this post was submitted on 06 Aug 2025
689 points (84.1% liked)

Technology

73878 readers
3577 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] breecher@sh.itjust.works 62 points 3 days ago (5 children)

"Newspaper which uses AI to write its articles concocts derogatory term for people who doesn't use AI"

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 13 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Imo vegan shouldn't be seen as derogatory. I'm not one, but got a lot of respect for most of em.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] zeca@lemmy.ml 33 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Im also a gun vegan, a car vegan, a facebook vegan, an exercise vegan (unfortunately), a windows vegan, ... just not actual vegan.

I feel like thats a bad way to use the word vegan.

[–] TheMonk@lemmings.world 2 points 2 days ago

It’s an incredibly stupid phrase. Like, mind-numbingly stupid. “I’m not gluten free, I’m a bread vegan.” Idiotic

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 59 points 4 days ago (3 children)

This makes about as much sense as calling Linux users "Windows vegans".

Choosing to not use AI isn't some wacky contrarian position, it's a tame position that can easily be justified. (Don't want to use AI? Then don't.) If anything, trying to assert that constantly using AI for everything would be the new normal is the wacky position.

[–] rfr_Foglia@feddit.it 19 points 3 days ago (13 children)

Not eating animals is not a wacky contrarian position either, and I'm not even vegan

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TimewornTraveler@lemmy.dbzer0.com 73 points 4 days ago (3 children)

how to belittle and minimize a very serious thing: call any protesters of it a " ___ vegan"

[–] Sergio@lemmy.world 28 points 4 days ago

They are "journalism vegans". They are choosing to abstain from actual journalism for clickbaiting, herd mentality, and personal lack of skill reasons.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] normalexit@lemmy.world 108 points 4 days ago (9 children)

Abstaining from a thing does not make one a vegan. That's not how any of this works.

[–] Fleur_@aussie.zone 39 points 4 days ago (12 children)

I'm sex vegan. Cry about it virgins

load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
[–] guillem@aussie.zone 360 points 5 days ago (19 children)
  • Teetotalers: alcohol vegans.
  • Straight edgers: drug vegans.
  • Recycling: waste vegans.
  • Solar power: power vegans.

The possibilities are infinite if you are a netaphor vegan.

[–] Auth@lemmy.world 262 points 5 days ago (3 children)

Carnivores: vegetable vegans.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting@lemmy.world 132 points 5 days ago (9 children)
  • Working class: retirement vegan
  • American: healthcare vegan
  • German: humour vegan

My god, it's unstoppable

load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] abbiistabbii@lemmy.blahaj.zone 103 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Calling them after a maligned (if harmless) group seems like a choice to paint refusing to use AI as being annoying, preachy and scorn-worthy.

They seem very determined to pressure people into using AI regardless of it's practicality, environmental impact, or anything. Fuck this shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] udon@lemmy.world 23 points 4 days ago (1 children)

"refuse" lol as if there were a general requirement to use this shit

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hossenfeffer@feddit.uk 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

We don't need to invent new terms, like 'AI Vegan', when we have a perfectly good term already: Butlerian Jihadist.

[–] raspberriesareyummy@lemmy.world 19 points 3 days ago (2 children)

The better term would be "LLM gobbling fuckheads" for those who use that stuff and believe it has anything to do with "AI"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Allemaniac@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago (2 children)

"AI vegans"? I knew guardian was already bought by tech bros, but wtf is that phrasing lmao I dont use AI either, simply because it is wrong more often than not and I am still capable of googling myself, but being cautious equals to being vegan in tech bro eyes?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 118 points 5 days ago

This is such a stupid name for this.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 53 points 4 days ago (1 children)

i wonder if they came up with such term to mock those who dont want to use ai and possibly actual vegans on the side.

[–] Jason2357@lemmy.ca 36 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

They use to mock us with “Luddite” but the Technologists looked into that actual movement (rather than the caricature) and agreed, “yeah sure, like them”. That took the sting out of the pejorative, so they picked another mocked group to connect it with.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 29 points 4 days ago (2 children)

We let environmentalism become an individual issue, and that was a mistake. Can we not do this for AI? It's a society-wide problem, not something you can solve by measuring your own personal AI footprint.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Brett@feddit.org 177 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"AI vegans"

ffs, just publish an article with a single clownemoji for the same effect.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 82 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (23 children)

The big corporations desperately want AI to be popular because they've thrown literally insane amounts of money at it and still don't know how to monetize it.

There's going to be a huge push to make it seem like everyone loves it and it's weird not to use it constantly

It's going to go horribly and come off like that "fellow kids" meme, exactly like this headline

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 41 points 4 days ago (13 children)

I refuse to use it because it's shit.

We are not the same.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] aeternum@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 4 days ago (21 children)

I don’t use ai either. But because it’s fuckin stupid. It’s not even ai. It’s a glorified sorting algorithm.

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 151 points 5 days ago (6 children)

It’s quite common for me to be annoyed, angry, or upset at a headline writer. Then there’s the feeling I got reading “Meet the AI vegans.”

Whole new level.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] sirico@feddit.uk 13 points 3 days ago

Journalists constantly trying to be the origin of a term.

[–] Alfredolin@sopuli.xyz 14 points 4 days ago

No an Image generation is not ten times the impact pf a Google search, a ChatGPT query is. Image generation is probably a lot more.

[–] bigbabybilly@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Missed opportunity to coin the term “Aitheist” Fools.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kadaverin0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 4 days ago (1 children)

This is the dumbest shit I've ever read. Refusing to submit to corpo ratfuckery isn't a lifestyle choice. It's common sense.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TheGuyTM3@lemmy.ml 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I hate the term AI vegan. I prefer mistechnitinoimosyne. More classy.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 40 points 4 days ago (15 children)

I don't use A.I. because I've had nothing but negative interactions with A.I. Customer service bots that fail to give adequate responses, unhelpful and incorrect search result summaries, and, "art," that looks like shit hasn't made me want to sign up for ChatGPT or Gemini. For most people, this isn't a moral stance, it's just that the product isn't worth paying for. Stop framing people that don't use A.I. as luddites with an ax to grind just because tech bros spent billions on a product that isn't good yet.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] jerkface@lemmy.ca 72 points 5 days ago (2 children)

It's not cool to use "vegan" like this.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Kolanaki@pawb.social 86 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

"Have you ever been called an AI vegan?"

"No... Shit no! I believe saying something like that'd get your ass kicked!"

[–] foodconsumer@lemmy.world 7 points 3 days ago (9 children)

There has to be a catchier name than AI vegans...

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] thedruid@lemmy.world 41 points 5 days ago (2 children)

What bullshif us this?

A. I vegan is a nonesence title.

How about " people who don't want the world to end even faster tell corps to fuck off"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Toribor@corndog.social 64 points 5 days ago

People just going about their business living their lives as they have for many years...

Silicon Valley: Hey fuck you. Also I came up with a dumb nickname for you.

load more comments
view more: next ›