this post was submitted on 08 Jan 2026
-2 points (48.8% liked)

Ye Power Trippin' Bastards

1741 readers
141 users here now

This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.

Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.


Posting Guidelines

All posts should follow this basic structure:

  1. Which mods/admins were being Power Tripping Bastards?
  2. What sanction did they impose (e.g. community ban, instance ban, removed comment)?
  3. Provide a screenshot of the relevant modlog entry (don’t de-obfuscate mod names).
  4. Provide a screenshot and explanation of the cause of the sanction (e.g. the post/comment that was removed, or got you banned).
  5. Explain why you think its unfair and how you would like the situation to be remedied.

Rules


Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.

Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.

YPTB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.


Some acronyms you might see.


Relevant comms

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I post lefty meme and was banned.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rom@hexbear.net 33 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Unfortunately most lemmy "leftists" continue to uncritically believe NATO propaganda about AES countries, which is why you have a bunch of losers in this thread whining about "tankies." If you want an actual, non-anti-communist leftist comm, try .ml, lemmygrad, or hexbear.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 2 months ago

I fully support the OP posting their memes in those instances.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Your great man post (the "history is made by great men" and then the Marx/Engels/Lenin/Stalin/Mao line) doesn't fit the instance and also wasn't a meme and would have been deleted by me anyway, but I wouldn't have banned you for it.

Your other posting was quite good, so imma reverse the community ban; if db0 feels like crashing out over this and banning you instance-wide, I'm sorry, that's outside my control

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Your comm is starting to attract too many red fash who take it as a useful propaganda platform.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 40 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

First of all, I would firmly disagree with calling genuine ML(M)s "red fascists", which is historically disingenuous and, in the present, dangerously inaccurate, especially regarding today's global political climate.

I believe the rules of c/leftymemes are already expansive to prevent irrational idolization/glorification (i.e. exaggerating positive aspects or denying mistakes to the point of lying). However, stating historical fact, or using historical figures to subvert expectations, does not violate that.

Genuinely socialist memes of all stripes (!) have a place there as long as they adhere to the rules, which most do IMO. I admit that moderation could be more proactive and rules better enforced, but we don't get don't get a lot of reports either and currently the largest problem IMHO is the lib infestation in the comments...

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 months ago (6 children)

When the proposed "solution" of the ML(M) would be to place me in a fascist regime with a red coat of paint and oppress me (if not outright murder me in the name of the revolution), I will fucking call them red fash.

or using historical figures to subvert expectations,

There's a fine line between subverting expectations and glorifying authoritarian leaders, and the new crop of posts are hell bent on crossing over it just enough to not get caught.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

When the proposed "solution" of the ML(M) would be to place me in a fascist regime with a red coat of paint and oppress me (if not outright murder me in the name of the revolution)

Just an FYI that this is a massive "[citation needed]" moment, literally no-one advocates for anything like that or even just reimplementing past socialist experiments (which happened under wildly different material conditions), 1:1 today. I believe you are building strawmen...

There's a fine line between subverting expectations and glorifying authoritarian leaders, and the new crop of posts are hell bent on crossing over it just enough to not get caught.

Just showing them as characters in a meme != glorification IMHO (which is what has been happening in the posts that are still up, as far as I can tell).

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

Just an FYI that this is a massive "[citation needed]" moment, literally no-one advocates for anything like tha

How can you say that with a straight face, when there's a whole-ass instance glorifying North Korea?

Not to mention that nobody outright says that they're going to be oppressive. Lenin sounded great in ~~2017~~ 1917 when he was writing effectively anarchist praxis. We just know that the creation of a new state is going to inevitably end up oppressing and killing those who oppose creating a state.

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 24 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Apologies for the wording, I meant that in the "genuine ML(M)" context

Edit:

whole-ass instance glorifying North Korea

Also I don't believe that to be unnuanced uncritical support that wants to blindly copy everything about it either, but largely geopolitical and critical support

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I meant that in the "genuine ML(M)" context

Isn't that a No True Scotsman?

[–] alsaaas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 25 points 2 months ago (18 children)

No? I'm writing from an anti-revisionist, revolutionary Marxist position.

Please also take this into account:

[...] I don’t believe that to be unnuanced uncritical support that wants to blindly copy everything about it either, but largely geopolitical and critical support

load more comments (18 replies)
[–] Pwalabwa@quokk.au 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Lenin sounded great in 2017

Wrong timeline champ. He's still dead in this one 😜

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago

That's what they want you to think!

[–] Quill7513@slrpnk.net 8 points 2 months ago

Dogbert. Your most active user who got instance banned. They do that all the time and you gas them up.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Flatworm7591@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I dunno db0, publicly calling out at Alsaas like this when she had nothing to do with it is out of line imo. It would have been removed by one of the lefty meme mods before long anyway. I see you kind of apologized to her but honestly I'm a bit annoyed on her behalf.

And as Alsaas said, currently the biggest moderation problem is not MLs, who are usually well informed at least, but the brain-dead "reds-under-the-bed" turbolibs in the comments, who've never even heard of Joe McCarthy.

I agree with Alsaas that content removal would have sufficed, so PTB in this case. And no hard feelings I hope.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (18 children)

Two things can be a problem at once. These double standards we have recently where we keep tolerating ml rhetoric in our comms is why hardcore tankies like this person and dogbert and others are emboldened to outright propagandize in our comms. It's why we keep seeing actual anarchists refusing to associate with us out of disgust with how many tankies are here. And when we get straight up propaganda like this from people with a clear anarchist-hating history, we give a slap on the wrist. Enabling further propaganda.

No lib gets anywhere that amount of leeway in here.

load more comments (18 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phdeeznuts@mander.xyz 5 points 2 months ago

Thank you. I will post funny meme only.

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yep, gross instance rules violation. Fuck outa here with the "great men" tankie shite.

[–] phdeeznuts@mander.xyz 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

This great man okay

But ban me?

[–] FelixCress@lemmy.world 11 points 2 months ago (17 children)

First one was funny. But trying to make light of Stalinism and gulags where millions were imprisoned and died, just because USA are terrible about imprisoning people is awful. Shame on you.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Susaga@sh.itjust.works 21 points 2 months ago

Interestingly, you have previously posted here because you were banned for posting pure propaganda to a meme community. And it was, in fact, tankie shite.

[–] Emopunker@feddit.org 6 points 2 months ago

YDI, because you paint monsters and totalitarian regimes in a good light. What's missing is that you try to paint Pol Pot in a good light.

load more comments
view more: next ›