this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2026
568 points (98.8% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

42465 readers
3417 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Reports of this happening in Tennessee. https://www.wsmv.com/2026/10/21/early-voting-concerns-were-brought-head-tennessee-elections-heres-what-he-said/

I bet lots of these electronic voting machines have been upgraded to automatically fix votes accidentally cast for the wrong candidate.

modified clip from Tim and Eric Awesome Show. Great Job.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Axolotl_cpp@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 20 hours ago

"Oh lemmy shitpost phew, wait—"
"Fuckk a news link..."

[–] NathanRanch@lemmy.zip 99 points 1 day ago (1 children)

AI powered voting machines made by Tesla bought by doge

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 6 points 21 hours ago

and the 2024, wasnt suspicious enough? so many blue counties suddenly switched to red all of the sudden, they immediately stopped the count in the states trumps was leading.

[–] daggermoon@piefed.world 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They also write propositions in confusing language so the voter doesnt exactly know if they should vote yes or no. Do you want to vote against not raising taxes on securities, house properties, including investment housing, and after death bequeathments?

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 21 hours ago

they do that in alot of areas beside red too. the past few elections all propositions, you cant tell if they are for or against the prop, if you voting yes/no on it. i think there is a recent one where someone wrote that a prop will give billions to a research center own with 3 employees in california, nothing suspicious about that.

[–] cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Super not confusing for your districts voters who are primarily 70+ year olds who probably can't see very well anymore. Nothing suspicious about it. It a butterfly ballot, who hates butterflies? Everyone loves butterflies? Are you some kind of butterfly hating Cuban?

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 45 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

Not futuristic enough. Besides, they know how to rig those kind of ballots too. I refer you to the "hanging chad" fiasco in Florida circa 2000.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 59 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Anyone who still believes that the U.S. is a democracy should educate themselves.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Anyone who still believes that the U.S. is a democracy ~~should~~ can't educate themselves, **or be educated by others.

[–] DandomRude@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I'm afraid you completely misunderstand what dictatorship means. The U.S. has been an oligarchy for a long time, because the citizens have allowed it and continue to do so to this day. Now, as a logical consequence, the screws are being tightened. If there were still one last chance, resistance would be called for right now. But since that isn't happening, it will come down to what you're already mistakenly assuming.

I’m sorry to have to say this, but the current situation is only the beginning.

[–] CapuccinoCoretto@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Where exactly did I display a misunderstanding of dictatorship? I agree with your general point, but your patronizing tone over red herrings gets a downvote. Bad faith.

[–] Zarobi@aussie.zone 2 points 22 hours ago

I thought it was because you guys have a pathetic system that was easily subverted?

There seemed to be a few moments where he was almost impeached and removed; but every time the answer to "wait, you can do that?" was "yes, and apparently without consequences." Your checks and balances amounted to empty threats and warnings, as he bunt down everything around him.

Try the same shit in any country with a prime minister and they'd be torn apart and on the street by a month. It shouldn't be the average citizen's problem to enforce the laws of your own country on your president. Therefore I don't think the blame rests with them either.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

The U.S. has been always been an oligarchy.

FTFY

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's so infuriating American's seem to be lost in the woods. "It's totally fine, we have checks and balances, the system can't be subverted".

[–] HeyThisIsntTheYMCA@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Fool me a hundred nineteen times shame on me. Fool me a hundred twenty times...

[–] Malica@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Now we get to say we told you so until they pick us off one by one

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 43 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] crazyslinkz@lemmy.zip 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Came here for this...

The Simpson's did it!

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 21 hours ago

its been like this for 2 decades, simpson writers/creators knew it was going on, but it never reaches the news.

[–] FreshParsnip@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

The LEGO movie also references rigged voting machines

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Oh god, I was relieved when it saw it was a shitpost, then I saw the link in the description 😩 fuck these fascists, man...

Edit: read the article and they say it's just a technical error that got caught and fixed. Says they sent a technician from each party to check the machines

[–] trolleyfuckergirl@lemmy.world 4 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Not to be a debbie downer, but I don't trust Republicans checking those machines when it was benefitting them in the first place

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 4 points 21 hours ago

the companies that own the machines all have ties to the gop, if not owned by some of them. thats why you dont see them in deep blue states as much.

[–] cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

read the article and they say it’s just a technical error that got caught and fixed. Says they sent a technician from each party to check the machines

Yeah so was the "hanging chad" issue during the 2000 election. They only fixed that technical error after Bush became president.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

So there is the selection machine that prints a ballot paper, and a scanner that actually counts the vote. If the selection machine does such a shit, you should test the scanner, too.

And the odd thing is that all reports mention switching of the vote from DEM to REP, but none in the other direction...

[–] JcbAzPx@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Literally every time there are "errors" with voting, it's always somehow in the republicans' favor. Strange that....

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 5 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

everyone balked at the idea that mitch mcconnels last senate election wasnt like that either.

[–] PolarKraken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 21 hours ago

Dems doing the "let's uphold decorum, as the good guys", broader libs doing the "thank goodness nothing is seriously wrong, otherwise good guys would be really upset!"

And we plod foot after foot after foot...

[–] stankmut@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It's possible that the layout of the ballot makes it more likely for the votes to switch in a certain direction. Especially since it sounds like they are using resistive touch screens. If the Republican option was on top and the Democratic option was right beneath it and if people are more likely to hit towards the top of the option, a poorly calibrated touch screen could cause votes to swap (initially selecting the Democrat and then the screen gets confused depending on how the pressure changes as you take your finger off and then selects the Republican above it). These kinds of errors were fairly common when resistive touch screens were the norm.

Then the technician comes out, hits firmly in the middle of the field, sees no problems, and calls it a user error.

In Texas, they used a machine with a kind of joystick to select between the options. And those had a tendency of overshooting the center when you let go of it, so the selector would go back up as you were reaching to hit the next screen button. They put incumbents at the top, so it was more common for people to see it swap from Democrat to Republican than the other way around.

It shouldn't be acceptable to run elections with machines that have these problems, but there's no real incentive to fix it.

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I get what you're saying but that doesn't sound at all like what people are describing.

Like maybe you'd fumble a button once but when you have another go and are determined to get it right?

[–] stankmut@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Sometimes people just do the exact same thing over and over. I've seen this a few times. Some app I was working on had a bug where if you touched the icon on the dropdown menu, it wouldn't work. Anywhere else would work. No one noticed until a support ticket came in where this one person complained about being unable to move past that screen. They were just mashing the icon over and over.

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 3 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

That doesn't sound analogous at all.

Someone thought an icon was a button.

That's not the same as someone pressing a democrat button, aparently successfully, and then seeing their vote had flipped to republican.

Especially in a UI which has the sole explicit purpose of enabling a user to accurately select either Republican or Democrat.

[–] stankmut@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago

My point was that not everybody tries different things. We'd never gotten a complaint before because every other person would try to tap a different part of the button (it was a fairly large button that took up 90% of the width of the screen). I just picked a example that was top of mind, but I've seen this in a lot of different contexts involving technology. I've had to help people with resistive touchscreen after watching them jab at the same place over and over.

The UI should have the sole purpose of enabling a user to accurately select a candidate, but they aren't actually made that way. The county in question even provides sticks to help make selections more accurately, so it's apparently been an issue with their machines for years.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They always manage to put the republican in the position these errors favor

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 2 points 21 hours ago

or the fact that we never see the results when it goes into the scanner to be counted, it just says you voted.

[–] cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Oh I'm sure we'll institute such a check after this election cycle and we find out that somehow the scanners were malfunctioning as well. But only after it's too late to change the outcome.

[–] Aneb@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Thank god it will autocorrect my choice to the better suited candidate, the one who bought and cheated the election. I really didn't want to vote for the lesser evil.

[–] Imgonnatrythis@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do any have AI so I don't need to even feel embarrassed about making the wrong selection in the first place??

[–] cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

God, don't encourage them to do that. I know they're already trying to do something sinister as fuck like that.

[–] LeftReddit2@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Reminds me of the voting machine in Postal 4 how it will change who you vote for.

[–] snf@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago
[–] onlyhalfminotaur@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is your boat a C CLASS boat?

[–] cardboardboxfort@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Okay. I'm going to need the name of your boat.

This skit had me dying the first time I saw it.

[–] im_fine_sandy@nord.pub 6 points 1 day ago

A dastardly plot!

load more comments
view more: next ›