this post was submitted on 16 Dec 2025
740 points (93.3% liked)

Technology

77096 readers
3933 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 hours ago

Hahaha fuck Firefox. Been saying it for years. Used to be the goat. Hasn't been for a decade and a half.

[–] mazzilius_marsti@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

how would this afffect the forked versions like Waterfox, LibreWolf, IronFox? The AI part is a separated feature from mainline Firefox branch, so forks can choose not to include it?

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 29 points 4 hours ago (3 children)

Hey tech companies. Consumers do not want more AI, they want less of it. Maybe we just need to get the word out?

[–] SirEDCaLot@lemmy.today 10 points 4 hours ago

Exactly this. I would love to see just one tech company stand up and say we are not doing AI, our AI budget is $0 and our product will not ship with AI. If you really want to use AI with our system you can download a plug-in or something but we won't waste our time writing one.

They would get a million users overnight.

[–] SharkAttak@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 3 hours ago

But 'AI' is the cool word of the moment! All the AI peddlers say so in their sale pitches!

[–] Melvin_Ferd@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago
[–] kaotic@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago
[–] Bebopalouie@lemmy.ca 8 points 3 hours ago

Nope, time for a new browser.

[–] dewritoninja@pawb.social 6 points 4 hours ago

Welp, time to move to waterfox for good

[–] theacharnian@lemmy.ca 55 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

WTF man, I just want a fucking browser.

[–] Sine_Fine_Belli@lemmy.world 5 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

I recommend waterfox and the DuckDuckGo browser, at least those 2 are good at least

[–] Skankhunt420@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 hour ago

Ducks browser runs on chrome though I highly recommend using anything but that because it contributes to chromes monopoly over the web.

Really excited for Ladybird and to see what Servo ends up being used in. Sad to see what Firefox is doing.

[–] Jax@sh.itjust.works 11 points 7 hours ago

No you don't, now suck down your government mandated AI slop and say thank you — you philistine.

[–] mfed1122@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 4 hours ago

I just want to be able to group tabs on mobile 🥲

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 13 points 7 hours ago

I like to imagine that these CEOs just get like a million AI emails a day from alt accounts of Sam Altman begging them to put AI in everything and they're all too stupud to realize it.

[–] typicalDude778@sh.itjust.works 12 points 6 hours ago

LibreWolf all the way

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 44 points 10 hours ago (7 children)

First: Every product we build must give people agency in how it works. Privacy, data use, and AI must be clear and understandable. Controls must be simple. AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off. People should know why a feature works the way it does and what value they get from it.

That's a good idea to put first. Of course, like do no evil, priorities change, so we'll need to keep a close eye on this.

Second: our business model must align with trust. We will grow through transparent monetization that people recognize and value.

Transparent is good, but if he things he's going to add value to monetization, he's smoking crack. There's nothing we want from a browser that's not already provided by a plugin.

Third: Firefox will grow from a browser into a broader ecosystem of trusted software. Firefox will remain our anchor. It will evolve into a modern AI browser and support a portfolio of new and trusted software additions.

Nobody wants that. We already had all we wanted from them in trusted software.

[–] coriza@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

I don't know if that is the reason but I wonder if the recent ruling that made Firefox loose on the cash income from Google as a default search engine has them doing a similar type of deal with AI companies, even Google, like, Firefox has a built-in interface for AI and the backend you can choose but the default one is one that some AI company pay a fee to be.

If that is the case I think it is fine, it is like a wink-wink situation, you have to have it enabled by default and with a default provider for it to be worth something for someone to pay for the privilege, and then the users can simply change it be gone with it without affecting the payout. (Unless the pay or renew pay has some metric like use statistics)

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] RazTheCat@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

They have pushed me back to Vivaldi.

[–] pr0sp3kt@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 2 hours ago

Not open source.

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 2 points 5 hours ago

A non beneficial mutation at best.

[–] Diurnambule@jlai.lu 4 points 6 hours ago

That a way yo beat dead internet theory. Get IA hallucinate the web you browse and no need to webbrowser to have internet access.

[–] xartle@reddthat.com 42 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

I don't think anyone actually read the announcement, just the headline. Here was the new CEOs actual first point.

"First: Every product we build must give people agency in how it works. Privacy, data use, and AI must be clear and understandable. Controls must be simple. AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn off. People should know why a feature works the way it does and what value they get from it."

[–] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

By people he means other CEOs.

[–] Dazed_Confused@lemmy.world 41 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

AI should always be a choice — something people can easily turn ~~off~~ on. That's how it should be.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 9 points 9 hours ago (6 children)

I despise AI. I don't want it in my browser. If I want to use AI, I'll go to Mistral or Claude.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] matlag@sh.itjust.works 20 points 10 hours ago

First, there should be a survey on what users actually want, no?

Because if no one wants AI and it's "always a choice", what you really do is waste considerable resources with as the only results, more settings users have to go through before starting using their browsers.

[–] cupcakezealot@piefed.blahaj.zone 24 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

there is absolutely zero reason to put ai in firefox

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 16 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

Well hopefully the different forks have their ducks in a row to strip all these “features” out down the road. So glad I use LibreWolf and not Firefox proper anymore

load more comments
view more: next ›