this post was submitted on 30 Oct 2026
555 points (98.1% liked)

Technology

89311 readers
4008 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Pope Leo XIV says AI systems should be “disarmed,” adding that humans “have the responsibility to guide, change and, when necessary, reject its applications.” In Friday’s Papal Address, Pope Leo encourages United Nations member states to “take concrete steps toward banning lethal autonomous weapons” during their meeting in Geneva next month.

The address reflects many of the ideas Pope Leo laid out in his first major papal document in May, which highlighted “safeguarding the human person in the time of artificial intelligence.” In line with his encyclical, Pope Leo tells participants that “Machines are tools, not persons,” and warns about the dangers of granting AI systems rights or legal personhood. “Decisions affecting human life, freedom, and the use of force must always remain subject to effective, informed, and responsible human oversight,” Pope Leo says.

In 2024, Pope Francis similarly called for a ban on autonomous weapons, saying, “No machine should ever choose to take the life of a human being.” AI has become a popular topic for Pope Leo, who suggests he chose his name because he must confront advances in the technology — similar to how Pope Leo XIII presided over the church at the forefront of the Industrial Revolution.

Pope Leo closes out his address by calling for international institutions to safeguard the common good from AI-related risks, along with “shared standards, independent oversight and clear mechanisms of accountability so that decisions concerning the development and use of AI can be examined, challenged when necessary, and accompanied by appropriate remedies for any harm caused.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 1 points 19 minutes ago
[–] EloySg@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 hours ago

Im not Happy about using AI for war,but that is because war exists, I'd like AI to be FOSS and accesible locally for everyone.

[–] jaykrown@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

But corporations are people? They have more rights than women these days.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 23 minutes ago

But corporations are people

That's another concept that needs to cease to exist.

[–] EloySg@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

They're juridical entities,akin but not exactly people.

They still have rights and obligations but they're not people in the strict sense, you cant incarcerate a corporation.

[–] godsammitdam@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Unfortunately, even when they, as a group, decide to cause harm and suffering. Cheaper to pay legal fees for death and dismemberment than pay for recalls.

https://www.spokesman.com/stories/2008/oct/17/pinto-memo-its-cheaper-let-them-burn/

Cheaper to pay for less/worse healthcare which leads to more death and bankruptcy...

Cheaper to eliminate roles and replace them with contract positions which don't have benefits leading to the same as above...

Almost like they can't be held accountable.

And then if it's attempted, they can just defer the judgements which harms the victims more...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xNo8Ve-Ej6U

Must be nice to be a person when it suits you and not a person when it suits you.

[–] ZILtoid1991@lemmy.world 3 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 0 points 1 hour ago

Everyone wants the Butlerian Jihad until the Butlerian Jihad is actually here.

[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago
[–] dusk@piefed.social 0 points 2 hours ago

Applicable to all religions, and all religious people

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hm3mDatFpNE

[–] Gpennyhigh@lemmy.world 3 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

Call the llm it or this, something non-human, "this machine is wrong, check again or give more sources." Ask them to use Sagan's baloney detection kit and high levels of perry's scheme of thinking to examine things, detect unfalsifiable things like the Invisible Dragon story.

[–] funkreddit@lemmy.zip -2 points 7 hours ago

Can he not pray this bs away?

[–] Zwuzelmaus@feddit.org 89 points 1 day ago (4 children)

humans “have the responsibility

Machines are tools, not persons

No machine should ever choose to take the life of a human being

I say these are wise words.

[–] WhoIzDisIz@lemmy.today 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

They will counter with "if we don't use them, we'll be leaving ourselves open to enemies who will." Setting aside the inevitable "you are the enemy" argument/retort, there is some valid logic to this. IMHO, the end result should be laws - with significant teeth and provisions that make them as impervious to politics as possible - that hold the designers and users of such weapons accountable for the "choices" such weapons make. Yeah, we need to prepare for the worst, but acknowledge that "worst" can be from both external and internal forces.

[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago

I mean sure, but rogue AI weapons are just as likely to kill us all as they are to help us. Not everything humans do needs to be about war. Besides, we can already send a cruise missile halfway around the world. How much more lethal do we need to get? Spy satellites all over the place (and even space weapons now, which i thought we all agreed not to do). Shits getting scary. Eventually we'll wipe ourselves put with these silly games we play, if climate change doesn't do it first for us, which is a whole other can of worms.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Nutteman@lemmy.world 36 points 1 day ago

Pope said Butlarian Jihad

[–] EvilBit@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I disagree. The persons making AI are definitely tools.

Unless I misunderstood the statement.

[–] Doomsider@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Wrong, in the US the tool is never ever the problem.

Unless, I misunderstood the statement.

[–] dusk@piefed.social 2 points 2 hours ago

They are called 'voters' in the usa

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Whoa, guys, we found an 11th commandment in another holy book.

You shalt not make a machine in the image of the human mind.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Thou shalt not make a machine in the likeness of a man's mind. A woman's mind is far superior

Dude-aronomy 69:42

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Tangentially, that quote is from Frank Herbert's Dune saga. In God-Emperor of Dune Leto II's "Fish Speaker" soldiers are exclusively female for various reasons explained in the book. From memory: more disciplined, less rapey.

[–] Nouvellalia@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

Yup. I was going to chastise you for calling to a literary work for the weight it holds, and then white washing it so it would be more palatable. Then I decided that flipping it would be more fun.

[–] peopleproblems@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ah, but what the O.C. Bible should've said was 'Thou shalt not make a machine to counterfeit the human mind.'

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 1 points 4 hours ago

From memory, that's more or less what Leto II says in GEoD.

[–] My_IFAKs___gone@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I agree with this PapaI decree

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sharkticon@lemmy.zip 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Thou shalt not allow a thinking machine to exist.

[–] Funkt4st1c@lemmy.world 3 points 20 hours ago

Well, it would have to think first, which LLMs objectively dont do.

[–] nanometer1625@thelemmy.club 1 points 20 hours ago

Machines are not persons yet.

load more comments
view more: next ›