this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
540 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

75792 readers
2747 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 13 points 11 hours ago

Just look at who's in charge of the Senate, and ask yourself if they are to be trusted to do anything but lie, steal and carry out witch hunts.

As for LLMs, unless driving contact-centre customer satisfaction scores even further through the floor counts as an achievement, so far, all there's been has been a vast volume of hype and wasted energy, and very little to show for it, except for some highly constrained point solutions which aren't significant enough to make economic impact. Even then, the ROI is questionable.

[–] _stranger_@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

So they want to keep them terrified of losing their shitty, barely functioning status quo.

The reality is that these are the numbers the Republicans want , because it's the numbers their billionaire owners want. ChatGPT is just accidentally letting us know how they've poisoned the models.

[–] MonkderVierte@lemmy.zip 8 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (1 children)

Stop calling LLM AI. It creates false expectations.

[–] innermachine@lemmy.world 2 points 6 hours ago

The fact that "AI" training off other LLM slop produces worse and worse results is proof there is no "intelligence" going on just clever parroting.

[–] Smoogs@lemmy.world 13 points 15 hours ago

Yes but got forbid those jobs be stolen by another country. Can’t have that.

[–] Jaysyn@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

I.e., made up on the spot.

[–] jaybone@lemmy.zip 32 points 1 day ago (1 children)

LOLLLLLLLL that’s like a third of the US population. Probably half of the number currently employed. There’s no way in hell this useless garbage will take 1/3 to 1/2 of all jobs. Companies that do this will go out of business fast.

[–] skisnow@lemmy.ca 9 points 11 hours ago

You can tell how competent someone is at something by how good they think AI is at that thing.

[–] DamnianWayne@lemmy.world 1 points 11 hours ago

Well my AI says it will take 96 or 98 million jobs, depending on what you want it say and only for $5,000.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 55 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (9 children)

I think the fad will die down a bit, when companies figure out that AI will be more likely than humans to make very expensive mistakes that the company has to compensate, and saying it was the AI is not a valid cop out.
I foresee companies will go bankrupt on that account.

It doesn't help to save $100k on cutting away an employee, if the AI causes damages for 10 or 100 times that amount.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When the bubble bursts, whoever is left standing is going to have to jack prices through the roof to put so much as a dent in their outlay. Their outlay so far. Can't see many companies hanging in there at that point.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Not if the IP is purchased by another company leaving the original saddled with the debt, or spun off so the parent company can rebuy it thusly, or the government bails them out, or buys it to be the State AI too, or a bunch of other scenarios in this dark new world ahead.

[–] TronBronson@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

That’s my favorite part. All the stolen IP.

[–] a4ng3l@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I put my money on AI act here in Europe and the willingness of local authorities to make a few examples. That would help bringing some accountability here and there and stir a bit the pot. Eventually, as AI commodities, it will be less in the light. That will also help.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] latenightnoir@lemmy.blahaj.zone 83 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (3 children)

This is how AI will take over... not through wars or competence, but by being better at bureaucratic forgeries...

Edit: well, I guess the apple never falls far from the tree, as it were! Wa-hey! We wanted to create the ultimate worker, but we've managed to create the ultimate politician instead=))

[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 4 points 16 hours ago

It's easy when the first line of every reply is "oh, you're so goddamn smart. Holy shit, are you the smartest person in the world for asking that question?..."

https://youtu.be/TuEKb9Ktqhc

[–] Gullible@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 day ago (2 children)

AI politicians might be the move after next.

Corporate personhood(you are here) ->
Corporation self advocates ->
Corporations run for office

I don’t like this future. I’d like to go back.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 23 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And over the next 50 years it will take 485 million jobs, and the unemployment rate will be 235%.

[–] architect@thelemmy.club 3 points 18 hours ago (1 children)
[–] popekingjoe@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago

Here's hoping!

[–] Zephorah@discuss.online 33 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Thus demonstrating the crux of the issue.

I was just looking for a name of a historical figure associated with the Declaration of Independence but not involved in the writing of it. Elizabeth Powel. Once I knew the name, I went through the ai to see how fast they’d get it. Duck.ai confidently gave me 9 different names, including people who were born on 1776 or soon thereafter and could not have been historically involved in any of it. I even said not married to any of the writers and kept getting Abagail Adams and the journalist, Goddard. It was continually distracted by “prominent woman” and would give Elizabeth Cady Stanton instead. Twice.

Finally, I gave the ai a portrait. It took the ai three tries to get the name from the portrait, and the portrait is the most used one under the images tab.

It was very sad. I strongly encourage everyone to test the ai. Easy to grab wikis that would be top of the search anyway are making the ai look good.

[–] merc@sh.itjust.works 19 points 1 day ago

If you understand how LLMs work, that's not surprising.

LLMs generate a sequence of words that makes sense in that context. It's trained on trillions(?) of words from books, Wikipedia, etc. In most of the training material, when someone asks "what's the name of the person who did X?" there's an answer, and that answer isn't "I have no fucking clue".

Now, if it were trained on a whole new corpus of data that had "I have no fucking clue" a lot more often, it would see that as a reasonable thing to print sometimes so you'd get that answer a lot more often. However, it doesn't actually understand anything. It just generates sequences of believable words. So, it wouldn't generate "I have no fucking clue" when it doesn't know, it would just generate it occasionally when it seemed like it was an appropriate time. So, you'd ask "Who was the first president of the USA?" and it would sometimes say "I have no fucking clue" because that's sometimes what the training data says a response might look like when someone asks a question of that form.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Grandwolf319@sh.itjust.works 32 points 1 day ago (2 children)

If you have a job that you can be confidently wrong without any self awareness after the fact, then yeah I guess.

But I can’t think of many jobs like that except something that is mostly just politics.

[–] Blackfeathr@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Don't forget the vast majority of CEOs.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 21 points 1 day ago (4 children)

funny... i expected IT workers to be in that list but we're not. AI couldn't do my job but it could be my boss and that frightens me.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)
[–] thisbenzingring@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 hours ago

I'm thinking William Gibson probably gets it right with the Neuromancer story

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

I drove Amazon Flex during Covid, having an AI as your boss is deeply and perpetually unsettling but ultimately doable! Just do what the push notification tells you to do. If you want to say something to your boss, use the feedback form on the corporate website. So simple.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] weirdbeardgame@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago

The Senate will decide its fate.

[–] tidderuuf@lemmy.world 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Knowing the way our country is going I would expect in the end workers will have to pay an AI tax on their income and most workers will start working 50 hours a week.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›