this post was submitted on 03 Nov 2026
482 points (95.6% liked)

Technology

89588 readers
3530 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] eicker@lemmy.world 207 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Funny how AI has supposedly surpassed the greatest scientists, yet the greatest scientific discovery here is always announced by the guy selling subscriptions. If it really is that smart, perhaps it could explain to Sam the difference between a peer reviewed breakthrough and a product launch.

[–] LewdLemon@sh.itjust.works 77 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

If it really is that smart, perhaps it could explain to Sam the difference between a peer reviewed breakthrough and a product launch.

911, I'd like to report a murder.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Flower@sh.itjust.works 15 points 6 days ago (2 children)

To be fair to AI, the problem with Sam and OpenAI was always PEBKAC.

[–] baldingpudenda@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm sorry, Sam. I can only explain it to you. I can't understand it for you, as well.

[–] generallynonsensical@piefed.ca 19 points 5 days ago (6 children)

You can lead a man to knowledge, but you can't make him think.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Avicenna@programming.dev 8 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

These math breakthroughs happened by throwing tens of thousands of agents at a problem to cover all possible angles (with tools developed by other mathematicians) costing the same amount of money as hiring ten top tier mathematicians for several years. Not saying it is not impressive, but not "AI can replace sciencetists" level impressive.

[–] SW42@lemmy.world 50 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Please Sam, put the AI in charge of your company. Pretty please

[–] kadotux@sopuli.xyz 11 points 5 days ago

If he really believed what he said, he would. But he knows he's just talking shit

[–] rustydrd@sh.itjust.works 60 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

If it's so smart, maybe they should ask it to come up with a viable business strategy, because he sure as hell hasn't figured it out, lol.

[–] isles@infosec.pub 19 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"We have no current plans to make revenue. We have no idea how we may one day generate revenue. We have made a soft promise to investors that once we've built this sort of generally intelligent system, basically we will ask it to figure out a way to generate an investment return for you." - Sam Altman

[–] MrScottyTay@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

What a fucking stupid grift that is, how are they falling for it?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 21 points 5 days ago

The more pants-on-head crazy the claims are, the more desperate they are.

[–] The_greatest_ahole9@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Just because AI is smarter than Sam Altman doesn't mean it’s smarter than top scientists. Especially considering Sam is just about as smart as a pile of horseshit.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 16 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

I believe AI is smarter than Sam Altman.

Sam Altman believes he is smarter than scientists.

[–] humorlessrepost@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

I asked AI if it’s smarter than scientists, and it said no. So if Sam says I should trust AI, Sam is full of shit.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 4 days ago

Sam, just because the digital parrot outsmarts you, it does not need to be intelligent.

[–] Tattorack@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (5 children)

AI is a deep learning algorithm used for information retrieval with dubious accuracy.

It doesn't think. It has no awareness or understanding. It's not intelligent. It certainly can't come up with something new or creative like an intelligent person can.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] redwattlebird@thelemmy.club 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Yawn. Wake me up when AI cures all cancers.

[–] FlembleFabber@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would be curious to know what would happen in that case, life expectancy would skyrocket

[–] redwattlebird@thelemmy.club 1 points 1 day ago

Not really. There'd always be something else such as Alzheimer's etc.

[–] mcv@lemmy.zip 21 points 5 days ago

AI is not smarter than the best scientist. It's just smarter than Sam Altman. But that's partially because Sam Altman is regressing due to his over reliance on AI.

[–] bashibazouk@lemmy.world 37 points 6 days ago

Ya, Sam, call me when the AI knows what questions to ask that it came up with on its own rather than just scraping...

[–] tea_n_typewriters@lemmy.world 35 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I’ll believe it when I hear it from the brightest human scientists, not the glorified salesman who would ironically be perfectly replaced by AI.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] f314@lemmy.world 31 points 5 days ago (5 children)

Is it because he thinks he is the brightest human scientist, but it turns out he’s actually pretty stupid?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Alexstarfire@lemmy.world 18 points 5 days ago

It's the best monkey at the typewriter.

[–] SomeRandomNoob@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I belive it as soon as they replace Scam Altman with AI as CEO and report postive growth and income for at last the next 10 Years.

[–] phlegmy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 4 days ago

But CEO's are much more smarterer than scientists!
If scientists are so smart, why don't they have any money?
Don't tell me they value something other than "number go up" because I won't understand you.

Since they just lost a lot of millions last week, they need a new grift

[–] very_well_lost@lemmy.world 23 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Sam Altman has been credibly accused of raping his sister.

...not going anywhere with this, just felt compelled to share.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DarkSurferZA@lemmy.world 22 points 6 days ago (1 children)

So they just gonna fire all their AI engineers and replace them with AI now, right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CluelessCalls@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Is that sister fucking Sam Altman?

[–] jystfact@sh.itjust.works 13 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (1 children)

It's like saying books in general hold more knowledge than humans

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] IamLost@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

These types of people don't know the difference between having an answer and understanding. It's why when AI solves a long running math problem, it's practically useless to us.

[–] jontree255@lemmy.world 18 points 6 days ago

Ah, pulling an Elon, where you just say impressive sounding bullshit so people keep giving you money.

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 7 points 5 days ago

Now we flipped the house and senate, I hope we get some common sense guard rails for AI.

[–] agent_nycto@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

If AI is so smart how come it can't figure out how to run without a shit tonne of water and generating all that noise?

[–] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 days ago (3 children)

yo Sam...give one single example where any scientist can solve anything without new data generated by experimentation done in a lab by people.

The idea that a "super intelligence" will cure diseases is a an ignorant view of drug discovery. AI is being trained on mostly experimental failures and mostly poor experimental design in poor model systems for human disease. You can only polish a turd so hard.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NocturnalMorning@lemmy.world 6 points 5 days ago

AI spits out whatever it finds on the internet. I guess you could say that's smart if you're being obtuse about it...

[–] tio_bira@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 6 days ago

Can we just please ignore Sam Altman and his petty little company, you guys are making free ads for him and whatever company his lead

[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 6 points 5 days ago

Yet I can ask it to do work that only a moderately smart human can do, like read, and it fucks that up so hard.

Is this how we find out Sam Altman is actually an illiterate dipshit?

[–] iampivot@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

If the AI is so smart, why do they have to train it?

Altman Crows That AI Is Now Smarter Than the Brightest Human Scientistsfuturism.com OpenAI CEO Sam Altman claimed that AI models are now smarter than top scientists, amid controversy over its purported math breakthroughs.

[–] 0x0@infosec.pub 8 points 5 days ago

If the ai is so smart, why is he up on stage marketing it instead of his ai

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Eat_Your_Paisley@lemmy.world 10 points 5 days ago

Can we just make Sam broke so the media stops faithfully recording his brain ejaculations

[–] FireWire400@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago
[–] bobjones1665@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Where is Luigi when you need him?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] shirro@aussie.zone 3 points 4 days ago

But apparently not smarter than CEOs or these con artists would all fuck off.

[–] canttakeitwithyou@lemmy.zip 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

If Sam believes that, will he replace himself with AI and retire already? Pretty please? ... It's so easy to catch the ultra-rich in their lies; they simply can't be bothered to speak believably.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›