this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2025
154 points (89.3% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
2771 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cecilkorik@lemmy.ca 62 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Librewolf. You're welcome.

[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Has anyone figured out how to automate updates on macOS (ew I know, but it's my wife's computer)?

[–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I just use homebrew with quarantine disabled (otherwise homebrew will auto-update the package with quarantine enabled again, even if you installed it without).

I don't like macs. Just have to use one for work.

[–] paequ2@lemmy.today 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Aaah, ok. I read the docs at https://librewolf.net/installation/macos/#homebrew but got scared when I saw "flagged as broken". I'll give it a shot anyway, thanks!

[–] Ghoelian@piefed.social 2 points 2 weeks ago

Homebrew has announced they're gonna stop supporting disabling quarantine. Which means I'm gonna stop using Homebrew, as most of their reasoning didn't make much sense besides "daddy Apple doesn't like it".

[–] Carighan@piefed.world 1 points 1 month ago

Oh that's a fork that's explicitly about having less options for the user then?

[–] berty@feddit.org 51 points 2 months ago

So it's just another search engine option, they probably get money for that too. No big deal for me, I don't have to use it if I don't want to.

[–] sramder@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (6 children)

Because it costs money to add shit nobody wants so we need sponsors, to add more shit nobody wants…

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] firepenny@lemmy.world 27 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Why does AI need to be shoved into everything, honestly its not AI its just an LLM that summarizes your search, and plays as a yes man.

[–] Atherel@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 months ago

It's totally "shoved" when it's just an additional option in the search engine sélection...

[–] nialv7@lemmy.world 12 points 2 months ago

I mean, if this helps fund Firefox and is not too intrusive then I am fine with it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I’m not upvoting out of support for this move but to spread awareness

[–] goatinspace@feddit.org 8 points 2 months ago

Voting is confusing

[–] FaceDeer@fedia.io 4 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Whereas I'm upvoting because I support adding options. If you don't like it, don't use it.

[–] jqubed@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

I really don’t know enough about Perplexity AI to have an opinion one way or another, which is why I’m upvoting for awareness. I can’t say whether it’s a good or bad thing, although I’m not optimistic given the general trend of shoehorning “AI” in whether it makes sense or not, but I’m sure there are actually useful applications for the product and a better search engine could be one. I want actual search results, though, not a generated slop answer.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] root@lemmy.world 20 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] Little8Lost@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

I prefer waterfox but i normally use them booth as they are awesome (one just with the basic addons and the other with all the addons i want but they could break websites)

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 19 points 2 months ago (1 children)

How about not adding more AI shit instead?

[–] chronicledmonocle@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago

It's just a search engine choice.

I agree with the sentiment, but this is quite possibly the least offensive idea Mozilla has had in a while.

[–] HertzDentalBar@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 2 months ago (1 children)

This is just a search engine option not some built in AI tool.

No issue here other than fuck AI in general. Just don't use it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NuXCOM_90Percent@lemmy.zip 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I get that Mozilla needs to keep the lights on but... yeah.

I've increasingly been meaning to switch to a fork. Anyone aware of a good way to self host a bookmark (and preferably tab) sync?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Firefox adding another search engine choice isn't really headline news to me but cool I guess, especially if it's another option that's not Google?

I'll continue using something else, though.

[–] LastYearsIrritant@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 month ago

You can also manually add or remove search engines (at least in current Mozilla releases)

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Resplendent606@piefed.social 10 points 2 months ago

Another reason not to use vanilla Firefox.

[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (2 children)

pretty easy to just remove it as an option. settings/search/ scroll down to list of search engines, click perplexity, click remove. If enough people do this, maybe they will get the hint.

[–] Limonene@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How do I prevent new antifeatures from being added? How do I even know about the new antifeatures as they are added? Does Mozilla publish an RSS feed of each antifeature like this that they add, that gives a quick explanation of how to undo it?

[–] letsgo2themall@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago

idk if they have an rss or not. I always click the what's new link when they push an upgrade.

[–] Nalivai@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Thankfully it's easy to remove yet. But this sneaky automatic addition is still annoying.

[–] Fizz@lemmy.nz 7 points 2 months ago

Good to see some diversification away from google.

[–] circledot@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

They should listen to Meredith Whittaker (German) the boss of Signal.

[–] boogiebored@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] circledot@feddit.org 3 points 2 months ago

I changed it, should work now.

[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

I have no idea why they call it "integration"? It's just a search option like any other search option.
Personally I have 10 search options enabled already, so this is number 11, and if I don't like it, I will just disable it, which is dead easy to do, with a button for the purpose of changing settings right beside the search options.

I tried it for 2 terms I know very well, and the response was very good, but I would never trust an AI response without double checking.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ones that work well take your natural language input, spend time searching and offer results. Not summarize anything. How well does perplexity work in that regard I wonder?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BCBoy911@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 months ago

Boooooo. I hope Mozilla is at least getting paid a shit ton of AI money for this.

load more comments
view more: next ›