this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
67 points (98.6% liked)

World News

46063 readers
2923 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] tiredofsametab@fedia.io 2 points 1 day ago

Do we have reactors that would work properly (or, my bigger worry, whose safety systems will work properly) in such a low-grav environment? I assume they don't mean the type that use heat from decay like old probes

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

For fucking what? Lol

Hey, let build an insanely expensive energy plant to build on earth that takes decades to construct and build it on the furthest land mass humans have ever traveled to. Oh and the land mass is like always exposed to direct sunlight, but fuck solar panels. Double oh oh AND the land mass has like zero protection from any fucking flying outerspace debris that could destroy it all.

[–] Noobnarski@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

It depends where you are on the moon, if you are not on the poles you will have almost 15 days of darkness.

Sure, solar panels are also a good option, but nuclear makes more sense in space than it does on earth, since costs to transport stuff into space are much higher, probably even higher than the power plant itself. So it makes sense to use the fuel with the highest power density.

And it's not that big of a deal if it breaks and spreads radioactivity, since you are exposed to lots of radioactivity on the moons surface anyway and the population will be much lower than here on earth.

That doesn't mean that nuclear on the moon will always make sense, but it is less stupid than you might think. Building new nuclear power plants for power production on earth is stupid though imo.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Do they need to protect it from anything ? There is no atmosphere on the moon and cosmic radiation is already there.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I honestly don't know how the moon's physics work but it does appear to be covered in giant fuckin craters. So I was assuming there isn't much to stop something from smashing into the nuclear power plant once constructed and causing potential fallout risks.

[–] vane@lemmy.world 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago)

As far as I remember 99% of costs of nuclear reactor is building this giant concrete around it so radiation don't go out and kill us because we have atmosphere and breath air. Since radiation is everywhere on the moon I don't think we need to care. There is no such thing as nuclear reactor explosion as far as I remember ( this is only media thing) so the core will just melt down and radiate. Still don't know if it will change anything ( I don't think so ).

[–] Corkyskog@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, it's unlikely to hit that spot. They get a crater forming impact every 5 - 10 years. But those big ones you see are like millions of years old. Supposedly there was an impact event in 1178 witnessed by some Monks, but they haven't been able to tie out the crater to it as the one they suspected was later determined to likely be 4 Million years old.

[–] 11111one11111@lemmy.world -4 points 1 day ago

Would you spend trillions of dollars building something that was "unlikely" to result in catastrophic failure? I would prolly want more confidence of its longevity before dumping generations of wealth to build a structure that will cost billions more even to repair minor maintenance to.

[–] Olgratin_Magmatoe@slrpnk.net 14 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just make sure it doesn't turn into another Jamestown situation.

[–] brendansimms@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

maybe this is how we establish Lunar Thanksgiving

[–] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 6 points 1 day ago

🎼We're mutants on the moon...

[–] Yermaw@lemm.ee 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Actually planning to live on the moon. Still didn't get my hoverboard.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 1 points 1 day ago

I guess it's not that different from permanently living in a fallout shelter.