this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2026
106 points (65.9% liked)

You Should Know

47939 readers
15 users here now

YSK - for all the things that can make your life easier!

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with YSK.

All posts must begin with YSK. If you're a Mastodon user, then include YSK after @youshouldknow. This is a community to share tips and tricks that will help you improve your life.



Rule 2- Your post body text must include the reason WHY YSK:

In your post's text body, you must include the reason "Why" YSK: It’s helpful for readability, and informs readers about the importance of the content.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-YSK posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-YSK posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

If you are a member, sympathizer or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- The majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Rule 11- Posts must actually be true:

Disinformation, trolling, and being misleading will not be tolerated. Repeated or egregious attempts will earn you a ban. This also applies to filing reports: If you continually file false reports YOU WILL BE BANNED! We can see who reports what, and shenanigans will not be tolerated. We are not here to ban people who said something you don't like.



Rule 12- Linking directly to a video as a source is not acceptable.

Video only posts are responsible for an outsized portion of rules violations. Your post must contain text and meet the requirements of the previous rules.



Rule 13- If you file a report, include what specific rule is being violated and how.



Partnered Communities:

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

Credits

Our icon(masterpiece) was made by @clen15!

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] rizzothesmall@sh.itjust.works 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] bertlewirth@lemy.lol 1 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

Considering the guy who runs that site is a brave empoyee, yes.

[–] dylanTheDeveloper@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Hell nah Brave is awful

Brave had a massive bug where Tor sessions were leaked to ISPs. Ain't no way im trusting something like that in 2026

[–] Goodlucksil@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

How come Brave can interfere with Tor sessions?

[–] Allero@lemmy.today 2 points 1 day ago

Brave has the functionality to access Tor sites. To ba fair,as far as I remember, Brave devs called against using this function for privacy sensitive browsing and added it more as a bonus to access a given resource.

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 150 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (9 children)

This is an ad for Brave. The creator of this site is Arthur Edelstein who is employed by Brave. 🙄

I am so sick of “privacy guides” that subtly try to push a crypto bro ad company browser.

Brave is a crypto bro run ad company whos CEO is openly anti LGBT+.

The OG poster is a 12 day old account with a lot of submissions to try to hide that. I could easily write a bot to do the same to give “credibility”.

[–] solarspark@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I find it hilarious when people call brave, a browser by an ad company basically, a good private browser.

I followed all their shenanigans over the years. No one should touch this bloated browser.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] W3dd1e@lemmy.zip 215 points 3 days ago (8 children)

Say it with me.

Brave 👏 owns 👏 an 👏 ad 👏 network. 👏

Also, the homophobia.

[–] grue@lemmy.world 83 points 3 days ago

It's worse than an ad network; it started out as a crypto scam wrapped in a protection racket. "Sure would be a shame if we MITM'd your ads and didn't share a cut with you because you wouldn't help us legitimize our funny munny."

[–] Zulu@lemmy.world 62 points 3 days ago

If its chromium, i dont want it.

Also, the homophobia.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] btsax@reddthat.com 44 points 3 days ago

Brave is a crypto scam disguised as a reskinned version of Google Chrome

Serious people use literally anything else. At least Google is honest about its spyware

[–] razen@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

Librewolf is the GOAT.

[–] Psythik@lemmy.world 30 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Why does Firefox have an ❌ next to "Insecure website setting"? It very much does warn you. There's even an "HTTPS-only" setting that allows you to completely block insecure websites from loading.

[–] phailhaus@piefed.social 24 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It's an ad for Brave. They are going to lie about their competition.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

So we should be suspect about libre wolf clearly being ball handled by brave in this graph then?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think it's because you have to enable it first?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pega_sus@lemmy.world 55 points 3 days ago (6 children)

Is this a fucking ad? Seriously?

[–] mholiv@lemmy.world 18 points 3 days ago (1 children)

It is. I posted elsewhere but will do so here for visibility.

This is an ad for Brave. The creator of this site is Arthur Edelstein who is employed by Brave. 🙄

I am so sick of “privacy guides” that subtly try to push a crypto bro ad company browser.

Brave is a crypto bro run ad company who’s CEO is openly anti LGBT+.

The OG poster is a 12 day old account with a lot of submissions to try to hide that. I could easily write a bot to do the same to give “credibility”.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] kuberoot@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 day ago

Ah, yes, I should judge the browser by whether it strips arbitrary query parameters from links by default, because there's no way that'll break something, and if it uses encrypted DNS by default when... "connecting from Brazil", because that's definitely a good test of a browser.

[–] sculptor0725@sh.itjust.works 56 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (8 children)

I like how librewolf has more green checks than brave but brave is shown first like it's the best. really shows the biases of the authors

Edit: lmao hoisted by my own petard, it's just in alphabetical order and I just hate brave. Tbf fuck Brendan Eich.

[–] celia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 79 points 3 days ago (3 children)

It's just in alphabetic order

[–] some_designer_dude@lemmy.world 43 points 3 days ago (7 children)

But who controls the alphabet?!

[–] MunkyNutts@lemmy.world 23 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Quality joke (not sarcastic) 👏

[–] towerful@programming.dev 16 points 3 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lime@feddit.nu 18 points 3 days ago

sundar pichai i think

load more comments (5 replies)

Time for my Firefox clone, AAAAArdvark.

[–] Naho_Zako@piefed.zip 27 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Shhh, there has to be a secret agenda to everything!!! Let me have this, lemming! 🥺

[–] NotSteve_@lemmy.ca 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

According to the other comments, the website is by Brave (or at least a Brave employee) so kinda, yeah...

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Pratai@piefed.ca 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So this is Brave’s new ad campaign then?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] WolfLink@sh.itjust.works 18 points 3 days ago

Firefox and Safari both have insecure website warnings, don’t know why they have X’s there

[–] EatMyPixelDust@lemmy.blahaj.zone 22 points 3 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] KulunkelBoom@lemmus.org 11 points 3 days ago

There it is... Firefox and DuckDuckGo... unbeatable combo.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 3 points 2 days ago

What about waterfox?

load more comments
view more: next ›