They will not even end supply of weapons. Notice how people like Ro Khana say we want to ban weapons that are used to kill Palestinians as if there are weapons that are not used to kill Palestinians
this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2026
37 points (95.1% liked)
Progressive Politics
5070 readers
570 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Agreed. the "defensive weapons" vs "offensive weapons" logical gymnastics piss me off.
Systems that intercept incoming missiles are primarily defensive, though I expect it would be simple enough to use those same interceptors offensively. But as long as there are other offensive weapons and a defensive need it wouldn't make sense to do so.
We shouldn't send defenses sivw weapons to a state acting like nazi Germany
I totally agree. I was just noting the singular example of what I would consider to be a defensive weapon.
What i mean is I even expect offensive weapons to be send under the pretext thst those will be used to attack only Hamas
Sounds plausible.
Even these politicians' own unelectability isn't enough to stop these bastards from sending blood money to Israel. Part of me hopes Israel releases the intel they have on these pieces of shit anyway.
Demand an arms embargo on Israel!