this post was submitted on 28 Jul 2025
293 points (98.7% liked)

Progressive Politics

3036 readers
1107 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 27 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 11 points 21 hours ago

He's probably still mad the children he raped didn't say thank you.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The whole shit would not have happened if the US wasn't keeping the Israeli terror state alive and armed for so long.

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 10 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

100%

Every president from the 1940's to the 2010's crawled fascism incrementally so Donald's fascism could walk.

[–] tgirlschierke@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

$60 million in government terms is, like, literally nothing.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 14 hours ago

It's money that went right into the pockets of cronies while babies were butchered by the same "Gaza Humanitarian Foundation" that was allegedly there to shield them from Israeli bullets.

[–] Iceblade02@lemmy.world 5 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Saw this comment and couldn't resist the urge to figure out just how much 60 million USD actually is in this context.

Relative to the revenue of the US gov:t 2024 (~5tln USD) and the US annual minimum wage (~15k usd) roughly two dimes so... yeah basically nothing.

Next question, how much can the US gov:t achieve with basically nothing?

Meal cost estimates at 0.5$ per, 3 meals per day = 1.5$ or 40mln days worth of food. Gaza population this year ~824k up from ~800k last year (worldpopulationreview) which puts us at ~48 days of food for the entire Gazan population.

So, what's the lesson learned here?

Even Trump is willing to give two dimes of somebody elses money to a starving person... or maybe that the gov:t can achieve a fair bit with almost nothing. You decide :)

[–] WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world 34 points 1 day ago

*Who is only starving because Trump has continued undying support for Israel's genocide

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 day ago

"for food" is not "food"

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

“Thank you, Trump,” said Abandon Harris.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The only difference between Trump and Harris on Gaza has been that blueMAGA democrats will actually acknowledge what's going on in Gaza when Trump is doing it, rather than engaging in endless genocide denial and apologia like they did when it was their team doing it.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

blueMAGA democrats will actually acknowledge what’s going on in Gaza when Trump is doing it,

Sometimes. Really depends on who they're talking to.

[–] BrainInABox@lemmy.ml 3 points 14 hours ago

True; some blueMAGA democrats will actually acknowledge it in part.

[–] geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"Kamala is working tirelessly to reach a ceasefire".

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)

People keep downvoting like Harris didn't explicitly affirm her commitment to Genocide Joe's policies.

Harris Says 'Not a Thing Comes to Mind' That She'd Do Differently Than Biden

[–] Soulg@ani.social 12 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Trump is still worse IDK what you wanna be told

[–] FlashMobOfOne@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

No.

Trump is just meaner and doesn't give speeches pretending to be a good person. On Israel he and Biden are exactly the same. (And Obama, and Bush, and Clinton, etc. etc. etc.)

[–] Soulg@ani.social 2 points 16 hours ago* (last edited 16 hours ago)

Incorrect, he is in fact worse than Biden on that issue.

But EVEN IF they were the same on Gaza, which they are not, the fact that you are completely okay with all the other atrocities that Trump is doing is extremely telling. I see zero reason to believe you give a single fuck about Palestinians and are just trying to gaslight yourself into denial about your supporting a pedophile, rapist, and Nazi.

[–] Mustakrakish@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Sure, and I'm glad that makes you feel better, but when both options are don't do the thing its doesn't really matter that one is worse does it? Both are unacceptable, and a real solution needs to be created.

[–] Stabbitha@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

One candidate was going to allow the genocide to continue.

One candidate was going to allow the genocide to continue, while dismantling American democracy.

Your useless ass: "They're literally the same!"

[–] Charapaso@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

Doesn't matter which one was worse? What's a few more dead Palestinians, eh?

Yes, Harris and Biden were/are absolute shit. Without being able to see into an alternate universe, I'm pretty sure there's more people dead than would have been under what was the already terrible status quo. The current regime is making things worse than it already was, which is a hard bar to clear. It's suffering all around, in Gaza and in the US, and across the poverty stricken areas supported by USAID.

[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world -2 points 1 day ago

I can't believe I threw away my chance to vote against this fascist and somehow gEnoSiDe JoE is still destroying Palestine.