"Social media is dead, and we killed it."
this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
146 points (95.1% liked)
Technology
69247 readers
3801 users here now
This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
Our Rules
- Follow the lemmy.world rules.
- Only tech related news or articles.
- Be excellent to each other!
- Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
- Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
- Politics threads may be removed.
- No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
- Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
- Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
- Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.
Approved Bots
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"How shall we comfort ourselves, the murderers of all murderers? What was holiest and mightiest of all that the world has yet owned has bled to death under our knives: who will wipe this blood off us? What water is there for us to clean ourselves? What festivals of atonement, what sacred games shall we have to invent? Is not the greatness of this deed too great for us?"
He should know, he fucking killed it
After the android downloads all the data on the Internet, like a dalek.
An opinion from the guy who thinks the metaverse is a viable product? Yeah I'll pass
Mark Zuckerberg Says For-Profit Social Media Is Over
ftfy
Yes, his offerings of "social media" are over. And that's great.
You heard it, the robot said we can go outside again.
Meta displayed a chart showing that the “percent of time spent viewing content posted by ‘friends’ ” has declined in the past two years, from twenty-two per cent to seventeen per cent on Facebook, and from eleven per cent to seven per cent on Instagram.
Yeah. By their design. If they would allow user control over what shows up in their feed, mine would prioritize friends' content. I'm not the one choosing to turn my feed jnto AI slop based on my alleged interest in the topic.
I just scrolled Facebook, and out of the 44 posts I came across 10 were from friends or pages I had liked. The rest was sponsored slop, or "you should follow this person" type posts.
No wonder the social interaction is down, when less than a quarter of posts I come across are from the reason to have Facebook.
I'm not friends with corporations, so don't push me their shit.
Prime Facebook was 2007 - 2011/12. When they started algorithm-ing friends posts, that heralded the end. I don't care that I haven't interacted with friend XYZ for a long while, I'm still interested in seeing their stuff equally as much as friend ABC who I interact with daily
I miss when the Instagram homepage showed all your friends’ new posts before it showed recommended stuff. Now it’s all interwoven
This is exactly why I deleted Facebook and Instagram. It no longer served it’s only purpose.
One of the appeals of Bluesky (for now) is the Followimg feed that presents comments exclusively from people I follow, in chronological order.
Crazy that Facebook can't deliver this anymore
The technical complexity of showing a chronological feed of posts from subscribed accounts? Are you asking for one to scoff at thou peasant? You might as well request a toaster without bluetooth BAHAHAHA! BEGONE!
.order(created_at: :desc)
I don’t have a point, but felt like typing it in Ruby. Maybe someone else will have something snarky to say.
Wooooosh
LMAO trolling used to be a bit more involved than simply omitting the /s...
They can, but choose not to
And these new njmbers have shown that users are choosing not to use facebook.
They used to, but it didn’t boost ad engagement so they stopped.
That's not a can't, it's a get-paid-a-shitload-of-money-to-not.
This. I have to go out of my way to even see my wife's posts (well, before I deleted Facebook).
2/3rds of my feed are ads.
This metric is bullshit because they fucked up the waters.
Try blocking her, the algorithm will prioritize her posts if you do.
Well, I deleted my account so that won't work. But that's crazy if that's true (not doubting you).
I said it as a joke but I suspect it might be true, too. I see a lot of people complaining that they see too many posts of people they block.
This is ironic because all the 40 year old chicks who are career users of FB since college, all cite the same justification for continuing to use it: "But all my photos and the current happenings of my friends".
If you showed them epirical data that only 17% of what they consume on the platform is actually even tangentially related to their friends and family, maybe they'd finally decouple themselves from FB.
And all the photos look like shit because they’ve been recompressed in JPEG, and all the metadata is just gone.
and all the metadata is just gone.
Just recently implemented immich. This hurts real hard.
Right? 'ZOMG users aren't viewing the contents of their friends!', yeah, because you hide that shit behind ads and promoted content, dumb-ass.
Also if I was just looking at friends’ content, it would be empty haha. Couldn’t scroll infinitely.
That's the reason I log into Facebook like once every week or two.
I like to make sure someone didn't die, and I miss the funeral.
you've got a point. they're trying to redefine what "friends" are. and they're succeeding.
He should know, he's the one that put a shotgun in its mouth over a decade ago.
Over?
Give me your profits, then.
Centralized for profit social media should be over.
Washed up trend chaser monopolist wannabe millionaire! Of course your social platforms are over: YOU MADE THEM SHIT!
May I be the first to say..
Social media said Mark Zuckerberg was over and sadly I think neither are right.
hell yeah! rest in hell
but tbh it’s not, old people love it
lol you didn't read the article
damnit you got me, i actually did read it afterwards and realised my comment was wrong but then just left it as it has 9 updoots
Hahaha relatable