this post was submitted on 13 Dec 2025
133 points (95.9% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
2493 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 23 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PushButton@lemmy.world 5 points 2 hours ago

Stack Overflow’s leadership emphasizes that this isn’t merely about monetization but about enhancing user experience.

As soon as I see someone says that ads "enhance" the user experience, I know they are full of shit.

[–] finalarbiter@lemmy.dbzer0.com 102 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Ads that pretend to be normal content are literally the fucking worst kind of ad and anyone who suggests implementing them should be dragged out back and shot.

Not surprised that stack exchange is doing this, given that they seem determined to drive away their entire userbase.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's the only way to cheat ad blockers

Plus, if you don't give a shit about your userbase and or long term goals, then who cares, right?

[–] Noja@sopuli.xyz 1 points 2 hours ago

No, it's not a way to cheat ad blockers. It's just to trick you.

[–] zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 day ago

And AI is not the cause, just one of the last nails of that coffin. I’m still pissed at the gatekeeping moderators, actively eliminating participation of new users. I tried to be part of it two times, got burned two times, turned away and just used it as an info source, rather than “wasting” time trying to help others.

[–] dan@upvote.au 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It's not uncommon on sites where a high proportion of the userbase uses an adblocker, as making ads look like and render using the same code as organic content (same CSS classes, etc) makes them harder to block.

[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 6 points 1 day ago

while maintaining transparency and user value

Yeah, that you'll lose.

[–] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 40 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I really hate the term native ad. It makes it sound like it isn't the worst thing ever invented.

It should instead be called invasive ads or undercover ads.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] ZiemekZ@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[–] hperrin@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 day ago

“Native ads“ literally means trying to trick your users into accidentally clicking an ad. Like unread email in Gmail that’s actually just an ad (spam).

[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Funding boost? Didn't they make a big deal with OpenAI or some other LLM provider like 6 months ago?

Edit: I looked it up and it was both Google and OpenAI, but more than a year ago. I guess that's what you get as LLM users use those instead of visiting your website, and non-LLM users stop contributing

Line must go up.

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm imagining code snippets that would actually download ads into applications people are writing. This would target those that copy/paste'd code without having any concept of what the code in question does.

[–] j4k3@piefed.world 7 points 1 day ago

Integrated into vibe now

[–] viking@infosec.pub 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Any "article" starting with the words "in the ever evolving world of"... Lost its credibility before it was even published.

God what an awful, awful time to be alive.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yeah “changing”, sure. But “evolving” implies things are changing for the ”better”, which they are not.

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

aiming to fund enhancements while maintaining transparency and user value. Critics fear erosion of trust and misinformation. This move reflects efforts to balance revenue with community integrity amid AI-driven industry shifts.

Pure business bullshit bingo.

[–] sfxrlz@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 1 day ago

By weaving ads into the natural flow of content, the platform hopes to deliver relevant promotions—think coding tools or job listings—directly to developers in their moment of need. This approach could foster a more symbiotic relationship between advertisers and the community, where sponsored content provides genuine value rather than interruption.

Mh, as usual ads will provide genuine value

[–] ohlaph@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

That's embarrassing.

Wow fuck these clowns

[–] Decq@lemmy.world -1 points 1 day ago

What's the point, don't ads pay per impression? Are there actually more than 5 people still using stackoverflow? I can't see how this would make them any money.