this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2026
150 points (93.6% liked)

Today I Learned

31799 readers
436 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From "Uncle John's 'Slightly Irregular' Bathroom Reader"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kieron115@startrek.website 4 points 2 hours ago

The doc told me I was a number 6 triangle =(

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 6 points 5 hours ago

I'm moving to the country, gonna eat a lot of peaches.

[–] Darkard@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

But does a list of all lists contain itself?

[–] scutiger@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

A list of all lists would contain itself. This is just a list of lists and doesn't purport to contain all other lists.

[–] davidgro@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

And even if it did, unless specified it wouldn't be a list of only all lists that don't contain themselves.

[–] hakase@lemmy.zip 11 points 6 hours ago

Those definitely aren't the highest scoring words in Scrabble. They may be the highest scoring using only the seven letters on one tray, but that's only possible on the first play of the game anyway.

Basically, this is the list of highest scoring first plays in Scrabble, which is very different from the actual list of highest scoring words in Scrabble.

[–] crestlessbags@lemmy.world 8 points 8 hours ago

Fun fact: The “Uncle John” who compiles these readers is acclaimed sci-fi writer John Scalzi

[–] Augustiner@lemmy.world 36 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Dracula cannot be killed by sunlight. At least in the Bram Stoker novel. He’s out and about during the day quite a bit. What sunlight does, is keep him from changing shapes. Same for garlic, crucifixes and holy water. He can’t stand them and they weaken him, but nothing in the text says they would be fatal. Silver isn’t even mentioned.

[–] Marthirial@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Sunlight can kill humans, let alone vampires... The detail is how long is the exposure to become lethal.

[–] Augustiner@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago

Anything can technically kill anything if you are pedantic and creative enough. But at that point every statement becomes useless. Especially when a work of fiction is concerned.

[–] probable_possum@leminal.space 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (5 children)

The whole sunlight kills vampire concept is broken/ unclear. Moonlight is reflected sunlight, erm.

Every star is a sun, how must it feel to be pierced by an uncountable - hey, count digit try to count em all - number of tiny suns all the time.

Sunlight is just photons. What makes sunlight special? Which wavelength? The visible or invisible part? Is it about intensity and exposure time? Could we build an anti-vampire torch? Questions, questions.

[–] bequirtle@lemmy.world 16 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Moonlight is literally hundreds of thousands of times weaker than the sun. It makes perfect sense that a vampire could survive in moonlight but not sunlight

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 20 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

And moonlight contains the monkey waves, allowing saiyans to enter their Ozaru state

[–] theneverfox@pawb.social 7 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's more just a motif that a creature of darkness is weakened by the light. It's more that vampires are creatures of the night that you don't have to fear during the day, and it kind of got attached to the lore (along with all sorts of other stuff)

One of my favorite takes on the concept was in the recent Dracula tv series, where basically Dracula actually has no weakness to sunlight, but people have been saying it so long he started to believe it himself. It basically became both a phobia and an obsession, but then at the end he's writhing on the ground expecting pain, then just realizes he's fine

It's interesting because it plays on the concept of losing yourself and self actualization

[–] probable_possum@leminal.space 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

recent Dracula tv series

Is it worth watching?

I think it's more just a motif that a creature of darkness is weakened by the light. It's more that vampires are creatures of the night that you don't have to fear during the day,

Agreed. Personalized human fear of the dangers lurking in the darkness.

[–] imminent_nebula@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 hours ago

Is it worth watching?

I'm guessing they're talking about the 2020 miniseries. IMO, yes, it's worth watching though from what I remember as it jumps through eras it wasn't what I expected lol. Haven't watched it since it came out but I recently rewatched Jonathan Strange & Mr. Norrell so I'm in a bit of a Victorian era vibe and gonna go through this Dracula again.

[–] Augustiner@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, approaching these things with stringed logic breaks them usually. Same goes for vampire reproduction for example. If they turn the people they feed on, how come the world isn’t filled with vampires by now? There should be exponential growth in the number of vampires. Or Dracula needing to sleep on sacred home soil. Does it have to be from his exact crypt? How does he know the limits? Could he dig 1000 meters down and the soil would still work? How does a new vampire find their home turf, if they don’t have a family with a crypt?

You can go on endlessly poking holes, but that just takes the fun out of it. A good level of suspense of disbelief is always needed to enjoy those stories.

[–] probable_possum@leminal.space 3 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

You can go on endlessly poking holes, but that just takes the fun out of it.

I enjoy poking and scratching at the surface of things. It's fun, too. :)

A good level of suspense of disbelief is always needed to enjoy those stories

Agreed. All I need is a good, well played and emotionally touching story. Any movie is just a stage play with patterns like a tension arc, stereotypes and plot devices. Movies are not the reality. But for me there must be some degree of plausibility or scurrility or both. Usually when the movie is boring, emotionally uninvolving or annoying, I start to notice the plot holes and start digging.

And then there are the experts in their field, having a hard time. Police men, pathologists, IT people, who call the director's bullshit. Movie makers who notice and are distracted by patterns and techniques used in the movie. But other people don't mind.

[–] Quicky@piefed.social 4 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

Didn’t they build an anti-vampire torch (and grenades) in the Blade movies?

[–] probable_possum@leminal.space 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

You are right. Good catch.

Vampire and photographer Otto von Chriek (lspace) sometimes practices a form of self-annihilation. It's a slightly different way of burning for the job, I guess.

The inherent problem with being a Vampire Iconographer is that flashes of bright light will cause Otto to shriek in pain, and more often than not reduce him to a pinch of dust on the floor.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 hours ago

Yup! Turns out that it's UV light that they're explosively allergic to, according to those movies

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I refuse to believe that all nine of those city names are more common than Springfield.

Seriously, Centerville?

Additionally, everyone knows there's three Salems: the witch trial one, the other one, and the cat.

[–] spizzat2@lemmy.zip 6 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Yeah, I was looking at that one. I think they're specifically looking at towns, not cities. I can't find anything that gives a concrete distinction between the two labels. It seems that the rules vary by region, and the designation is kind of arbitrary.

However, I did find a list of common city names in the US.

  1. Washington
  2. Springfield
  3. Franklin
  4. Greenville
  5. Bristol
  6. Clinton
  7. Fairview
  8. Salem
  9. Madison
  10. Georgetown
[–] Quilotoa@lemmy.ca 4 points 8 hours ago

Canadians claim the telephone too even though Alexander Graham Bell was British when he invented it in Canada.

[–] addie@feddit.uk 9 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Which messed-up Scrabble board has two Z's in it so that you can spell 'quizzed' or 'jazzily'? You don't get the points if you use a blank...

[–] Ensign_Crab@lemmy.world 4 points 8 hours ago

They still score high with the points from only one z. Especially if you can play them off the end of something and use all 7 tiles.

[–] brem@lemmy.world 13 points 16 hours ago (4 children)

Feel free to add to the lists. Especially the US wars.

[–] jdr@lemmy.ml 3 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

Congress has to declare wars, last time that happened was WW2. The rest are all special operations.

[–] raman_klogius@ani.social 8 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Was about to say, the last list is outdated.

[–] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 4 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago) (1 children)

Isn't the war on Iran officially a "Special Military Operation", like the one in Afghanistan was?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] majster@lemmy.zip 2 points 13 hours ago

Hmm. Syria, Libya, Iran...did I miss anything else after Iraq?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] trolololol@lemmy.world 4 points 12 hours ago

That list of murican wars was too easy. It would be more fun if it was a list of wars started in the 21 century. Or against Asian countries. Need some kind of constraint to make it slightly hard.

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 9 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

from the BRI files

What is it referring?

[–] brem@lemmy.world 12 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

"Bathroom Reader Institute"

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 5 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] brem@lemmy.world 4 points 15 hours ago

No problemo

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 9 points 15 hours ago (8 children)

The Banana Boat Song isn't about the bananas.

[–] PapaStevesy@lemmy.world 8 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

It's more about bananas than Lemon Song is about lemons though, that's fer sher

[–] Phunter@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago

Lemon Song is still about fruit in a sense, but not any literal lemons.

[–] 0ops@piefed.zip 1 points 5 hours ago

I was gonna say...

[–] DagwoodIII@piefed.social 0 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

"Six foot, seven foot, eight foot bunch..."

What do you think is in those bunches?

Hint. It's bananas

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

And yet it's not about the bananas.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] squirrel@cake.kobel.fyi 4 points 13 hours ago

Nice, I love lists.

[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 5 points 14 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)
[–] JohnnyCanuck@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 hours ago

Nope, the answer is on the posted page.

Tap for spoilerRead the fine PRINT 😉

load more comments
view more: next ›