this post was submitted on 02 Jan 2026
342 points (99.1% liked)

World News

51843 readers
2322 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The CIA has assessed Ukraine was not targeting a residence used by Russian President Vladimir Putin in a recent drone attack in the north of his country, according to US officials, undercutting an assertion the Russian leader had made to President Donald Trump in a Monday phone call.

The CIA’s director John Ratcliffe briefed Trump on the assessment Wednesday, the officials said.

Sources said Ratcliffe later briefed Trump that the CIA did not believe it was true. And on Wednesday, Trump appeared to have adopted a more skeptical posture toward posting, posting a link to a New York Post editorial on Truth Social with the headline, “Putin ‘attack’ bluster shows Russia is the one standing in the way of peace.” The Post’s editorial board noted it was “rich that Putin, who has waged a brutal war for nearly four years, believes that any violence in his vicinity merits special outrage” and asserted that “Any attack on Putin is more than justified.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TigerAce@lemmy.dbzer0.com 85 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

So what if they targeted him? He's a war criminal, a legitimate target.

[–] pmk@piefed.ca 48 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It matters if future security guarantees are conditional on Ukraine not attacking Russia. If Russia can claim they were attacked without any fact checking now, they might do the same in the future when it matters more. Showing Russia that their claims are not automatically believed is positioning for the future.

[–] logicbomb@lemmy.world 19 points 1 week ago (2 children)

In countries where the military is aggressively attacking non-combatants in other countries, their war criminal leaders are the most legitimate targets imaginable.

Life isn't exactly like chess, in that in life, it's not always enough to eliminate the king. But, if you keep eliminating king after king until somebody reasonable assumes control, it seems like the least bloody way to end conflict.

[–] dublet@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Stepping on the tail only angers the snake. In order to defeat it, one must strike at the head.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I don't know of any historical precedent where assassinating the leader of a nation-state, and their successors, has actually happened and accomplished anything, unless it was backed by much wider use of force, such as an invasion.

[–] Bwaz@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Fucksake, yes. If there were a fund I could donate to specifically for financing drones to target every place that SOB lies his head, I'd be writing checks to it today.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Soldiers are killed on the battlefield. Kings are ransomed.

[–] rammer@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Should be the other way around. It's the kings who want war. Not the soldiers.

[–] atzanteol@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Oh, absolutely. But that world doesn't exist.

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

War criminals are legitimate targets? Well then...

[–] homes@piefed.world 43 points 1 week ago

Regardless, you can count on Trump to repeat whatever Putin tells him to say.

[–] HazardousBanjo@lemmy.world 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I wouldn't care if Ukraine deployed the fucking Hammer of Dawn onto all of Putin's properties and every Russian government building.

Russia is the aggressor and Putin is a fascist tyrant. The Russian state must be liquidated and Putin should be either executed or sentenced to life by the Hague.

[–] TwinTitans@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

This exactly. Boot up Goldeneye and get them the fuck out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 week ago (2 children)

But what if it was?

Russia would quite happily kill zelenski given any chance and when peace does come, with Putin left in power, I guarantee you that he'll try to assassinate zelenski at the first possible moment

Sorry, but not sorry, Putin is a legitimate target and if killed might end this war (not to mention make the world a little better even)

Let them kill Putin, I only see upsides. This has nothing to do with him being Russian or whatever, this is him being a megalomaniac dictator who loves murdering people all the fucking time. How many people have been assassinated by now in Russia? How many outside Russia? Putin is a fucking menace to anyone, he needs to go

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There have already been several failed assassination attempts against Zelenskyy.

[–] Railcar8095@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

*"It's not the same"

  • most ml bots
[–] AnUnusualRelic@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

I think the issue was that Putin wasn't there at the time. Only his daughter (i think) was, or possibly some other close member of his family.

Apart from that, I agree that Putin is a perfectly valid target, commander in chief and all that.

[–] titanicx@lemmy.zip 19 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I mean honestly doesn't really matter. If you're in a state of war then all military targets are accessible. The leader of the country you're fighting with is certainly a military target. Also Putin's a dumbass and really should fucking die.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] toppy@lemy.lol 18 points 1 week ago

I don't get it. It's war. Ukraine can attack anybody.

[–] DrFistington@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago

No shit. If Ukraine were going to do, they'd still be trying to dig putins corpse out of a pile of rubble

[–] Asfalttikyntaja@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 week ago

Russians are lying? Who would have guessed?

[–] wonderingwanderer@sopuli.xyz 12 points 1 week ago

If only the POTUS would wait to hear from his intelligence officials before making public comments based on the word of an evil, lying, psychopathic dictator...

[–] Duamerthrax@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

And if they were, so what?

[–] tomiant@piefed.social 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The Russians were LYING? I don't know what to say, I really thought higher of them.

[–] Tja@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

Must be the first time they have done such a thing!

[–] manuallybreathing@lemmy.ml 0 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Source: the CIA

lol, reassess your beliefs

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I mean, I think they really should target Putin. I'd love that actually.

[–] Xittstorm@aussie.zone 7 points 1 week ago

It would be entirely acceptable that the country that a war criminal invaded targets said war criminal. But why would the rest of the world listen to the war criminal's lies regardless?

I guess war criminals stick together.

[–] BanMe@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Eh Trump will call the CIA fags and say Putin's far more trustworthy

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

Or have them link it to Venezuela in some way so they can blow up more ports.

[–] stringere@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 week ago

Or have them link it to Venezuela in some way so they can blow up more ports.

[–] Rhoeri@piefed.world 6 points 1 week ago

And who cares if they did?

[–] TheJesusaurus@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Why would it matter that they did?

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 3 points 1 week ago

Be a lot cooler if they did.

[–] Alaik@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 week ago

5 people fired at the CIA in 10.... 9...

[–] phutatorius@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, next story will be Trump firing senior CIA officials in retaliation for undermining Trump's parroting of Putin's lies.

[–] Th3D3k0y@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

My assumption is that since magically every single drone without fail was shot down and they masterfully saved the mansion from this devastating attack is that... Russia sent the drones themselves at the mansion so they could shoot them down and blame Ukraine for attacking "civilian" targets, because Russia would never attack civvies.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

I wish they would

[–] grue@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago
[–] Earthman_Jim@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 week ago

obviously

it makes no strategic sense to attack one of his many fun-houses

[–] chonglibloodsport@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

At this point I’m surprised when Putin is telling the truth. He lies so much it’s just easier to assume he’s lying and wait to see if there’s actually any evidence for what he’s saying.

I predicted that this story about an attack on his residence was a lie. Putin does not want peace. Every time they get closer to an agreement he pulls back. He knows that the peace will lead to him getting Gaddafi’d.

load more comments
view more: next ›