This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.
It's subservience, not fear on CBS's part.
Good on Colbert for bringing a little Streisand effect to the party.
This stunt has caused the video to get 100 times the views it would normally get. I watched it and i never catch the colbert report unless i stumble across is online.
The Trump administration is doing their best to destroy this country, but even republicans know you don't touch the first amendment.
Brilliant bit of marketing to blare "We've been censored by the FCC!" from the rooftops, on the day the Texas primary starts.
It's the Orson Wells playbook. "See the movie that the Hersts dont want you to see!!"
Still brilliant either way.
You can still (and should) watch it on YouTube!
Rep. James Talarico On Confronting Christian Nationalism, And Strange Days In The Texas Legislature
Edit: If you feel so inclined, you can donate to his US Senate campaign here: https://secure.actblue.com/donate/jt-tx-web
If the link goes dark I've pulled copy, hit me up.
That guy was super well spoken and had a good message. I'm surprised I hadn't heard of him before. Always nice to see the Streisand Effect in action!
He was definitely well spoken and definitely had a good message. It's not at all surprising that we haven't heard of him.
The joy of his Colbert Report is finally returning to him.
Remember, CBS is now owned by a Trump ally.
Correct, they refused to air it not out of fear of the FCC, but out of fear of that Texans might like what Talarico has to say.
Banning something is a sure fire way to give it oxygen. Streisand effect
The problem Trump has in doing this type of suppression is that it gains more attention and riles people up more than if he had let the interview air. Sure the interview might have said things he didn't want to be said, but now he has made this a much bigger issue and he looks weak because he is scared at the mere prospect of some words being uttered.
Banning something is a sure fire way to give it oxygen.
Depends. Stephen says he was told not to tell anyone on air that they couldn't air it. Assuming that's true, and he had decided to comply, no one really would have known. It's only through his (presumed) bravery that we've all seen it.
I'm sure there would have been articles asking why there was an interview uploaded to the YouTube channel and pinned right at the top that wasn't aired on the channel. It wouldn't have been under the radar either way, but it would have taken longer to be reported this widely.
But I do get your point.
Well not taking anything from him, but with so many people involved in a TV production I think it would have come out in some form that dissent was being suppressed.
Yep, and Colbert has no reason to pull any punches either. They already canceled his show to appease the administration. Why would Stephen hesitate to tell the world every time CBS bends the knee?
Good on him for calling out every time they act as state propaganda and not a news network.
If they cancel the show earlier they can't pretend to be impartial, and Colbert gets paid the rest of his contract without having to do any work.
Plus they'll be in the real news for a week lol
i wouldn't have watched the interview if cbs hadn't cancelled it
Same
And, in hindsight, I'm glad I did. That guy has the right idea.
He said 'It's not left vs right, it's top vs bottom'.
Exactly what we need our politicians to be acknowledging
No wonder the Trump regime didn't want it aired. Nothing is more dangerous to them than pointing out that the culture war is fabricated to distract from the class war so the poors don't realize that the billionaires are their enemies, not immigrants and trans people.
Yeah, the guy seems like a Christian that follows the bible (I've since watched other Interviews) and wants to practice the 'love thy neighbor' part and not the 'hate the gays and abortion' part (which, as he points out, do not exist).
That's a good kind of person to run in Texas, Jesus was a socialist after all...
Banning something is a sure fire way to give it oxygen.
It's a clever bit of marketing to queue this up and make a big stir and drum about being censored.
The allegations feel... thin? This is a primary race in a state that's been sandbagged for Republicans for decades. But as a piece of campaign material, it's par excellance. More people are going to see the clip passed around online than ever would watching it broadcast on a Monday night.
The problem Trump has in doing this type of suppression
I doubt this was anyone's serious intent. Republicans pull this gag all the time. They deliberately try and trick the alarm for censorship and then scream ten times as loud "LOOK AT ME! I'VE BEEN CENSORED! CHECK OUT THE VIDEO THEY DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE!"
Liberals (or, at least, this one guy fighting for his life in a deep red state) finally seem to have caught up to the game.
Not to say this story isn’t important, self censorship at the hands of the state is…
But what does this have to do with technology?
Important story, wrong place friend.
Exactly. Post it to a Programming forum because... you know, computers and stuff.
I believe that communications/media broadcasting are under the technology umbrella.
Not really a tech centric story. This is primarily a political/free speech story. If it was about a piece of technology used to censor someone, that might fit.
I didn't even notice, good catch.
See BS is not scared of the FCC, they're bootlicking. But I'm sure Colbert is trying to be diplomatic.
