Toribor

I guess let me know when the revolution starts or when you figure out how to overthrow the two party system since they are clearly identical and equally bad.

Now I'm a big brain enlightened centrist who can feel good and smart about doing absolutely nothing to help anyone.

Thank you for the information, you can lecture me all about how much worse Democrats are when we share a cell in El Salvador.

I suppose I don't see that as a productive perspective? You're not offering any solutions or actions to take to enact the change you want to see besides doing nothing until we collectively figure out how to have a revolution.

The system is flawed. Maybe you're right that it is fundamentally broken and cannot be reformed but disengaging from voting only supports the status quo and those that are already in power. I think it's worth it to vote for candidates that share some of the same values as me even if they aren't perfect while continuing to put political pressure on leaders that are not serving the public effectively. I would vote for someone one day and join a protest against them the next day, I do not see that as a contradiction. That is just being civically engaged.

Also I know I'm probably coming in hot here but I'm truly not mad or upset. I think these are the sorts of conversations on Lemmy that are really great and hard to have in other settings. I appreciate your thoughtful responses. It seems like we're pretty aligned on what the problems are. I'm very open to solutions that don't involve harming others but if you aren't a voter I'd strongly encourage you to consider voting, though I agree that voting alone will not solve every problem.

I suppose I'm open to suggestions?

I understand what you're getting at but I don't know what kind of answer you want here. Are you suggesting that violence is the only way to achieve change? Are you suggesting that third party candidates could win a national election and then eliminate the two-party system? Are you suggesting that electing more Republicans will result in a political future that offers more power to voters to choose their own government? Do you think that electing fascists will accelerate the collapse of the state and then a more progressive ideology will rise from the ashes? Are you just cool with what the Republican party looks like right now and the way that they govern?

Do I need to specify that I'm not saying you should vote for every Democrat no matter what and that you really should consider candidates as individuals?

I guess I see the Democratic party as a deeply flawed party (with abysmally out of touch leadership) that needs serious reform and I see the Republican party as a cult of christofascist fucks that need to be defeated before they completely erode individual rights and entrench their own power for generations.

So yes. I get the contradiction in saying "You should vote for one of the two parties in order to create a political landscape where it is possible to one day move beyond the two-party system". Partisanship makes everything harder. But if you really think both parties are the same and that it doesn't matter which one you pick then I don't know what to tell you.

No I completely get the problem there. It's going to be really hard to get electoral reform if there are no longer elections. So my focus is on preserving Democratic institutions long enough that maybe we can improve them. Obviously party leaders have no interest in seeing changes that threaten the duopoly, but there are Democrats (particularly at the state level) who have been open to reforms like rank choice voting.

If suddenly Republicans stop attacking the rule of law, checks and balances, gerrymandering districts, overriding voters, and coddling white nationalists then maybe their party would be capable of enacting positive change as well.

If you have some secret third choice that can change the system without bloodshed or voting for one of the two parties I'm all ears. If you're going to tell me to vote third party then I'd like you to show me how you think a third party candidate can win the presidency because that's never happened and it's never even been close.