this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2025
740 points (97.2% liked)

World News

50787 readers
1596 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] RedFrank24@lemmy.world 63 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Venture capitalist Bradley Tusk told LBC: “If Elon Musk says he needs a trillion dollars because he's going to solve global hunger or something like that, great, have at it. But I don’t know what you could possibly buy with a trillion dollars that you couldn't buy with a hundred billion, or probably even $10 billion.”

Well at least he's aware of how much money a trillion dollars is and how easy it would be to solve world hunger.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He once said that if there was a concrete plan to solve world hunger he would do it. Then a representative of an actual plan to solve world hunger showed up on his Twitter feed and provided him with information and he was like 'nah'.

And the plan would only cost a small amount of his fortune. He bought Twitter for much, much more.

[–] Zink@programming.dev 8 points 4 days ago (2 children)

I think it was only like 6 billion, right?

A huge number on its own, but in this context it's nothing.

He paid 44 billion for Twitter and it took him a few days to raise that much money. He could have been the man to write the cheque to end world hunger and be honored by millions for generations to come (despite all his other bullshit), but he chose not to.

The world starves not because we cannot feed the hungry, but because we cannot satisfy the rich.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] olbaidiablo@lemmy.ca 20 points 4 days ago (1 children)

He isn't wrong. All it takes is the right amount of people to be pissed and revolution explodes. If the oligarchs think they have it rough now, wait until they are being lynched in the street by people who haven't eaten a decent meal in recent memory. Look up 1918 Russia if you don't believe me.

[–] Regrettable_incident@lemmy.world 14 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I somehow feel things have changed. Maybe it's the internet, lack of education, consumerism, whatever. I hate to say this, bit I feel like a lot of people, when they get hungry, would steal from their neighbours. Far too many folk don't understand that the wealthy are the author of their suffering and won't know where to target their anger. Not to mention that oligarchs are hard to catch, whereas your neighbour with a slightly newer car is right there, and may be of a different race. People don't understand who they should be angry with.

[–] Holytimes@sh.itjust.works 12 points 4 days ago

If there is still food to be stolen from your neighbours then things haven't reached the point of revolt.

If there is still enough energy to be expended on hating your neighbor, then you haven't reached the true point of revolt

When things are truly at their worst, your neighbor has no food to take. Your neighbor has no goods worth stealing. Harming them brings you no food, no money and less energy.

When things have reached that point, that is when the only option left is revolt and it does not matter what consumerism what gifts are given what lies are said. The only thing left to do is revolt or die. And no group of people will simply choose to die.

[–] Olhonestjim@lemmy.world 61 points 5 days ago (4 children)

Millionaire CEO? Who is this broke bitch?

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 16 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Lmao I’m thinking the same! Like damn he’s struggling with us normal folks in the trenches!

[–] meep_launcher@sh.itjust.works 24 points 5 days ago (5 children)

I mean the millionaire class is a grey area between those who are so rich they are completely out of touch with working class realities, and those who were working class who got a break and played a good hand right.

Personally I don't really have a problem with millionaires, that's an amount you can make playing by the rules and not bending them to your own will.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 26 points 5 days ago

Plus it just means "homeowner" in way too many cities.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] aarch0x40@lemmy.world 202 points 6 days ago (5 children)

A repeat of the French Revolution is the real reason behind the bunkers of the ultra wealthy.

[–] Bbbbbbbbbbb@lemmy.world 95 points 6 days ago (18 children)

I hope they enjoy staying in that bunker forever instead of the surface world

[–] Arghblarg@lemmy.ca 93 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Somewhere, somehow, those bunkers will need air intakes. Some potatoes to plug tubes, or mustard gas packets down the hatches ... the problem is, bunkers make excellent prisons and/or tombs.

[–] ChicoSuave@lemmy.world 49 points 6 days ago (13 children)

The ultra wealthy also don't do shit in their own and will be expecting at least a small team of other people to cater to them while they weather the storm. There is no future where the ultra wealthy get to keep all the things they have collected.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] ininewcrow@lemmy.ca 45 points 6 days ago (3 children)

An easy way to avoid anything like the French Revolution ... or any kind of revolution ... is to just feed people.

You can do whatever you want, abuse people, jail people, arrest people, even start a war, build concentration camps and for the most part people will go along with it all, as long as you keep them fed. You don't even have to feed them much ... just keep them fed enough to keep them from rioting and revolting.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] thefrozenorth@sh.itjust.works 66 points 5 days ago (6 children)

The US govt shutdown is a distraction. The real story is the generals being fired by Hegseth. When they are replaced by Trump loyalists, the real civil war will begin. The goal of Project 2025 is to install a white supremacist evangelical ruling class in power. They have already published everything they want to do, all you have to do is look.

[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 25 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Nothing is just a distraction. They're all just similarly evil parts of the plan, that they have fully documented, and that people just kinda keep ignoring.

[–] ameancow@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (2 children)

For there to be any kind of real "civil war" there would need to be a very clear distinction between sides and goals alongside states declaring their intent for sovereignty, as well and would need some form of oppositional army with organization.

The USA is far, far from a real civil war. We're talking a generation or more and that's in the worst case timeline.

The terms people need to recognize and understand are "militarized police state" and "civil unrest."

These conditions may lead to a civil war at some point, but so far the bickering between states that don't want Trump to do this and that are nothing remotely close to the conditions that start a civil war.

I get it, we want something to happen. We want retribution and justice and some kind of satisfying pushback. But I don't think it's helpful for any of us to "Tim Pool" the situation and try to pound the war-drums so we normalize violence. The current situation can and most likely will start facing mitigation during the mid-terms if there's no authoritarian takeover. Right now, even if that happens, you would see rioting and possibly even a coup long, LONG before you would see a civil war.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ristoril_zip@lemmy.zip 129 points 6 days ago (48 children)

The crazy thing is millionaires have more on common with us normal workers than they do with billionaires.

Hasan Piker was listing all kinds of "a million _____ is _____ but a BILLION ______ is [some ufathomably larger thing].

People don't understand multiplication very well...

[–] prex@aussie.zone 110 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The difference between a million and a billion is about a billion.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] SoloCritical@lemmy.world 70 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If you were to count 1 second, every second, until you reached one million. It will have taken you roughly 11 days.

If you were to count 1 second, every second, until you reached one billion. It will have taken you over 33 years.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (46 replies)
[–] PissingIntoTheWind@lemmy.world 13 points 4 days ago

No shit. This is my retirement plan.

[–] libre_warrior@lemmy.ml 18 points 4 days ago

Lets hope he is right.

[–] Knoxer@lemmy.world 17 points 4 days ago (1 children)

People are too divided for an Actual revolution, but I'd say let's try

[–] group_hug@sh.itjust.works 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Internet echo chambers are literally "Divide and Conquer" at scale.

Wake me up when the masses give up their algorithmic app addictions.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HugeNerd@lemmy.ca 10 points 4 days ago

Please collapse in an orderly fashion, form a queue or something. But don't come up here, we're full.

[–] Thedogdrinkscoffee@lemmy.ca 94 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (2 children)

Millionaire? Wow, Newsweek is really slumming it these days.

10 years from now: Homeowner CEO says ...

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 39 points 6 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Lushed_Lungfish@lemmy.ca 33 points 5 days ago

Don't threaten us with a good time...

[–] Mrkawfee@feddit.uk 14 points 4 days ago

I've been waiting for the pitchforks since 2008.

[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)
[–] Credibly_Human@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago (27 children)

People, you've gotta stop waiting for a revolution.

Any "solution" that starts with "you first" and involves fighting against forces that vastly out gun you, with people you absolutely would not agree to fight with is a complete non starter.

You have to realize that even if such a revolution happened, after it happened, they'd just pick the same systems that lead to that result.

You want a hail mary but you will not get it.

The practical buckleys tagline solution you all hate but is the only one that works is supporting the fuck out of the democrats in not only the short term (to stop so many people from being harmed), but in the long term too, this way they can't just use the right as an excuse to go to the right. All that time, youll need to replace the old guard with more progressive members through overwhelming support in primaries, and being active in state and local politics.

Thats the only way forward where you can win, and its a lot more feasible and less painful than any revolution fantasies. In any of those fantasies, its more likely your head rolls than any of the ghouls we all hate.

[–] TheMinister@sh.itjust.works 23 points 5 days ago

No one is coming to save us. We are the ones we’ve been waiting for.

load more comments (26 replies)
[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 37 points 5 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MourningDove@lemmy.zip 16 points 5 days ago

Fingers crossed that if it does, people will see it as what happens when you let the clowns control the circus and the Terrorist Party never sees themselves in a position of authority ever again.

[–] IndustryStandard@lemmy.world 28 points 5 days ago (2 children)

So you are saying there is hope

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 26 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Hey the french revolution was also about the fact that the government was a scandal ridden shitshow of petty internal politics and stupid interpersonal games.

…oh no, Bastille day approaches huh?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 31 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Trump is counting on it to declare martial law and never have another election.

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 6 days ago (7 children)

You say that...like that changes anything.

He's already declared martial law by sending in military units to cities. He's already done it.

What the fuck do we have to lose?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Wilco@lemmy.zip 13 points 5 days ago

One can hope.

[–] Triasha@lemmy.world 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Well off working man warns the capitalist class the consequences of stiffing the working class.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NatakuNox@lemmy.world 27 points 6 days ago
[–] manicseasons@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Eat the rich and use their money so there is no poverty in the world anymore.

[–] reksas@sopuli.xyz 7 points 4 days ago (1 children)

and do something to prevent new people from taking their place so the problem doesnt just start again with different people

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] orioler25@lemmy.world 9 points 5 days ago

Damn, I wonder if anyone else has noticed this. 😳

load more comments
view more: next ›