this post was submitted on 09 Feb 2026
654 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

81026 readers
4458 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Damage@feddit.it 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

lol, 3d printing enthusiasts try to solve everything with 3d printing.

source: I have 3 3d printers

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 6 points 21 hours ago

Printing isn't enough, but it's a piece of what needs to happen.

[–] Sp00kyB00k@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

I also love the part when people are glittering ICE. Whistling and Glitter those bastards.

[–] Cantaloupe877@lemmy.world 48 points 2 days ago (7 children)

Has anyone heard of “3D GUN’T” software that’s apparently being put into new 3d printers? It can apparently block prints based off the shape or whatever to prevent the printing of gun parts, and keeps tabs on who printed exactly what. It’s basically DRM for 3d printers. Also laws in certain states demanding printers be legally required to start blocking gun parts. It may be the beginning of something worse as it adds the infrastructure needed to further block “bad shapes” down the road.

https://3dprint.com/314218/daring-am-software-advances-aim-to-curb-illegal-3d-printing-of-firearms/ https://printandgo.tech/blog/3d-gunt-solution-to-prevent-3d-printed-ghost-guns

[–] ramenshaman@lemmy.world 2 points 12 hours ago

IIRC that's only potentially going to be a law in Washington state (for now). It's not really enforceable. It's a law made by people who don't know what they're talking about. My printers and my slicers are blocked from communicating outside my local network. Once shape-blocking firmware gets pushed people will just revert back to the previous firmware version.

[–] rob_t_firefly@lemmy.world 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Whatever people in power try to stir up about this, it's literally impossible to legislate and block shapes from being 3D-printed. Any attempts to do so are a fool's errand, and/or just being used to justify misguided (and doomed) attempts to lock down 3DP technology for other reasons (read DRM/copyright forces in big business.) Blocking parts that might be for a gun from being printed simply cannot be done.

https://blog.adafruit.com/2026/02/04/what-a-load-of-filament-the-case-against-3d-printer-gun-detection/

https://michaelweinberg.org/blog/2026/02/04/3d-printer-gun-screen/

[–] jim3692@discuss.online 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

If I understand correctly, this affects 3d printers that can read STL. What if someone, hypothetically, uses an open source slicer, like Orca, and print from gcode?

[–] abs_mess@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Good luck adding drm to a microwave to prevent it from microwaving "fish and fish adjacent shapes". 3d printers consist of a couple of motors and a hot bit. No computer in there, unless you go for the high end stuff and even then they can't run that sort of software. MCUs are clocked in MHz, but even a 10 year old computer is clocked in GHz. Even with a cloud connections, how much money have companies poured into "AI" only to have it still get things wrong? Do lawmakers expect a podunk garage team to figure out what Google, Meta, Apple, and literal billions of R&D haven't?

Since this is effectively a ban, it would result in "healthcare CEO shot by wooden ghost gun" if gun kits are still sold, because 3d printers don't print guns. They print the "lower" that has the serial number, which is legally, but not practically, defined to be the "gun". Any gun that doesn't have a serial is a ghost gun, but the point is moot.

More realistically, it would result in: "healthcare CEO shot by a 2026 special edition 9mm VEHHFU746582 on sale for 1984$, get it before it is banned" because for some reason the legislature is running on rich people feelings, and this shooting is special because of the gun, and not because of EVERYTHING ELSE.

Not super into guns but I'm a bit frustrated with the technical ineptitude of some of these lawmakers. Gun control existed before 3d printers did, this is just half assed. Feel free to correct me if I missed something.

[–] bilb@lemmy.ml 1 points 16 hours ago

You're right, 3D printers and filaments simply need to be made illegal to own and use without a license, like a still. People should be buying from corporations anyway, not designing and printing things at home. Who do we think we are?

[–] silence7@slrpnk.net 2 points 21 hours ago

What happened is that the skill requied to manufacture a lower receiver out of metal dropped quite sharply, enabling a large number of people to make weapons without serial numbers

[–] markovs_gun@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

If nothing else I feel like more people would be killed with Shinzo Abe guns and similar hardware store contraptions

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ThePantser@sh.itjust.works 183 points 2 days ago (23 children)

Been printing them, just need some good locations to place my boxes

load more comments (23 replies)
[–] knobbysideup@sh.itjust.works 100 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (12 children)

They are armed. You should be too. And wear protective gear. They've permanently blinded people on purpose. They've already executed people in the street. Notice they aren't near anyplace where bpp is active.

An alarm won't stop a break in, and a whistle won't stop these goons from harming you.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 110 points 2 days ago (1 children)

a whistle won't stop these goons from harming you.

No it will not, but it will alert everyone around you to ICEs presence so they can have an opportunity to be somewhat prepared.

You'll at least give your neighbours a chance to put some pants on, hide, barricade, or even arm themselves; before ICE tries to kick in their door.

It also calls others to your aid; quickly forming mob that out numbers ICE, forcing them to focus on crowd control instead of targeted kidnapping.

[–] ReluctantMuskrat@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

And when lots of people are around, you have lots of cameras. Imagine how different things would be if we didn't have video from Minnesota.

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] AnarchistArtificer@slrpnk.net 28 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Thanks for sharing this. This bolstered my spirit.

I liked the bit where it discusses how, regardless of the effectiveness of whistles in deterring ICE, they have proven to be helpful in regular people feeling less alone.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›