this post was submitted on 18 Jan 2026
167 points (97.7% liked)

Not The Onion

19313 readers
1467 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 21 minutes ago

American lobbyists get less influence, sounds good to me

[–] HisArmsOpen@crust.piefed.social 1 points 21 minutes ago

This also empowers more of the Nazi behaviours at home.

[–] feannag@sh.itjust.works 25 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Sooo anyone in Congress going to ask how the executive branch unilaterally withdraws from Senate ratified treaties? No? I guess I shouldn't be surprised.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Actually, whether or not it's permitted is, surprisingly, an undecided point in case law.

The case law here is Goldwater v. Carter, but the Supreme Court ruled on a technicality rather than the major question.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Goldwater_v._Carter

Goldwater v. Carter, 444 U.S. 996 (1979), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court dismissed a lawsuit filed by Senator Barry Goldwater and other members of the United States Congress challenging the right of President Jimmy Carter to unilaterally nullify the Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty, which the United States had signed with the Republic of China, so that relations could instead be established with the People's Republic of China.

EDIT: I've brought it up before because a somewhat-analogous issue was also surprisingly undecided in UK case law, and there was a major legal tussle in the UK over it, whether or not the Prime Minister had the power to withdraw the UK from the EU without going to Parliament.

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 49 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (1 children)

Preventing soldiers from raping folks is contrary to U.S. interests? Jfc.

[–] D_C@sh.itjust.works 26 points 5 hours ago

He does like rape, just ask his ex wife and E Jean Carroll...and many many little kiddies.

[–] devolution@lemmy.world 28 points 5 hours ago

Apparently human trafficking and women's rights is woke too.

[–] AlexLost@lemmy.world 11 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Awesome! Now they only belong to sleepy orgs. It's about time.

[–] jj4211@lemmy.world 7 points 5 hours ago

Given how much they hate being "woke", does that mean "sleepy Joe" was actually a compliment?