bet he is sorry he wrote that book
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Ask Historians !askhistorians@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
Damn finally
Now to find out who killed Biggie!
"Don't break the law while you breaking the law."
No criminal leader, would openly write and take credit in a book that he off anyone that he actually offed. Him writing that is literally an admission (IMO) that he didn't act alone, aka he was a collaborator with the feds. And need I remind people that book deals is how people get paid?
And if he was a real criminal, and came out as having collaborated, he wouldn't live long.
Guy is retiring. Getting that isolated cell, West Palm Beach, highly publicized, exit stage left.
Hate it when they make examples of people who hurt the rich or famous... Reminds me of the guy who "killed" Mac Miller.
Hate it when they make examples of people who hurt the rich or famous
Make examples of by... checks notes failing to prosecute anyone for three decades?
This is who Tupac was, btw; not your typical "rich and famous" person. I don't think there has been a more political rapper with as much mainstream success.
Also fyi the guy who was just convicted of the murder told police (on tape, in 2008!) that he was offered $1M by Sean "Diddy" Combs to do it.
Tupac was like that because of his mother:
Assata Shakur was a supreme badass
Are you arguing tupac wasn't rich and famous? Are people getting 40 years for a single murder generally?
People get life in prison for murder what are you talking about?
Sorry I'm from Canada, up here he would probably get like 8 months
Sure, you must be from Alberta.
Maybe less if it happened from a car.
Are you arguing tupac wasn’t rich and famous?
No, he was certainly rich (by some definitions) and famous, although at the time of his death his net worth was negative several million (owed to his record label). But did you watch the video I linked?
Are people getting 40 years for a single murder generally?
For first-degree murder, especially for someone with a criminal history as in this case, a sentence of "life without parole" is not uncommon in Nevada.
Almost two murders actually since Shug Knight was driving the car and was also shot.
Honestly... The wrong one died.
Fuck Suge Knight.
Thanks for the correct spelling of "Suge." I knew I was off but didn't think he deserved the effort of googling it.
Tupac was someone who grew up dirt poor, in an incredibly poor and dangerous area, and made his money from being talented and hard working.
People like him are not the enemy.
How did you even get that from what I said
Did he really do it tho? Feel like the cops were to willing to jump on the band wagon.
Did he really do it tho? Feel like the cops were to willing to jump on the band wagon.
are you kidding? he told the cops 18 years ago (on tape) that he did it, and later he wrote a book about how he did it. to me it doesn't really feel like the cops and prosecutors were particularly over-eager to do anything here.
As I understand it it was a proffer, meaning they granted him immunity for anything he said during the interrogation.
Much later he said some of that shit in interviews and books, which he certainly did not enjoy legal immunity, so they could now go after him.
Basically he self snitched.
So because it was in a book they could finally go after him? Is the book what triggered the court proceedings?