this post was submitted on 21 Oct 2026
159 points (98.2% liked)

Programmer Humor

33716 readers
1115 users here now

Welcome to Programmer Humor!

This is a place where you can post jokes, memes, humor, etc. related to programming!

For sharing awful code theres also Programming Horror.

Rules

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] potatopotato@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

How did xkcd predict this so perfectly?

https://xkcd.com/221/

[–] Unreliable@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 hour ago

Iirc that's in reference to the PS3?

[–] slazer2au@lemmy.world 16 points 2 hours ago

That was quick.

[–] Triumph@fedia.io 6 points 2 hours ago

That doesn't sound right, but I don't know enough about four to dispute it.

[–] astropenguin5@lemmy.world 6 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

Is there actually a downside to just, typing a random string of numbers manually over a number generator?

[–] MangoPenguin@piefed.social 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Yes, typing randomly isn't actually as random as it could be, so a generator will do a better job.

However mashing the keyboard is absolutely better than literally just "4" lol

[–] RestrictedAccount@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

It is not random enough to not be guessed by a state sponsored bot

[–] biggeoff@sh.itjust.works 7 points 2 hours ago

Aside from humans being terrible random number generators, not as such.

It's better to seed a CSPRNG with a source of entropy though. E.g. there are tools that let you enter the result of many dice rolls and use it to generate a key.

[–] one_old_coder@piefed.social 6 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] alpine_jim@piefed.social 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I'm not random enough? But I was holding up a spork! From my Invader Zim bag!

[–] surewhynotlem@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

This is why Hot Topic girlies are not in charge of crypto standards. They're "OMG so random", but not mathematically so random.