this post was submitted on 07 Aug 2025
543 points (99.3% liked)

World News

49112 readers
1773 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Government sources confirmed in early August 2025 that preliminary contacts had been indefinitely suspended.

Spain’s decision to cancel the F-35 acquisition was driven by a mix of budgetary rules, industrial policy, and strategic concerns.

The government’s €10.471 billion defense plan requires that 85% of funds be invested in European programs, making the U.S.-built F-35 incompatible with current spending priorities. Although Spain had allocated €6.25 billion in 2023 for a fighter to replace the AV-8B Harrier and C-15M Hornets, and had submitted a non-binding Request for Information, those steps were suspended.

Officials cited restricted access to the F-35’s critical systems, which limits national control and prevents integration of local technologies. The cost of the necessary infrastructure to maintain the aircraft and a unilateral price increase were also cited as negative factors.

The government aims to avoid dependence on non-European suppliers and instead support European initiatives like the Eurofighter and FCAS, aligning procurement with industrial participation and strategic autonomy objectives.

The decision also aligns with Prime Minister Pedro Sánchez’s resistance to NATO’s 5% GDP defense spending target, limiting the government’s financial flexibility while reinforcing its emphasis on European defense autonomy.

top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Tja@programming.dev 9 points 6 days ago

That's great news. Airbus has shown they can build airplanes given enough budget, it can definitely translate to military planes as well. If not, French or Swedish industries can profit from it.

[–] d00phy@lemmy.world 55 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s almost like going around spouting “America First” everywhere got other countries thinking, “What about us first?” Maybe those dirty “globalists” had a point.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 39 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not just that but there is evidence that the US intentionally feature limits planes that they sell to foreign governments, to the point that they can disable them remotely.

How any government can trust US made planes is beyond me.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure a remote disable is even needed, if they can just withhold spare parts.

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 week ago

FYI the word “globalist” doesn’t mean “person who thinks globally”, it is just a 1-1 replacement for “the Jews”.

[–] kokesh@lemmy.world 38 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The whole world should stop buying stuff from usa, we should let tRump marinate in his own juices.

[–] random_character_a@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The pedophile has been already festering in his bile for so long he has turned sickly orange.

[–] Deflated0ne@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Father Nurgle loves him for that.

[–] Usernamealreadyinuse@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why isn't that happening?You don't have to be nice to a bully?!? It's probably money but can someone eli5 this to me? Are we so dependent on everything American? Or is this a long game, wait this storm out?

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 4 points 6 days ago

Europe doesn't have the manufacturing capacity to arm Ukraine. It has the know-how but it just doesn't produce enough arms. Why? Because they thought they don't need it. Europe thought that in a case of any conflict US will help it so they just need to bare minimum of everything. Now that they realized USA is not a reliable partner (about 8 years too late if you ask me) they are trying to expand their capacity but it's really difficult and will take years. You have to build the factories, hire and train workers, find new sources of raw materials, figure out how to transport it... On top of that USA realizes what is happening so they are putting pressure on everyone to keep buying American weapons. The trade deal requires Europe to buy billions worth of arms from USA so now they have to invest money in local production while spending it in USA at the same time.

How did we get here? Shortsighted and corrupt leaders, especially in Germany.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 3 points 6 days ago

Ask the average Joe to stop buying coke, you will have your answer.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 2 points 6 days ago

Like, iphones, Coke, McDonalds and Facebook, WhatsApp and on and on ?

[–] hubobes@sh.itjust.works 34 points 1 week ago

At least some good news, back home in Switzerland our government is cowering before Trump, reassuring him that we will buy the F-35 even though they just put a flat 39% tariff on us...they even flew to Washington to improve our offer, whatever that means, fucking cowards.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago

Hopefully Canada follows suit.

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Great decision. It will be interesting to see what they will get now. From what I've read the only options were F-35 or Eurofighters and they said they will not buy Eurofighters because they already have those and don't want to rely on a single platform that much.

This is only an issue for the Navy that has single light aircraft carrier. It currently launches Harriers but those will be decommissioned by UK soon and Spain will be last country still using them. Recently they announced plans to build two more light aircraft carriers and one full scale one. So they can try using Harriers a bit longer, wait for the full scale aircraft carrier or buy some Eurofighters just for the navy. Even if the navy will lose the ability to deploy fighter jets I don't think it will be a big issue for Spain. They are not planning any middle east invasions anytime soon.

[–] sucius@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Spain is going to wait for FCAS which it is part of but I don't know if the navy can wait that long

[–] AstaKask@lemmy.cafe 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Perhaps a certain winged lion would be of interest, mi amigo?

[–] RaivoKulli@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

What's that

E: Ah the Saab one