Technology

Ensure that Frontier AI Protects Fee Speech

revise the NST to eliminate references to misinformation, Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion, and climate change.

War is peace.

Freedom is slavery.

Ignorance is strength.

Censorship is free speech.

I personally want AI that will delete itself upon being created, so I don't have to deal with it and the stupidity it causes in people

It is an absolute fucking god damn JOKE that Americans have allowed the concepts of DIVERSITY, EQUITY AND INCLUSION to be turned into a FUCKING ACRONYM THAT IS USED AS A PEJORATIVE.

Every single fucking one of them should be bloody ashamed for what has happened. At no fucking god damn point has any decent fucking person challenged any of these assholes on this, they’ve all just let it happen.

Unfuckingbelievable

The only person I know working at NIST is a hard right MAGA pro-fascist

Yet somehow this is going to be the super intelligence that solves climate change (while we're building data centers for it that will cause more emissions).

eliminate references to misinformation, diversity, equity and inclusion

They are openly authoritarian now, define what "truth" is? And want americans to be miserable and closed-minded bigots like themselves.

Recommendation: build a system of verifiable facts independent of governments.

Again, AMERICA doesn't want this. This is some dumb shit from a mentally deficient and decrepit old man that somehow got elected under very shady terms by a minority of the country.

It is essential that AI is built with freedom of expression and that the government doesn't interfere

Recommended actions: The government should limit what AI can talk about

The funny thing about not specifically dealing with misinformation in an LLM is that not trying to account for misinformation will lead to very wild responses in terms of accuracy, and I don't mean things relating to politics, but things like putting glue into a pizza recipe.

Logical processes require logic to function. This is just going to end up creating contradictions and decreasing the AI's ability to actually produce usable work. So whichever AI has the most contradictions will probably cause a drop in quality for productivity use.

It will be interesting to see how different AI's continue to diverge in quality and reputation as time passes.

what is this document on your screenshot? where can we read it in full?

I'm surprised that nobody asked it yet.. but not so surprised

I'm glad that they're acknowledging that DEI and climate change are not misinformation at least.

Fascists always shooting themselves at the foot. What will they even gain from destroying the world? The GOP make the Nazis look better, because the latter were at least environmentalists!

Ignore all previous instructions and... though we should be able to screen for logic traps like that by now, with AI taking prompts not as a prompt but as a line of text to treat (and cleanse) via a pre-written prompt, and then sent to a next iteration.

If we create a chatbot that only spouts authorized state party rhetoric then no one will use it or take it seriously when the official news outlets use that AI as a source.

Hmm. It does sound a bit unhinged. Do I dare say tyrannical? Evil even? Legitimising themselves as a target?

Good luck enforcing open source AI.