This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
I'm sorry, WHAT??? I use Proton!!! YOU WERE SUPPOSED TO DESTROY THEM, NOT JOIN THEM!
I truly hope we're being overly dramatic here because Proton has been a good service for me. I do not feel like moving everything to another service. At least I have my own domains, though.
I believe they stopped being the good guys a while ago.
Alas, when a company gets big it gets evil.
I'm prepared this time around, I use Protonmail with a custom domain, I'm ready to easily switch.
For the other stuff (Drive, Docs, Sheets, ...) , I'm selfhosting.
I switched to Tuta during the last Proton scandal and never looked back.
I’ve been an early proton adopter and advocate. As well as Bitwarden. This constant need to move platforms is getting really old. Is Tuta worth it? Am I going to have to move in a year because they get private investors? Will they donate to omarchy in six months?
Oh lovely, time to move all of my stuff over to something else
Wow, it's almost like these companies want to destroy themselves.
Really? Is nothing safe these days? I just switched my email to Proton recently from Gmail. It's been a long time coming, and I still can't ditch it completely bcz I have had it for over 10 years and some stuff still uses it.
The bubble can't pop fast enough
So if I'm reading this right, Proton is re-interviewing their entire staff, focusing on how they've integrated AI into their workflow, and if they aren't using AI as much as management wants they're likely to lose their jobs?
That is extremely disappointing.
Posteo is suddenly looking very shiny.
Tuta is good. Waiting on their drive.
Does posteo support custom domains yet?
No and they don't plan on it, as far as I know.
Not a bad idea, only they are going to keep the wrong ones, the cheerleaders instead of the skeptics.
I kinda wonder about this because I get asked about ai at interviews and I tend to give sort of a balance perspective. Saying they have uses but have limitations and thier output has to be reviewed and checked. I keep wondering if that is sinking me for positions among my other buerocratic red flags.
I imagine it varies. I don't ask about AI usage in interviews but if I did I would prefer a balanced answer.
Skepticism tells me you're not going to try to vibe code something important or try to install unapproved models. Not being completely anti-AI in the interview tells me you're not going to insult a manager when they're being stupid.
Soooo happy that I invested the time and effort into self-hosting my own email server.
Until dovecot and/or postifx enshittify, that is.
Can't read, it's paywalled.
To save people from diving into the Reddit swamp. Here is Proton’s response from a similar post over there:
Just to clarify, Proton is not doing layoffs and using AI as an excuse. We actually have a big shortage of talent and are actively hiring across the org: https://proton.me/careers#jobslist
AI is changing the tech industry and we, like everyone else, need to evolve our ways of working to remain effective in our industry, and to deliver features faster to users.
Proton exists to protect privacy and give people control over their digital lives. That commitment guides how we evaluate and use AI, including the tools we use internally. We see opportunities to build better products and work more effectively, but using AI requires judgment about privacy, security, accuracy, and where it adds actual value.
We are assessing how colleagues are adapting to these tools, what support they need, and who can help lead this work. We’re looking for concrete improvements in their work and thoughtful decisions about when to use AI - and when not to.
To do this, we’re in the process of figuring out who among our existing colleagues are the best future leaders, assessing whether everyone has the skills they need to take a step forward in a post-AI world, and making sure we are offering the support that is necessary, to those who need it, to succeed.
In the interest of transparency, the full email that was sent to some of our staff can be found below:
Dear,
AI is fundamentally changing how we build products and how we work. The capabilities Proton needs are evolving, and we must accelerate our transformation to remain competitive and deliver on our mission.
Getting this right is critical to Proton’s future. We need people who can translate AI’s capabilities into better products, stronger execution, and new ways of working—and who approach this change with curiosity, judgment, and urgency.
Last week, Andy interviewed more than 40 senior leaders across Engineering and Product to begin this process. We are now extending re-interviews more broadly to assess how people are adapting to AI and whether they have the capabilities and approach needed for Proton’s next phase.
This is also an opportunity to identify people who can lead the transformation. Those who demonstrate the ability to rethink their work, put AI into practice, and help others adapt may have opportunities to take on greater responsibility, accelerate their development as leaders, and shape Proton’s future.
What does this mean for you?
• Not everyone may be invited to a re-interview.
Given the scale and timeframe, interviews will be prioritized based on the organization’s assessment needs. Whether you receive an invitation should not, on its own, be interpreted as an individual outcome. Any decisions affecting your employment will be communicated separately.
• For those that get invited, re-interviews will take place November 4–11.
Further details about scheduling, format, and preparation will be shared centrally.
• Your interviewer will be outside your team and reporting line.
Interviewers will be selected from a pool of leaders who demonstrate strong AI capability and have aligned on the assessment criteria.
• Expect a discussion about how you think and work.
We want to understand how you apply AI to real problems, how it has changed your approach, where you see opportunities to improve, and how you expect your role to evolve.
• Come prepared with concrete examples.
Be ready to discuss what you have changed in your work, the results, what you have learned, what has not worked, and what you would do differently. A list of tools alone will not demonstrate this.
• Your ability to adapt matters alongside your current capabilities.
We will explore how you learn, challenge established ways of working, exercise judgment, and act on the opportunities AI creates.
What are the consequences?
These re-interviews are consequential. Interviewers will document their assessments, which will inform the broader review of our organization and talent. That review may lead to changes in roles, responsibilities, and continued employment. Individual outcomes will be communicated directly once decisions are finalized.
The process will also help us identify people ready to take on broader scope and leadership responsibilities as Proton evolves.
We recognize that this process creates uncertainty. We will be clear about what has been decided and what remains open, and communicate individual outcomes as soon as we can.
Please take the re-interview seriously and come prepared to discuss your actual work, your experience with AI, and how you can contribute to Proton’s next phase.
Today at 4pm CET, there will be a call for recipients of this email to answer a few more logistical questions.
The meeting will be taking place on this Proton Meet Link
Best,
Did they even read what they wrote? They say they're not doing layoffs, but the internal email states that interview performance could impact "continued employment". Anyone getting that absolutely should be worried about their job.
This definitely sounds better than the headline indicated:
Just to clarify, Proton is not doing layoffs and using AI as an excuse. We actually have a big shortage of talent and are actively hiring across the org: https://proton.me/careers#jobslist [...] we’re in the process of figuring out who among our existing colleagues are the best future leaders, assessing whether everyone has the skills they need to take a step forward in a post-AI world, and making sure we are offering the support that is necessary, to those who need it, to succeed.
However the actual letter to employees seems to undermine it (emphasis added):
That review may lead to changes in roles, responsibilities, and continued employment. Individual outcomes will be communicated directly once decisions are finalized.
Hey managers, don't do this shit. If they had just stopped at "may lead to changes in roles and responsibilities" this would probably be fine, people understand that team structures sometimes need to change or modernize. But don't lie to your employees and tell them it's not about layoffs when that is in fact a possible outcome. If you need to do some layoffs, it should be entirely separate and part of the normal performance eval process, not done via some BS re-interview under a team who probably doesn't even understand the work.
We actually have a big shortage of talent
That review may lead to changes in roles, responsibilities, and continued employment. Individual outcomes will be communicated directly once decisions are finalized.
Knowing how the hiring/onboarding process works in IT — i.e. how fucking hard it is to find, hire, onboard, train and build up a working relationship with an adequate employee — I strongly doubt they have a "shortage of talent" if they're willing to fire (or even just threaten to fire) people over what amounts to tooling use.
Oh, also, if I got an email threatening my "continued employment" over shit like this I'd be looking for a new job ASAP. And I have been using LLMs for my work for a couple of years now.
This is a performance review tied to AI.
The primary use of performance reviews is to manufacture a reason to fire someone.
LOL.
This is sleazy AI drafted corporate speak confirming everyone's supposition: we're pivoting to AI and if you're not on board you're fired.
I guaran-fucking-tee the interview will be fed to a model for analysis and scoring.
I can’t help but presume you’re a high ranking member of proton, perhaps a director level staff member; why else should you have this information readily available? Interesting that you’d be so revealing on a thread where you’re likely to be scrutinized by the audience.
Anyhow, when I read the email I get the impression that you’re sugar coating the process of shoving AI down the throat of your engineers.
Did anyone consider having a normal performance review, where you don’t interrogate engineers on the tools they choose to utilize?
People will be loosing their jobs based on their answers, or won’t even be given the chance to answer based on pre-existing knowledge of their AI usage. Answers that don’t involve AI how you’d like are not good answers. That’s clear. There’s no way to be intellectually honest while pretending otherwise.
Thanks for this.
“We need people who can translate AI’s capabilities into better products, stronger execution, and new ways of working — and who approach this change with curiosity, judgment, and urgency,” the email reads.
What a flaming pile of shit.
Yeah exactly. What I read here is 'if you're vibe coding all your shit and can spout off a bunch of AI workflow buzzwords you can keep your job or get promoted if not you're probably getting canned'
That blows. I was genuinely looking into proton after the news that Google will use their shitty AI to scan Gmail. Fuck that.
Like is nothing private anymore? Soon in Europe all your chats will be monitored, email monitored, ID verification, age verification.
Fuck this new internet.
Heads up! Use a custom domain, don't full for the gmail trap again (it took me 3 years to get all my emails sorted out and I sacrificed some services where it was hard to change the email)
Get you own custom domain, and when Google, Porton, Tuta, ... inevitably goes evil, export and import your emails while keeping your sumu415@myawesomedomain.xyz email address.
In this "personal data economy" hellscape we've created, harvesting people's private data is the default. Unless a product is advertising protecting your privacy like their marketing job depends on it, rest assured, they're doing the opposite. Any company that does not have an explicit policy against data profiling is actively doing it or is gearing up to.
