I used to use 1.2.3.4 as my gateway.
At the time I didn't understand why this offended ... Basically everybody.
Hint: :q!
Sister communities:
Community rules (click to expand)
1. Follow the site-wide rules
sudo in Windows.Please report posts and comments that break these rules!
Important: never execute code or follow advice that you don't understand or can't verify, especially here. The word of the day is credibility. This is a meme community -- even the most helpful comments might just be shitposts that can damage your system. Be aware, be smart, don't remove France.
I used to use 1.2.3.4 as my gateway.
At the time I didn't understand why this offended ... Basically everybody.
As a Network Engineer: If you did this in my presence, I'd burn you at the goddamn stake. π
Like I said ... Basically everybody.
That's mostly because it violates established standards, but you know that already. Lol.
Also, if you're talking to a network engineer, they probably have PTSD dealing with a client that did this with a 1.0.0.0/8 used internally or some shit and now huge swathes of the internet doesn't work, but somehow it's "our fault" that they can't load random web sites.
Thatβs mostly because it violates established standards, but you know that already. Lol.
Hey, for all you know he might actually be the proper owner of that subnet.....
I know if by some crazy coincedence I had that in my subnet I'd be using it for fun.
I recently had a ticket for a university that had a /12 of public IPs. They gave every computer, printer, etc. a public IP on their whole network. Nothing has NAT. It was insane. They could buy an entire other university building with the money they'd make selling some of that address space down to even a /24.
Fwiw, I now use 10.10.220.0/24. I now know what class A, B and C are. I didn't then.
Hopefully that offers you some comfort.
Everyone knows you need to be using a network like fd25:c74c:a5e9::/64. So much more fun that way.

I'm sure this is hilarious, but I don't know enough about IPv6 to get it.
It's just a 'proper' IPv6 private address, the IPv6 equivalent of '10.'.
I say proper as a private address in ipv6 is supposed to be fd, then 40 random bits, then whatever you want. Nothing stops you from having fd::/64 as your private network though. The thinking was people who got tired of merging networks that happened to choose the same 10.x.x.x scheme and/or vpn connecting to multiple sites similarly with the same private address. So they thought it would be swell if every private network on earth would likely be unique, so they said you 'must' randomize 5 bytes of it. Then no renumbering/no conflicting vpn connections.
Haha all good homie.
I'm the cat
1 is my pc. 254 is the managed micro switch i use to isolate work stuff. Most things are neatly arranged - eg: 70 is the testbed proxmox, 79 is its idrac, 71-78 are the vms, same with 80 on my production proxmox. DHCP is zoned from 101 to 199, IoT are assigned fixed IPs in similar ranges, etc.
Modem is 11
Danny John-Jules?!
wrowling noises
Who hurt you?
No one. And even funnier? I do this shit professionally
Lol you fucking psycho. Love it.
Nah, put your gateway in a different subnet, but on the same network segment, and add a static /32 route to it on every client.
Subnet: 10/8
Gateway: 10.2.5.5
Thanks. I hate it.