this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2026
105 points (99.1% liked)

Fediverse

44839 readers
974 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, Mbin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration)

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

From the technical side anyone can spin up their own Lemmy instance and view all votes, but I'm curious at what the community's perspective on how "private" that is. I think Mbin already shows upvoters? Piefed allows anonymous voting. I also know there are sites which show all voting history, but assuming those are fairly disliked.

My general questions to the community: - Do you expect your votes to be private, or just not shown in the UI? - Would per-voter votes showing up on another aggregator platform bother you, even though your instance already shares them with other servers?

For context I'm the dev doing some two way bridge interop between atproto + Threadiverse, in atproto the votes/likes are generally publicly accessible, you just look at the users repo through something like pdsls.dev, they're readable and archivable by anyone. In my opinion this isn't that big of a problem since it's fairly hard to look at and discern (Ex all my votes: https://pdsls.dev/at://did:plc:lmdkqemqrqnfiix72pyjhfey/social.coves.feed.vote). Ultimately trying to figure out if there's already a mutual understanding that they are public and we can just mirror them or whether they should stay hidden as an aggregate.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 1 points 15 hours ago

do it mang.

I downvote Nazi shit and upvote funny shit. I got nothing to hide.

[–] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 day ago (2 children)

About 10 years ago I decided that the only way I could proceed forward in life is to automatically assume I'm being watched and listened to always. This has nothing to do with paranoia and everything to do with the nature of tech ownership and capitalism.

This is a very good assumption to make. Because it's true.

[–] sf2710@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

I'm the same. And even if you don't take the digital world into account, today we have devices everyone can buy for around 3 to 10 thousand dollars with wich can hear what you're doing from 3 kilometers away (combined with a good analysis kit you can even know what someone a few hundred meters away is typing on their keyboard).

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 2 points 18 hours ago

Not very.

Which is fine with me

[–] Bo7a@piefed.ca 9 points 1 day ago

zero private.

[–] Forester@pawb.social 2 points 20 hours ago

Fully public

[–] mattreb@programming.dev 1 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

imho:

  1. public, just not shown in ui
  2. would bother me if shown near the comment/post, since that would change the meaning of the vote: on lemmy only the total is shown there, sometime I do things like upvoting a comment I don't fully agree with because that "aggregate" is too low in my opinion (or the opposite of that), which make sense only if just the total is shown.
[–] ramble81@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Better question? Do votes ultimately matter? Some instances show who voted, some don’t, some don’t even count downvotes. So in the end, who cares?

[–] BaraCoded@literature.cafe 3 points 1 day ago

There are private things on the internet?

[–] Blaze@piefed.zip 35 points 2 days ago

Completely public

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

Not at all.

[–] gatitaQwQ@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I didn’t know that administrators or moderators could see the votes. So they can’t be considered completely private.

[–] magnetosphere@fedia.io 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I assume there’s no privacy whatsoever, and I wouldn’t believe anyone who told me otherwise.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

There's zero faith involved in open source. It's verifiable with your own eyes, thankfully.

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 1 day ago

I realize they aren't private and don't care.

I vote on such a small minority of things that those few things I do vote on, I have no problem with people knowing it was me.

[–] JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

Votes are not private and never will be.

There have been some discussions about whether Threadiverse software should only federate out the number of votes and perhaps some anonymised voter IDs, rather than information that identifies individual users. This would prevent vote snooping via sites like Lemvotes. However, even if something like that were implemented, instance admins would still be able to snoop on their own users if they so wished. So imo, it's better to just accept that votes are public information.

Personally I don't see the issue with it. My principle when it comes to voting is upvoting stuff I want others to see and only downvote things I don't think anyone would want to see (like spam). So if for some odd reason someone is interested enough to check my voting history, I don't care. What's the worst that could happen? Someone on the internet disagrees with my votes? Oh no! How will I ever survive?!

As a side note, Lemmy's developers seem to have a strong opinion that voter information shouldn't be displayed publicly. For example, here's an issue they opened in the Mbin repo. While I disagree with their stance on vote visibility, Nutomic has a valid point there: Lemmy doesn't mark voting activity as public when federating it out, so there's an argument to be made that other software should not display individual votes coming from Lemmy.

[–] dreadbeef@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Never will be? The next version of Lemmy has private votes. Why do you believe otherwise?

[–] JRaccoon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 21 hours ago

Hmm, by next version you mean the upcoming 1.0.0 release? They have implemented private communities but I haven't seen vote privacy mentioned anywhere. Can you link some source for this?

[–] XiELEd@piefed.social 16 points 2 days ago (3 children)

What’s the worst that could happen?

Some data brokers looking through your preferences and building a profile out of you, I guess.

[–] Azzu@leminal.space 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but what they're gonna do with that is the question. Like even if there is a profile on my Lemmy account, which ads are they going to send me? How? Where is that data going to be worth anything?

[–] XiELEd@piefed.social 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean I live in a country whose political environment was irrevocably changed because of Cambridge Analytica. And facebook's algorithm is partly being blamed for the Rohingya genocide in Myanmar. It's not really about you that I'm worried with, but for others in general.

[–] Azzu@leminal.space 1 points 1 day ago

But still, all that was done through political ads and algorithm changes, and I literally haven't seen any ad in years, and so far Lemmy's algorithm is very transparent.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] clb92@lemmy.ml 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lemmy's developers seem to have a strong opinion that voter information shouldn't be displayed publicly.

I guess they shouldn't have made votes public then... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] originalucifer@moist.catsweat.com 93 points 2 days ago (2 children)

not. at all. i consider anything i put here akin to standing on my nearest street corner during rush hour, shouting into the darkness

confused how anyone could think anything otherwise.

[–] Carl@anarchist.nexus 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yup. Anyone expecting privacy on a federated service has been inherently misinformed about how federation works. Everything I do here is assumed to be public.

And I also assume that state agencies are running their own instances, to suck up as much data as they can. They can just federate with the big instances, and then the data gets firehosed directly to them via the built-in federation. It’s why AI scrapers on the fediverse are so frustrating. The scraper could just spin up an instance and passively collect all of the same data via federation. But instead, they just DDOS the instance owners.

Also, the users who bitch and moan about downvotes (because they can see who downvoted them) are pure comedic gold. I have seen users try to call out the specific people who downvoted them. Like they’ll edit their comment with something like “hey @{user1}, @{user2}, @{user3}, care to explain why you downvoted?” The only thing that ever accomplishes is getting them buried in even more spite-downvotes.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

confused how anyone could think anything otherwise

Because you can't see them by default. Just because there are lots of techies on here doesn't mean everyone thinks about how it all works.

I think it's much better to make it very obvious that votes are public so new users don't accidentally think they're anonymous.

[–] whoisearth@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I guarantee you multiple individuals be they personal or corporate have spun up their own Lemmy instances and are scraping the shit out of what is here.

[–] smeg@feddit.uk 7 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Exactly, so it's important for everyone to know that their every action is very public

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] nomy@lemmy.zip 67 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They're not private at all, I've never been under the illusion that they were.

I like it, have some guts, stand on business. If people want to downvote they should be willing to attach their name to it, internet points are fake anyway.

[–] Martineski@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

My issue with votes is being able to profile users on a pretty deep level. It may not matter all that much now but once bad actors like corporations, scammers, stalkers, etc. start getting involved then there's a lot negatives that it would bring with it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GottaHaveFaith@fedia.io 21 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I don't expect much privacy on a shared public space like the fediverse. If I wanted privacy, I'd spin up a new profile every day/week, and use an external bookmark manager to save stuff

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Agrivar@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

I wish my votes were even more public. If I've taken the time to downvote your bullshit/nonsense, I want you to know it was me. Same with upvotes.

[–] Aeri@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Literally none I basically assumed that anything I do on the internet can be read by anyone at any time. I'm still a fucking freak because they'll have to kill me to stop me from being freaky. If I die unexpectedly the government did it. Never forget that.

[–] basilisa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 day ago

Freaky died just the other night. Some say it was suicide.

[–] realitista@lemmus.org 7 points 2 days ago

He died how he lived: being freaky.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wren@piefed.social 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lemvotes shows votes. So, it’s not private.

[–] dual_sport_dork@lemmy.world 20 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Moderators can also see votes on posts in their communities. I assume instance admins can do the same for everything.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SuiXi3D@fedia.io 23 points 2 days ago

Not at all, and I believe that’s the point.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

I don't worry about that. I have no expectation that up/downvotes be not tied to my username.

[–] farmgineer@nord.pub 20 points 2 days ago

Data has to federate, so nothing is going to really be private like you mention. I think it's unreasonable to expect anything otherwise. I don't see a point to hiding votes because of this. If someone starts stalking or harassing their voters for some reason, have a reporting system and handle that.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 10 points 2 days ago

I have no expectations of privacy on any social media, including this one. I'm here to yell my very important opinions at anyone who'll listen.

[–] chicken@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 2 days ago

I don't expect my votes to be private, but I will vote as if they were. People reading too much into why someone might have voted a certain way and trying to shame them for it is embarrassing, I'm not going to constrain myself to reasons for voting that are immediately legible to anyone via only one bit of information just for their sake. If I want to downvote something with, for instance, a political message I agree with but the person phrased it in a way that goes against my pet peeves, I'm gonna do that, and I think the ideal would be for these numbers not to be taken very personally or seriously.

So basically I'd say it's bad taste to put it in a UI, but only so far as it encourages people to be weird about it, and ultimately that's on them.

[–] Hanrahan@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago

zero, it's on the internet, it:s not "private"

[–] tal@lemmy.today 9 points 2 days ago

From the technical side anyone can spin up their own Lemmy instance and view all votes,

Or just view them on lemvotes.org.

[–] perishthethought@piefed.social 13 points 2 days ago (5 children)

On Lemmy? As others have said, they're automatically federated and so anyone can see them.

On Piefed though? I have a user setting where I can choose whether my votes federate and I can override that default on a given post if I choose with a hot key. That's how it should be. IMHO, more of y'all should use Piefed.

load more comments (5 replies)

Nothing I do on the Fediverse is private lmao.

[–] Amuro_eat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 2 days ago

Well they aren’t private and it doesn’t matter

[–] ZoDoneRightNow@kbin.earth 10 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Zero. Upvotes are a show of appreciation and I don't see why anyone would want that to be private. When it comes to downvotes, if you wouldn't want someone to know you downvoted something, you can't stand by that decision and so shouldn't have downvoted in the first place. Public reactions (alongside the self moderation features) keeps the fediverse honest and prevents the hostile type of downvote spamming you see on other platforms like reddit.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›