this post was submitted on 18 Apr 2025
431 points (98.9% liked)

Selfhosted

46265 readers
383 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Synology's telegraphed moves toward a contained ecosystem and seemingly vertical integration are certain to rankle some of its biggest fans, who likely enjoy doing their own system building, shopping, and assembly for the perfect amount of storage. "Pro-sumers," homelab enthusiasts, and those with just a lot of stuff to store at home, or in a small business, previously had a good reason to buy one Synology device every so many years, then stick into them whatever drives they happened to have or acquired at their desired prices. Synology's stated needs for efficient support of drive arrays may be more defensible at the enterprise level, but as it gets closer to the home level, it suggests a different kind of optimization.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] redpandabeer@feddit.org 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

Actually perfect timing (for me, it's all in all terrible)... I was about to buy myself a NAS and struggled to figure out which to get, and this removes at least one option.

Honestly if you're comfortable with Linux I just built my own at this point, but if you're not then obviously don't take my advice

[–] draenog@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

As I read this, I am just transfering over to TrueNas on totally open hardware (from Synology). After 1 week, I am loving it. A bit of a learning curve, but TrueNas seems really nice and solid.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Well, I had been considering one, but I guess not

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 5 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It sucks, because all things considered, they're great little devices. I really like mine.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

That's what I've heard... Getting real tired of people building great products only for corpos to find a way to make it terrible for an extra buck

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago
[–] ToiletFlushShowerScream@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Damn it I already own own one. I guess I funded this cunt corporate move

[–] FlyingSpaceCow@lemmy.ca 3 points 5 days ago

Me too. Invested in my setup last year :(

[–] M0oP0o@mander.xyz 6 points 5 days ago

Such a silly move. Like shooting yourself in the foot to sell more bullets

[–] blacklisted@lemmy.org 5 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I had Synology for a second but built my own server, went UnRAID, and never looked back.

[–] j0ester@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

This is the way.

[–] stankcheez@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

Started messing around with docker containers on a small Synology box a few years ago, dumped Synology with a quickness in favor of just building an Ubuntu-based NAS. I’m running TrueNAS Scale bare metal now and getting ready to dump it to go back to another roll-my-own Linux + ZFS setup, possibly using Cockpit and the ZFS extensions from 45 drives.

[–] ZeldaFreak@lemmy.world 3 points 5 days ago

Yeah I expected that this would happen. They already did this with RAM. They just rebrand RAM, sell it for a way higher price and add a check. When they brought their own branded HDDs, I knew they will pull of the same scam.

Building an own server isn't that more expensive and you don't have to deal with the whole lockout with Synology. For example I had quite the issue to access hardware. I wasn't able to get Home Assistant running on my NAS. The issue was my Zigbee USB Stick. I got it running to the point where I was able to send commands (e.g. turn on or off lights) but the status didn't came back. I threw it on my Pi3 (now Pi5) and zero issues.

The next NAS is self build. Probably Proxmox as base, with truenas or so as main server and the rest depends on what I might need.

[–] ClydapusGotwald@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

I have a synology I bought 3rd party ram (not synology) and it works fine. Same with drives just bought some seagate drives. Probably going to upgrade from a 4 bay to a 12 and I don’t see compatibility of ram being an issue. I just don’t feel like building a whole racked system I just want to plug and play and forget. As of now tho only thing I lose is warranty cause I’m using not “certified” ram and drives.

[–] pineapple@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

For me at least I never considered a synology nas it seemed like the apple of home servers. Especially when I enjoy building machines anyway there was no point. Although I can definitely see the appeal for some people.

I wonder if there are more open solutions that don't require building a machine from scratch.

[–] Xartle@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 days ago

I'm not saying that they won't do this, but so far their actual actions have ended up pretty decent. I've had 3 Synology devices over the last 12(?) years, and while they are not perfect, they have been very good at delivering what they promised over the long haul. All of them still work fine. Even the old guy delivers.

[–] nerdschleife@lemm.ee 122 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It’s like they don’t understand their demographic.

[–] alvvayson@lemmy.dbzer0.com 61 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah, I think their CEO might have QNAP stock or something.

It's hilarious how dumb this is.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 33 points 1 week ago (2 children)

They absolutely do. But it's a symptom of capitalism. They must seek higher and higher profits each year. And this is one of their ideas to seek higher profits....

[–] BastingChemina@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The worst is that it will probably increase profit or a quarter or too while running the brand to the ground.

[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

That's capitalism, baby! /s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] root@lemmy.world 100 points 1 week ago (13 children)
load more comments (13 replies)
[–] Allero@lemmy.today 47 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

That's a massive shot in the foot.

As a Synology owner, I already had enough - they have arbitrarily cut customer support to sanctioned jurisdictions, leaving me without the support they promised and I expected when paying for a device.

Next one will definitely be built from the ground up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kyrgizion@lemmy.world 47 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The enshittification/rent seeking continues. Nothing is sacred.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 35 points 1 week ago (8 children)

I remember arguing with some nerd that this overpriced shit was not fucking worth it and my build based on old server parts I got from a local computer recycler was infinitely superior in every way

I wish I saved that post so I could reply with this link. I feel so validated. Never trust companies. It’s why I say you should never fuck with plex, even if it is a bit easier to deploy than Jellyfin.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] AustralianSimon@lemmy.world 31 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I get why they do this sort of thing but it didn't stop us re-adding video station and h265 support back into our Synos.

Someone already made a script to overwrite the existing compatible drive checker so someone will write a new script to fix the new one.

https://github.com/007revad/Synology_HDD_db

https://github.com/007revad/Video_Station_for_DSM_722

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] marauding_gibberish142@lemmy.dbzer0.com 28 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Synology is like Ubiquity in the self-hosted community: sure it's self-hosted, but it's definitely not yours. End of the day you get to deal with their decisions.

Terramaster lets you run your own OS on their machine. That's basically what a homelabber wants: a good chassis and components. I couldn't see a reason to buy a Synology after Terramaster and Ugreen started ramping out their product lines which let you run whatever OS you wanted. Synology at this point is for people who either don't know what they're doing or want to remain hands-off with storage management (which is valid; you don't want to do more work when you get home for work). Unfortunately, such customers are now out in the lurch, so TrueNAS or trust some other company to hold your data safe.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›