this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2025
2 points (60.0% liked)

Australian Politics

1697 readers
20 users here now

A place to discuss Australia Politics.

Rules

This community is run under the rules of aussie.zone.

Recommended and Related Communities

Be sure to check out and subscribe to our related communities on aussie.zone:

Plus other communities for sport and major cities.

https://aussie.zone/communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 4 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dgriffith@aussie.zone 18 points 2 weeks ago

I can agree Pauline Hanson is a problematic individual

So problematic individuals shouldn't be punished by the collective? You know what happens then? A few problematic people muddy the waters and generally make it very difficult to actually get shit done.

just for that one stunt with that burqa

There are rules in the senate. They allow for structured and robust debate, but there are limits. You don't become a "problematic individual" with just the one stunt.

Ms. Hanson is - in my humble opinion - a shit-stirrer presenting views stuck in the 1950s that do not mesh well with 21st century geopolitics. Those views are popular with a small segment of the population and she knows it. Stunts like this give disproportionate attention to that small segment at the detriment to everyone else.

[–] eureka@aussie.zone 12 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Here is a copy of the censure motion (25 November 2025) which explains why they believe the censure was necessary. It's a short read, and explains that it wasn't just about the stunt:

https://www.aph.gov.au/~/media/EEC94CC7AC00476E9A80D151BD9CB504.ashx

Articles report the motion passed 55 votes to 5 (90%+) so it's fair to say this represents the parliament's standards.

Good addition. I've taken the screenshot because people need to read this. The video linked is fairly misleading due to its overblown language.

[–] INHALE_VEGETABLES@aussie.zone 10 points 2 weeks ago

She's done it twice though.