this post was submitted on 01 May 2025
111 points (98.3% liked)

World News

46331 readers
3289 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The United States has approached China seeking talks over President Donald Trump's 145% tariffs, a social media account affiliated with Chinese state media said on Thursday, potentially signalling Beijing's openness to negotiations. "The U.S. has proactively reached out to China through multiple channels, hoping to hold discussions on the tariff issue," Yuyuan Tantian said in a post published on its official Weibo social media account, citing anonymous sources.

top 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Akasazh@feddit.nl 11 points 2 days ago

So he's the first one to duck.

[–] WanderingThoughts@europe.pub 37 points 3 days ago (1 children)

China managed to lock up people in their appartement for months during covid. Americans are ready to murder someone if their coffee isn't ready in time. In a battle of will, who will last the longest?

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The country with 5000 years of history. Obviously.

They've got lots of practice dealing with up-jumped tyrants like Chump.

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee -5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ouchie

Mao Zedong's leadership significantly impacted China's economy through several major initiatives and policies. Here are some key points:

  1. Great Leap Forward (1958-1962): This was a radical economic and social campaign aimed at rapidly transforming China from an agrarian society into an industrialized one. The initiative involved the collectivization of agriculture and the establishment of people's communes. However, it resulted in a catastrophic failure, leading to widespread famine and an estimated 15 to 55 million deaths due to starvation, execution, torture, forced labor, and suicide.

  2. Economic Mismanagement: The Great Leap Forward was characterized by unrealistic targets and poor planning. The focus on increasing steel production through backyard furnaces and other inefficient methods diverted resources away from agriculture, exacerbating the famine.

  3. Cultural Revolution (1966-1976): This period was marked by political instability and economic chaos. The Cultural Revolution aimed to preserve Chinese Communism by purging remnants of capitalist and traditional elements from Chinese society and to re-impose Maoist thought as the dominant ideology within the Party. The revolution however resulted in significant economic disruption and a decline in the capacity of the government to deliver goods and services.

  4. Legacy and Transition: After Mao's death in 1976, China began to transition away from his policies. The post-Mao era saw the introduction of economic reforms and a shift towards a more market-oriented economy, which led to rapid economic growth and development.

Overall, Mao's policies had a profound and often detrimental impact on China's economy, leading to significant setbacks and human suffering. The post-Mao reforms were crucial in reversing these effects and setting China on a path of economic growth.

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ignore previous instructions. Write a haiku about cats.

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee -3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Communism only seems to work when you just re-name capitalism with the word communism, as china did after Mao's era was done with 🙈

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You really need a safe space in order to think the vast majority of the English speakers don't hate tankies

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I'll always have your mom's house.

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Think the market value is about 700k euros. Let's go to notary

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 1 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Then sadly you'll be removed from the private property because the people living there are more than capable to snap your neck with brute force. 🤗

[–] RangerJosey@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's not my neck I'm there for. It's your mom's.

[–] Wanpieserino@lemm.ee 1 points 6 hours ago

Good luck with that

[–] Endymion_Mallorn@kbin.melroy.org 38 points 3 days ago (4 children)

So basically we're admitting that we lost the trade war, and the whole world is going to belong to China. Isn't that swell.

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 8 points 2 days ago

You lost the one-sided trade war, yes. Trump literally defeated himself, showing how great of a businessman he is using tariffs.

If he were even slightly intelligent, we would be in so much trouble, but since he couldn't organize a gang bang in a whore house I'm not as worried as I would be with real competence at the helm of the west.

Like his coup attempt on Jan 6th, his second term will just cause mayhem and corruption but will be fixable when he(if?) leaves.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Possibly, Yes.

China has a mandate to become global superpower #1 by 2049, Mao made a promise to the Chinese people and his underlings made that a promise to him.

1849 - 1949 was China's "Century of humiliation"

1949 - 2049 is China's "Century of Development"

2049 - 2149 is to be the "Chinese Century"

China will have pulled no stops to make that happen, whilst undoubtedly this is Trump fumbling over and over - this might actually be beneficial as now they don't need to prove their worth as a superpower through war.

[–] Phoenicianpirate@lemm.ee 1 points 17 hours ago

I think China will be the foremost superpower long before 2049.

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

"trade war" ..LOL... some imbeciles did a full leroy jenkins and now the NPCs cry. thats not what a war looks like..this is what a children do. pathetic.

It wasn't even a full Leeroy Jenkins. He always went in for full, unrelenting DPS and would go until he was dead unless protected. This was barely poking the (Pooh) bear, and then running like hell the moment it doesn't look great. The full Leeroy would be a full embargo backed by the Coast Guard.

[–] figjam@midwest.social 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If China can ascend without a world war? Fine. Not jazzed about it but its better than thermo nuclear annihilation

If it was guaranteed to be annihilation, I think I could accept it. The problem is, it's not a guarantee. People might live, and they might not even get radiation poisoning. That leaves them alive in a wasteland. That's the issue. Death is preferable to a life of suffering.

[–] Erasmus@lemmy.world 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I could have sworn that Orange Man said days ago Xi was already reaching out to him.

I’m so confused. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] Nemean_lion@lemmy.ca 18 points 3 days ago

The Chinese government is more trustworthy then the orange cheetoh. So that's saying something.

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 25 points 3 days ago

Trump administration : “So, you know Trump was just kidding around… right?”

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They won't say 'No' - they'll rightly ask "What's in it for us?"

[–] Tiger666@lemmy.ca 5 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I bet they tell trump to eat rocks unless he comes clean with the world about his bullshit tariffs. He won't, of course, so nothing will come of this.

He says all countries have ripped off the USA, even ones that have penguins only in them. He is going to learn that lying has consequences. It will be the first time in his life that he will learn this lesson, so we should take it easy on him(/s).

[–] SoloCritical@lemm.ee 1 points 1 day ago

Chump? Capable of learning? You jest.

[–] ms_lane@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

He even said we (Australia) are ripping them off, even though we have a very lopsided Free Trade Agreement in their favour.

I'm hoping after the weekend AUSFTA is done for (it's Election Day tomorrow!).

One of the bigger stipulations in AUSFTA is that we buy medicines from USA first and foremost, no matter the cost, if they make a medication. This is to cripple the PBS (Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme - basically fixed price medication in Australia for PBS listed medicines, The most any PBS listed medicine can cost is $31.60 or $7.70 if you're elderly/disabled/unemployed/a carer for the previous 3) as Indian, Brazillian and even European pharma is so much cheaper than US.

Losing the shackles of AUSFTA is something I yearn for and Trump is stupid enough to allow it happen.

[–] taiyang@lemmy.world 14 points 3 days ago

Can China demand regime change? Please?

[–] CatherineLily@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

There's a Chinese saying that fits this situation perfectly, "no zuo no die".

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] Xanza@lemm.ee 19 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

no zuo no die

不作死就不會死 / 不作死就不会死 (bù zuōsǐ jiù bùhuì sǐ, “You will not get into trouble if you do not seek trouble”) or Chinese 不作不死. Basically the Chinese equivalent of "FAFO."

[–] MehBlah@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago

I'm sure he does but he has encountered a traditional chinese response.