No, not in the slightest. She appropriated someone else's culture with the specific intent of demeaning them. The only point she was making was that she herself is exceptionally racist.
Australian Politics
A place to discuss Australia Politics.
Rules
This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.
Recommended and Related Communities
Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:
- Australia (general)
- Australian News
- World News (from an Australian Perspective)
- Aussie Environment
- Ask an Australian
- AusFinance
- Pictures
- AusLegal
- Aussie Frugal Living
- Cars (Australia)
- Coffee
- Chat
- Aussie Zone Meta
- bapcsalesaustralia
- Food Australia
Plus other communities for sport and major cities.
https://aussie.zone/communities
Inaction on racism and islamophobia isn't a senate stance I want to see...
On one hand I don't agree with the burqa and don't really think it’s based in Islam and there are plenty of Muslim communities don't that wear it. This however is not an acceptable approach. It’d be like appropriating a head wrap to protest Sikhs. You’re clearly not part of the religion/culture so it isn’t an appropriate method of protest. Also she’s not wearing it right? Like you can still see her legs?
Can we all agree that both sides of this debate suck?
Pauline Hanson is a racist bigot we shouldn’t be giving the time of day to; but as a tolerant society, we should also not tolerate or allow burka and niqab in a similar fashion to how we don’t allow motorcycle helmets and other headgear which fully obscures one’s face?
in a similar fashion to how we don’t allow motorcycle helmets and other headgear which fully obscures one’s face?
...these are allowed. In fact, it's illegal to ride a motorcycle without a motorcycle helmet.
I'm guessing you're talking about special or private places like banks, but that's not what Pauline Hanson was proposing, at all.
Yes, to clarify, I did mean wearing a motorcycle helmet while walking into a public or commercial space like a bank, supermarket, shopping centre etc.
I have no problems with hijab, shayla and other open/face head coverings as a self-expression of religious modesty - but at a point that ‘modesty’ is either no longer a personal choice (ie. imposed by pressure from family, friends, spiritual leaders), or begins to negatively impact public safety.
Such garments are no longer fit-for-purpose in an a progressive society such as ours.
supermarket, shopping centre etc
Why? Delivery drivers across Asia do it.
While I’ve only visited a few cities in mainland China, the food delivery drivers that I have see have all worn open-faced helmets like this:
m
As to why, apart from it being generally anti-social - it’s mainly because it’s a massive security issue, as the individual in question cannot be identified in the event of assault, theft or order crimes.
Did you come over in winter? I am in Urumqi and its quite common to see open-faced helmet with a scarf/necktube/jacket pulled over the mouth/nose, I also saw it in Korea and Vietnam.
You have cameras which presumably can see their bike liscense.
Then again, masking in public due to illness/air pollution is common over here, it would be weird to ban just delivery drivers from covering their faces.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=c4oe1EXro6s
In this case no, I skimmed the video but in this case I don't see her doing anything wrong
It's a bit ironic that the greens lady in the video is so loud and outraged about someone wearing a burqa, maybe because most people feel this way, just not about one particular person but all who wear it.
Unfortunately Nu Greens members have tied the party into a very odd spot, progressive and regressive simultaneously which is leading people to leave to labor, resulting in one of the saddest poll results ever:
The latest Guardian Essential poll also found One Nation’s primary vote has doubled to 13% since the May federal election, putting support for the hard-right party above the Greens.
Congrats to the greens, you played yourself
