At a minimum you can't really go on about how an aging population demands more austerity if you aren't in support of something like this.
this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2026
131 points (98.5% liked)
Europe
9307 readers
533 users here now
News and information from Europe 🇪🇺
(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)
Rules (2024-08-30)
- This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
- No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
- Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
- No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
- Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
- If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
- Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
- Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
- No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
- Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.
(This list may get expanded as necessary.)
Posts that link to the following sources will be removed
- on any topic: Al Mayadeen, brusselssignal:eu, citjourno:com, europesays:com, Breitbart, Daily Caller, Fox, GB News, geo-trends:eu, news-pravda:com, OAN, RT, sociable:co, any AI slop sites (when in doubt please look for a credible imprint/about page), change:org (for privacy reasons), archive:is,ph,today (their JS DDoS websites)
- on Middle-East topics: Al Jazeera
- on Hungary: Euronews
Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com
(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)
Ban lengths, etc.
We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.
If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.
If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the primary mod account @EuroMod@feddit.org
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
They are chocking the younger population in taxes, to earn 2000€ a month the company would need to pay about 4000€, and for that the company would need to get at least 5000+€ (to account for taxes for their products and services. And then after that they'd need to make profit if they can).
I'd call that chocking the younger population, specially now that 2000€ would be the bare minimum to live in bigger cities without having to share a place to live. And most people in random cities spend 100€ on electricity, 500-700 on renting, 250 for food per person, expensive gas prices, etc.
If they won't lower the taxes, no matter how many immigrants they bring, the younger population cant save up, build infrastructure and companies, or anything for the matter, so the country won't prosper.
We’re an irregular immigrant unable to return to our original country safely and our student visa ran out sadly. Very happy this is being passed. So many homeless people around just wanting to work along with us. We’ve been working under the table and have been wanting to pay taxes and contribute. Can’t believe we’re saying this but can’t wait to work again especially in a country that cares about its people.
I'd love if this worked to bring more revenue, but there's no room for unskilled labor in Spain with the current (high) unemployment rate. This regulatory change acts like a call to even more immigrants to come in. And as in all of history, the higher the unemployment, the easiest it is for employers to exploit workers
Also, unskilled immigration specially from African countries is overall a net loss for the country, tax wise. I'd love if it wasn't like this, but a government can't claim to be socialist while flooding an already flooded work market and housing market with half a million immigrants just like that.
Again, I'm the first that'd be happy if this was even remotely useful to increase our quality of life, but it just isn't, it puts more stressed on a country that's hanging on a very thin edge.
Spain’s independent fiscal authority (AIReF) estimates that in 2017 non‑European immigrants had a positive net annual fiscal contribution of about €4,200, mainly because they’re younger and draw fewer pensions in the short run.
Also, the ‘half a million’ you mention is being discussed as a régularisation, not necessarily 500k new arrivals overnight.
Finally, if you have a source that shows ‘unskilled African immigration is a net tax loss in Spain’ (with definitions and data), share it...
This? from 2006? I'd consider this very much a different kind of immigration to the one we have now, It was two decades ago
also feel free to check what I answered in the comments to another user justifying my initial comment with sources and such
Also, unskilled immigration specially from African countries is overall a net loss for the country, tax wise. I'd love if it wasn't like this, but a government can't claim to be socialist while flooding an already flooded work market and housing market with half a million immigrants just like that.
Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence
Before I give you mixed spanish sources, this is one of the best european made analysis on the topic of Immigration net revenue or loss by country (from the netherlands)
https://docs.iza.org/dp17569.pdf
Now these are spanish sources:
- https://www.elmundo.es/espana/2025/09/28/68d7ff8221efa0370d8b4589.html If you scroll down you can see graphs on "max education level reached" by immigration groups vs locals,
for example, africans in this graph only reach superior education or university 10% of the times, where locals are at 48.9% and latin american immigration at 31.5%, europeans at 28,8%, asians at 26%, and so on
Now, regarding work, just bellow that table on the same source, we can see the "activity rate" (so people that are either working or doing something towards it), locals 87%, average sits around 83%, africans are at 69%. For ocupation (which means they are actively working) 51%, while immigration from asia, europe, and locals sit above 70% points at all times, locals are at 80%.
For a final unemployment rate statistic of 8% for locals, 16% for second generation immigrants, and 25% for current generation immigrants (from africa)
(source: 4ºtrimester 2024 INE (national institute of statistics of spain))
You also have this study specifically on net tax win/loss, with sources at the bottom of it
https://fundaciondisenso.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/09/20250024_InformeXXIX-1.pdf
And again, I don't have any problems with immigration, but studies exist from a reason, and they are clear as water, I'd love for every person to have a chance to educate themselves, have a good job, start their life and so on. But that can't be at the expense of the people already at the country they are moving to.
Hi. Thanks for bringing the data. I found this source that talks about low skilled immigrants impact reanalysed in US but might extrapolate to other cases. Suggests that they are actually a net positive but of course it is debatable. That said, it is quite sad that nationalism and individualism became so standard around the west. Africa and Latin America have historically been the backyard to do what the imperial west pleases for ages. A bit of solidarity does not hurt, and the impact on quality of life that this has for immigrants is never considered in the total positive, just "the economy". We're worse off bc of super rich parasites. Let's stop this reverse robin hood.
I bring the data saying some countries bring immigrants who represent a net loss
Then you say the study you read "suggests" the opposite is true.
And while I repeatedly said first gen immigrants (from years and years ago), have way better statistics, not discriminating them by their race,, you still point me out as using this data to discriminate. I specially pointed out latin americans have integrated really well in the country, getting almost to the same stats as locals, which is awesome, and I think immigration is good if that people integrate and assimilate, otherwise it just isn't working man. Doesn't have anything to do with nationalism individualism or anythingism, just logic and being fair.