Many have tried, and many have failed to sue them due to a lack of evidence.
There has been no new evidence btw.
this post was submitted on 28 Oct 2025
745 points (98.7% liked)
Not The Onion
18480 readers
1972 users here now
Welcome
We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!
The Rules
Posts must be:
- Links to news stories from...
- ...credible sources, with...
- ...their original headlines, that...
- ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”
Please also avoid duplicates.
Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.
And that’s basically it!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
it isn't lawsuit in a traditional way.
there's no law in this country anymore. they are asking for a bribe
As usual our AG is being an ass
Hopefully Tylenol sues texas back for being malicious idiots.
So many supposed leftists triggered that a big pharma corporation is being sued. Pathetic.
we can all agree that big corporate pharma sucks, but also that this lawsuit is bullshit.
it isn't really a lawsuit, just asking for a bribe.
This timeline is so fucked that J & J somehow managed to be the good guy for once..
Less the good guy, more a target of a bad guy.
Wait the state is suing the company? Shouldn't it be the other way around? The company suing the CDC and RFK Jr. personally due to the clearly slanderous statements?
Johnson and Johnson is a huge, multinational pharma company with more money than God. They aren't going to be intimidated or extorted by this dumbass governor.
This case will get tossed in the discovery phase when the judge asks for scientific evidence and all the governor can provide are these whoo-whoo dipsh*t theories.
They're being sneaky.
As attorney general, Paxton has a different avenue into court than an individual trying to prove that Tylenol caused their child’s autism. While those lawsuits focus on personal injury claims, this suit hinges on two state consumer protection laws, the Uniform Fraudulent Transfer Act and the Deceptive Trade Practices Act.
“That overlaps a lot with the science and with the argument that is going on about Tylenol right now, but it’s ultimately a different burden of proof and different damages that we’re going to be seeking,” Keller said.
Not if the judge has been appointed by R.
Hillbilly Tyrannical Fascist Government
VS
Monopolistic Corrupt Big Pharma Corporation
Who would win?
Stay tuned!
Pharma. Regardless of who's involved, being able to sue somebody based on made up bullshit is not a good precedent
Yes, but when was the last time these guys cared about "precedent"? I agree in thinking Pharma wins, but only because money. One CEO visit to the Whitehouse and some brown nosing and Trump will start saying how they're "good people".
We have always been at war with Eastasia.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I read this as "Tylenol sues Texas for libal"
Took me a few re-reads to understand the idiots spreading the libel are the ones suing. They're gonna get counter-sued real fast.
Unfortunate that the tax payers will shoulder the burden.
Edit: this is a strange way for a company to get a government subsidiary:
- lobby stupid politicians to sue you for stupid reasons
- countersue.
- ...
- Profit.
Well, some lawyers are about to make a shit load of money as this drags out for a decade.
Texas failing once again at using facts and science. They love to shoot themselves in the foot and blame others for making the gun that shot them.
Is there any science proving this? Could I sue "Buckley's Cough Syrup" because of my gut feeling that they caused my toenail fungus?
It's in the article. The short answer is NO.
Short answer no. Also correlation is not causation Let's say child autism is correlated with infection at a certain age then it could be the infection and not the thing you took for the infection.
They are dumb fucks who cannot read studies. Remember COVID?
a buddy of mine got a flu shot and then while walking out of the pharmacy he was hit by a car. Coincidence? No way.
No, because in a court of law, your feelings aren't the thing that matters. :)
load more comments
(1 replies)
There's no controversy in the health community!!! There's no link between acetaminophen and autism, period!
Can’t help but notice you used exclamation marks instead of periods. Sincerely, the pedantic community.
You can put an exclamation point at the end of any sentence instead of a period! Multiple exclamation points are also acceptable!!!
It actually isn't. This time.
Grifters have to make up the losses from Trump somehow.
God I hope texas eats a big old pharma dick on this one. I feel like they're just anti women at this point.
load more comments
(1 replies)
I’m not a lawyer but shouldn’t J&J be suing the Federal Government for making utterly unsubstantiated claims in an official announcement?
I think they’re waiting for the damages to really rack up. Then they can sue the taxpayer for billions and nobody can stop them.
We could put on a really big tinfoil hat and say that this is all a plan to funnel billions of taxpayer dollars to J&J by way of crafting an airtight lawsuit for them to win and get awarded an absolutely massive payout.
load more comments
(2 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
Tylenol is basically paracetamol, right? It's a generic drug. Why are they suing a specific brand?
Same exact drug, just branding.
It's because our batshit crazy administration decided to wage war against that particular brand, I suspect they refused to donate their million dollars to the pres' slush-fund.
Also, Trump can pronounce "Tylenol", but he stumbles over "acetaminophen" and "paracetamol". That press conference was pretty funny. We have an executive who can't say words with more than three syllables.
load more comments
(18 replies)
view more: next ›