace of the account from your machine!

In practice I would recommend to reinstall Windows. Maybe keep a copy of a very barebones debloatet Win11 install and clone it with Clonezilla.

If you don't go that far, there are many ways Adobe could re-identify you!

The user was logged into their Adobe account in Firefox, which was the crucial mistake here.

About the cracked software

I only recommend to get cracked software from reputable private trackers! I will not give names, but they could be invite-only, so join Signal/SimpleX/Session groups to get in contact with peers.

There is a release group that somehow acquires offline installers of the entire creative suite, which are not available to consumers normally.

They also include scripts to cleanup the system of previous installs, which is very difficult! Even BulkCrapUninstaller or ChrisTitus' WinUtil had issues removing the last pieces of that install. Adobe refuses to distribute sandboxed .appx packages through the Microsoft Store, assume they have invaded your system deeply, run in the background constantly and cannot easily be removed.

Adobe is malware, treat it like that.

The patched release also contains a script that adds a lot of domains and IPs to the system etc/host file, which blocks connections to those domains, which would otherwise make the use of the cracked software impossible. When done right, this is a big privacy improvement! But the IPs and domains could change, the people could have missed some rarely occuring connections etc.

What happened

The user got an email to the mail that they had previously used for their account, greeting them "welcome back strange_username123!"

We assume this username was somehow saved in the cracked versions of the adobe software and might be the same across all installs, which would be very problematic.

How could this happen?

  1. Any app even without internet access can tell the OS to open a link. This link opened in Firefox (hey, at least not Edge /s)
  2. Firefox autofills username and password by default! This means even without any cookies, if you have saved an old login, it will autofill the email which the website can see. Instant breach. You can turn this off in about:preferences#passwordsAutofill
  3. Even without that, Firefox saves all cookies by default, because they don't care enough to develop a nicely usable UI. Website owners can choose how long their cookies should persist and first-party-cookies (adobe.com for adobe.com) will always be accepted. Even with cookie deletion enabled, you might have set adobe.com to the allowlist, because well, you used that in the past! Check in about:preferences#privacy

Some Adobe software had opened this link, which opened in Firefox, which doesnt use the system etc/host file for DNS lookup. Firefox either sent the website that cookie, or autofilled the email, doesn't matter!

We were able to find that link in the browsing history and inspect it. It contains the application version number, language, a long token and other information.

No guarantees!

Even with a wiped browser, Adobe has access to basically the entire system. It could have saved a key somewhere, maybe in the registry, that allows re-linking your identities anywhere.

You can only be sure on a clean install, best inside a VM without any internet access.

all 30 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 73 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

My solution to Adobe is: Gimp, Inkscape, Krita, Kdenlive, etc.

Fuck Adobe malware forever. It’s a bait and switch, and I’m never going to be taking the bait.

[–] exdor@programming.dev 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yes of course. Also these cracked versions can't have internet access so the collaboration stuff is gone.

A Windows VM or maybe even the new bottles soda runtime would be interesting for isolating it, as the invasiveness is just insane.

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Drop Windows all together, I used to be an Apple fan girl so I never really learnt much Windows stuff until highschool and university. I have really realized the planned opsolesence once poop started getting real expensive so I was stretching stuff out as long as possible. Going Linux was the best choice now that crap is so expensive.

[–] exdor@programming.dev 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

There ia aome pirated apple software but way less. Apparently creative cloud works in WINE now so who knows

I should try this, especially the cracked version

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Try Linux and use FOSS, rather than pirating these things, using the services even pirated software benefits the companies.

Knowing how to use a paid service shows that you are more likely going to use it longer.

[–] k0e3@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Yeah, if you don't depend on it for your livelihood, I don't see why anyone should go through all these hoops just to install Adobe's malware. All those apps you mentioned earlier, I find, are perfectly fine for hobbyists.

[–] j5y7@sh.itjust.works 2 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

I would add that if your job requires this software, the company should be the ones providing the hardware and license to run it. If you're freelance, well you're not going to be running pirated software for your business if you're serious anyway. You just build that cost into your bill and write off the expense.

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This entire post just sounds alarming for no reason.. How could this have ended badly? Too many words and no real answer, is this just a buzzfeed article?

[–] exdor@programming.dev 3 points 3 weeks ago

Adobe contacted the user to their completely unprivate email with a weird username that might be shared across all installs of that cracked install.

That means if they wanted they could sue you etc.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Most application data is stored in %AppData% on windows, stuff like preferences, accounts, etc..

It's also entirely possible they just didn't delete the old app data folder before a re-install, as those are normally left behind when uninstalling software, and the new install just picked up the account from there.

[–] exdor@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

The software doesnt have interenet access and doesnt display an account, only Adobe got info about the new username with the old email and some info. It was that link opened by the software. But yes, could have been appdata too, unless BCU cleans that

[–] Reannlegge@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I understand they and their colleges know Adobe, but the world needs to go FOSS faster.

https://youtu.be/T4Upf_B9RLQ

https://youtu.be/d6SPV4GZp-U

[–] exdor@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

Funny video haha

[–] REDACTED@infosec.pub 7 points 3 weeks ago

And what about it? Most software companies could ID cracker software users simply from system info and files because telemetry tends to still work even after crack.

I've used my original adobe account with cracked adobe products for 15 years with 0 issues.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

There's absolutely no reason to use Adobe products. There are much better open source alternatives.

But... If you gonna use Adobe, please pirate it. Don't give them any money.

[–] Souvenir@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Question: would running stuff like this in sandboxie, with internet disabled, prevent these issues?

[–] exdor@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

Yes but my knowledge of W$ndows is limited and I dont think that exists there that much

[–] exdor@programming.dev 1 points 3 weeks ago

Interesting, never heard of this. My Windows experience is very small so I assumed this simply didnt exist

[–] Lupin@lemmy.ml 1 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

I don't know if anyone else mentioned it, but GIMP is free and apparently has a plugin that makes it look and feel exactly like Photoshop. It's entirely legal as well, so Adobe can't do anything about it.

Might be good to know, if you OR your friend wanna use Phototshop, but don't wanna give Adobe any money. Edit: I can't say anything about other Adobe software, though. This is just for Photoshop, as far as I know.

[–] exdor@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

PhotoGimp is not a plugin but a set of config files (including random session files from the dude that made it XD)

One thing missing is algorithmic tools like auto-removal or auto-selecting people and objects. It is not very complex but I dont know a gimp plugin for that

[–] Lupin@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, today I learned. But if both OP and their friend are tech savvy enough to get a cracked copy of Adobe stuff, then they're probably tech savvy enough to get PhotoGimp working. Both are simple things, after all. Plus, if they can't get PhotoGimp working or need the auto-removal or auto-selecting stuff, then I saw someone mention a couple of other alternatives. So they could use one of those, assuming those fit their needs.

[–] exdor@programming.dev 1 points 2 weeks ago

The person is not very techy and trained on adobe malware