Wow, that’s like partway to a general strike, I hope it makes an impression!
this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2026
128 points (100.0% liked)
Progressive Politics
4324 readers
289 users here now
Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)
(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 12 comments
sorted by:
hot
top
controversial
new
old
Do people expect this to make any difference?
Don't get me wrong, we need to take action, and a strike would do it (and be hard on the participants) . But a strike for one day? What would this do?
I'm supportive, but not particularly optimistic about this
[removed by mod]
The money doesn't care till you fuck with the money, and this does in a way that they can't exactly lash out in retaliation.
This is true, but this doesn't fuck with the money. A one-day strike just moves the spending to a different adjacent day. People still need their food and stuff.
Data-wise, this would come up as a tiny blip in an otherwise unchanged pattern of spending. Easily rejected by most analysts as an outlier.
I guess I have more faith in a massive crowd demonstrating than I do in a one-day strike. At least one of them puts on a public spectacle
It's a warning shot fired at the money. If spending on that day drops 80%, it shows the money that the strike threat has teeth. It also puts that population on the street that day, and i would bet AFL-CIO in Minneapolis outnumbers the jackboots on the ground 10:1
Sounds like you enjoy the politics of strongly worded letters then.
It might be a one day strike and then they do it again with an even bigger crowd spanning two days. Then the next time the crowd size doubles and it's a three day strike. Then...
Compared to "Fuck you, I'm not buying my groceries until tomorrow"?
Yeah, the words have more impact than that
Learned about it from this episode of the Team Human podcast
But what is happening in Hong Kong is they come up with a slogan, which is translated as Do Not Split, which is, we know that some people are willing to be confrontational with riot police.
And when they are, that's going to cost the state in terms of not only resources, but it's going to cost the state in terms of political capital and support. And we know that there are some people who are not willing to do that. And we are going to abide by the protocol of Do Not Split, which means that we're not going to criticize them openly, and they're not going to criticize us openly.
If we're the pacifists, we're not going to have them criticize us for being sort of like, I don't know, limpid or flaccid or not courageous or whatever. And we're not going to criticize them for being more confrontational. And the thing is that the support is also tacit.
It's not like they have to come out and tell the media, oh, we approve of our more sort of confrontational colleagues. They just keep quiet. They just keep quiet.
Understanding that a range of tactics is probably going to be necessary. Nobody really knows what's going to work. But if everybody's pushing back against a particularly violent state, then everybody's really on the same side.
I don't think it's inappropriate to discuss how effective a protest will be. If anything, it should inspire more ideas and action.
I already said I support doing something at all, but if you're saying we shouldn't try to make protests more effective, then you have lost me