this post was submitted on 16 Jan 2026
81 points (94.5% liked)

Technology

78705 readers
3352 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 1 points 5 minutes ago (1 children)

Meta Horizon Worlds is a giant unlicensed and unmoderated daycare.

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 1 points 2 minutes ago (1 children)

So there are people parking their toddlers in a VR world?

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 1 points 52 seconds ago

The overwhelming majority of vr world users are children ages 7-14. There are almost no adults. The adults that are there are trying to interact with kids in an environment where there is zero supervision.

[–] Voroxpete@sh.itjust.works 6 points 35 minutes ago

But what about the zero people who used it? Whatever will they do?

[–] monad@anarchist.nexus 7 points 52 minutes ago* (last edited 51 minutes ago) (1 children)

Great News!

Nobody should use or support anything Meta. As a matter if principle.

[–] clutchtwopointzero@lemmy.world 6 points 37 minutes ago (1 children)

The whole concept was dead on arrival. Second Life never took off and it was perplexing to see that Meta thought it could make it work.

[–] kalleboo@lemmy.world 1 points 2 minutes ago

What happened to Second Life anyway? All the gooners are on VRChat now and they seem to be doing fine

[–] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 2 points 15 minutes ago (1 children)

If a company can dump $100B into failed project and still be profitable they have too much money. Jesus, imagine would would happen if this money went to the workers instead...

[–] JensSpahnpasta@feddit.org 3 points 9 minutes ago

It's actually crazy that you can burn $100B in a project that everybody mocked from the beginnings and still be CEO after that while having earned billions in compensation

[–] Maeve@kbin.earth 9 points 1 hour ago (1 children)
[–] cheese_greater@lemmy.world 1 points 3 minutes ago* (last edited 1 minute ago)

I was struggling to think whatbit was but you just solved that. They want rent, never for you to own anything, much less anything tangible that cant be taken away or revoked or forced to surrender

Appl does the same with music and videos. They want to license it to you and for you to have zero access to the actual files and brainwash entire ongoing new generations to not even understand a file system/owning real files and knowing where to get basically any file you want. The whole notion of a file having tangible value and operable

[–] db0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 2 hours ago

Lol at all the companies who got rugpulled again because they trusted Zuck's promises. Get rekt bozos.

[–] Diplomjodler3@lemmy.world 11 points 2 hours ago

But this time it will be totally different! They'll learn to love our AI slop! Trust me, bro!

[–] Keshara@piefed.world 3 points 2 hours ago

Ugh pay-walled article

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev -2 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Can you explain how it is bad?

[–] ExcessShiv@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 3 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

One more piece of bad news for VR.

OP claims that this particular piece of news is somehow bad.

[–] ambitiousslab@feddit.uk 4 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

It is not OP claiming that. It is the description from the link preview.

[–] Lembot_0006@programming.dev -1 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

I would still like to see an explanation of why it is bad. Regardless of who will provide that explanation :)

[–] zecg@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I would still like to see an explanation of why it is bad. Regardless of who will provide that explanation :)

Because they have Occulus' locked up in their basement and gimmick du jour is worse, now instead of just having a headset where you have to use their account and see ads for their shitty corpo vr chat every time you login you'll have a mandatory llm paperclip learning your habits and shilling 24/7

[–] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (3 children)

Bad for Meta. They wasted a lot of time, money, manpower etc.

Edit: I’m just answering the person’s question. I hate Meta - I don’t have Facebook and I don’t have a Quest.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 2 points 1 hour ago

Also kind of bad for VR that they bought Oculus and buried it under a ton of stuff no one asked for and will likely kill it entirely for failing to be the everyman's gateway to socialization like they strangely imagined it to be.

The true target market for Oculus is relatively niche, but probably could have sustained a more modest oculus. Meta's demands exceed what that market can give them.

Biggest hope for VR future right now is Steam Frame.

[–] brsrklf@jlai.lu 1 points 54 minutes ago

I have a quest. I still hate meta.

My next headset won't be from them, and I can't wait for them to realize they don't give a fuck about VR anymore and abandon it for another fad.

I won't regret their "metaverse" one bit. Killing their game dev studios is an unfortunate collateral, but, again, if it means they go out of that business, GOOD.

[–] skribe@piefed.social 1 points 1 hour ago

They could have bought second life a hundred times over and at least had something that worked (albeit poorly).