this post was submitted on 17 Feb 2026
521 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

81374 readers
5409 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Hacker News.

Late-night host Stephen Colbert accused his network, CBS, of refusing to broadcast his interview with Texas Rep. James Talarico, a Democratic candidate for U.S. Senate, during Monday night’s airing of “The Late Show” for fear of running afoul of the Trump administration.

Colbert said CBS canceled Talarico’s appearance on air in light of guidance issued Jan. 21 by Federal Communications Commission Chairman Brendan Carr, which directed daytime and late-night TV talk show hosts to offer equal airtime to all political candidates running for a given office. Talk shows have long been exempted from these “equal time” rules when conducting “bona fide news interviews,” allowing them to book political candidates without bringing on their opponents.

Talarico “was supposed to be here, but we were told in no uncertain terms by our network’s lawyers, who called us directly, that we could not have him on the broadcast,” Colbert said in a segment explaining the cancelation. “Then I was told in some uncertain terms that not only could I not have him on, I could not mention me not having him on. And because my network clearly doesn’t want us to talk about this, let’s talk about this.”

The interview was set to air on Monday night’s show the day before the start of early voting for Texas’ March 3 primaries. Talarico is vying for the Senate Democratic nomination against U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Dallas.

top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] chillpanzee@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

It's subservience, not fear on CBS's part.

Good on Colbert for bringing a little Streisand effect to the party.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 2 points 3 minutes ago

Subservience to the FCC and the administration is the excuse. The real reason is that David Ellison is afraid the dem might win.

The majority owner of CBS is Paramount Global, which itself is controlled by Skydance Media, a company led by David Ellison (son of Larry Ellison), following a significant acquisition of the Redstone family's stake in mid-2025.

[–] FreeLikeGNU@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

Talarico is vying for the Senate Democratic nomination against U.S. Rep. Jasmine Crockett of Dallas.

Interesting. Crockett is one of the very few Dems willing if not just able to navigate through Republican tactics. What could Talarico offer?

[–] LoafedBurrito@lemmy.world 25 points 2 hours ago

This stunt has caused the video to get 100 times the views it would normally get. I watched it and i never catch the colbert report unless i stumble across is online.

The Trump administration is doing their best to destroy this country, but even republicans know you don't touch the first amendment.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 23 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Brilliant bit of marketing to blare "We've been censored by the FCC!" from the rooftops, on the day the Texas primary starts.

[–] bagsy@lemmy.world 13 points 2 hours ago

It's the Orson Wells playbook. "See the movie that the Hersts dont want you to see!!"

Still brilliant either way.

[–] protist@mander.xyz 110 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

You can still (and should) watch it on YouTube!

Rep. James Talarico On Confronting Christian Nationalism, And Strange Days In The Texas Legislature

Edit: If you feel so inclined, you can donate to his US Senate campaign here: https://secure.actblue.com/donate/jt-tx-web

[–] Reygle@lemmy.world 18 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

If the link goes dark I've pulled copy, hit me up.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

Thank you. I was just thinking that someone needs to grab this, and it was going to be a pita if I had to be the one to do it.

(More copies are always welcome.)

[–] jballs@sh.itjust.works 30 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

That guy was super well spoken and had a good message. I'm surprised I hadn't heard of him before. Always nice to see the Streisand Effect in action!

[–] mPony@kbin.earth 9 points 1 hour ago

He was definitely well spoken and definitely had a good message. It's not at all surprising that we haven't heard of him.

[–] qualia@lemmy.world 13 points 3 hours ago

The joy of his Colbert Report is finally returning to him.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 152 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Remember, CBS is now owned by a Trump ally.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 96 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (2 children)

Correct, they refused to air it not out of fear of the FCC, but out of fear of that Texans might like what Talarico has to say.

[–] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 6 points 31 minutes ago

Texas flips blue is on my Bingo card.

[–] Serinus@lemmy.world 1 points 9 minutes ago

And it's a hell of a brave thing Colbert and crew are doing in speaking out.

They're patriots at a time when speech isn't free.

[–] frazw@lemmy.world 66 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

Banning something is a sure fire way to give it oxygen. Streisand effect

The problem Trump has in doing this type of suppression is that it gains more attention and riles people up more than if he had let the interview air. Sure the interview might have said things he didn't want to be said, but now he has made this a much bigger issue and he looks weak because he is scared at the mere prospect of some words being uttered.

[–] Ulrich@feddit.org 7 points 2 hours ago (2 children)

Banning something is a sure fire way to give it oxygen.

Depends. Stephen says he was told not to tell anyone on air that they couldn't air it. Assuming that's true, and he had decided to comply, no one really would have known. It's only through his (presumed) bravery that we've all seen it.

[–] halcyoncmdr@piefed.social 3 points 2 hours ago

I'm sure there would have been articles asking why there was an interview uploaded to the YouTube channel and pinned right at the top that wasn't aired on the channel. It wouldn't have been under the radar either way, but it would have taken longer to be reported this widely.

But I do get your point.

[–] frazw@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

Well not taking anything from him, but with so many people involved in a TV production I think it would have come out in some form that dissent was being suppressed.

[–] BreadstickNinja@lemmy.world 33 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Yep, and Colbert has no reason to pull any punches either. They already canceled his show to appease the administration. Why would Stephen hesitate to tell the world every time CBS bends the knee?

Good on him for calling out every time they act as state propaganda and not a news network.

[–] Darkcoffee@sh.itjust.works 13 points 4 hours ago

If they cancel the show earlier they can't pretend to be impartial, and Colbert gets paid the rest of his contract without having to do any work.

Plus they'll be in the real news for a week lol

[–] furzegulo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 44 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

i wouldn't have watched the interview if cbs hadn't cancelled it

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 34 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Same

And, in hindsight, I'm glad I did. That guy has the right idea.

He said 'It's not left vs right, it's top vs bottom'.

Exactly what we need our politicians to be acknowledging

[–] samus12345@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No wonder the Trump regime didn't want it aired. Nothing is more dangerous to them than pointing out that the culture war is fabricated to distract from the class war so the poors don't realize that the billionaires are their enemies, not immigrants and trans people.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 8 points 1 hour ago

Yeah, the guy seems like a Christian that follows the bible (I've since watched other Interviews) and wants to practice the 'love thy neighbor' part and not the 'hate the gays and abortion' part (which, as he points out, do not exist).

That's a good kind of person to run in Texas, Jesus was a socialist after all...

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 15 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 4 hours ago) (3 children)

Not to say this story isn’t important, self censorship at the hands of the state is…

But what does this have to do with technology?

Important story, wrong place friend.

[–] AMillionMonkeys@lemmy.world 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

Exactly. Post it to a Programming forum because... you know, computers and stuff.

[–] panda_abyss@lemmy.ca 1 points 54 minutes ago

History memes too!

[–] Beep@lemmus.org 33 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

I believe that communications/media broadcasting are under the technology umbrella.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Not really a tech centric story. This is primarily a political/free speech story. If it was about a piece of technology used to censor someone, that might fit.

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 8 points 4 hours ago

I didn't even notice, good catch.

[–] inclementimmigrant@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

See BS is not scared of the FCC, they're bootlicking. But I'm sure Colbert is trying to be diplomatic.