this post was submitted on 20 Apr 2025
201 points (98.6% liked)

World News

46090 readers
2971 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 34 points 5 days ago (2 children)

sorry y'all. i found this monkey paw and i just wanted to see what 1945 would look like in 4K

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 14 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I think you meant 1933.

Or maybe I just don't get the reference.

[–] AJ1@lemmy.ca 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

meh, VE Day, the rise of National Socialism, what's the difference?

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Works with 1984 or 1929 too.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 4 days ago

IRL 1984 was fine. America was still good; the Soviet Union didn't nuke us all

[–] metaStatic@kbin.earth 8 points 5 days ago (2 children)

ironically lower resolution than the original ... but hey it's in colour this time.

[–] MonkeMischief@lemmy.today 3 points 5 days ago

Well it's artificially upscaled, so it's like the original but appears to be superficially aping its qualities with no actual understanding of the source material.

[–] toy_boat_toy_boat@lemmy.world 2 points 5 days ago

incidentally, i'm introducing a new standard to the called "analogHD (IEEE 2062-6)". it's captured using this revolutionary new technology called "cellular photography". it's very granular.