this post was submitted on 09 Jan 2026
28 points (96.7% liked)

World News

51798 readers
3102 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Don't change the original title: Trump's push to acquire Greenland puts Arctic island in focus

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 2 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Yeah, the article itself is actually pretty good.

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 3 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (1 children)

Now that title is the original one, imo I do miss some overview of the like 30ish military bases the US had in Greenland. I find this relevant because the main argument Trump's been forwarding is the need to secure Greenland. This recent article, is a brief history of US military bases in Greenland.

I also found this map:

#Add: This NG article claims that some bases were toxic and needed cleaning up. "In late summer 2019, cleanup work began at the former military base Bluie East Two. On January 11, 2018, Denmark had announced that it would contribute 180 million kroner ($29 million U.S.) over six years to begin cleaning up some of the abandoned military bases on Greenland, though experts warned that the amount was unlikely to be enough to finish the job."

[–] A_norny_mousse@feddit.org 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

overview of the like 30ish military bases the US had in Greenland.

Had, during and right after WW2. The Guardian article you linked quotes a 1952 news report:

At least four major United States air force bases will be built in Greenland in addition to the three already operating there, Danish government sources announced to-day.

The new bases will be hundreds of miles closer to Moscow and the western rim of the Soviet Union than the existing base at Thule. They will lie right across the path which Soviet bombers may be expected to follow in any mission against the chief industrial areas in the eastern United States and around the Great Lakes.


some bases were toxic and needed cleaning up (..) Denmark had announced that it would contribute 180 million kroner ($29 million U.S.) over six years to begin cleaning up some of the abandoned military bases on Greenland, though experts warned that the amount was unlikely to be enough to finish the job.

Why am I not surprised.

[–] HowRu68@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

overview of the like 30ish military bases the US had in Greenland.

It's an example that if security is what they really want, USA could use easily use this format and reopen bases, or build news ones or whatever, within the current Danish-US agreement.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

...instead of focusing on "why tramp wants it" and trying to sanewash and normalize the threats for days on end, why won't journalists focus on "why tramp can't have it"?

[–] jordanlund@lemmy.world 1 points 18 hours ago

We require that headlines match the original, in this case "Trump's push to acquire Greenland puts Arctic island in focus"

Please make it match or we'll have to remove it. You can add additional color in the body or a top level comment.