this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
2 points (100.0% liked)

News

29146 readers
3951 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

What people in the US also need to realize is, that the rest of the world still enjoys more or less unchanged prices on these sites. It is only the US that has put tarrifs on them and it has only affected the American consumers

On the other hand, American products are getting more expensive everywhere else, because of the retaliational tarrifs by the usa.

So it is a double edged sword, but the US is holding it by it's blade! With both hands!

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy@feddit.uk -1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Until sellers start jacking prices up elsewhere in the world to make up for lost revenue from the American market

[–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 1 points 3 days ago

A Lemmy post about an article about a Reddit post. The internet feels more and more incestuous every day.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] easily3667@lemmus.org 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Wait there's a racist version of Pikachu?

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

what electrocuting Pokemon of other races until they submit isn’t racist enough for you?

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (4 children)

Americans are dumb as fuck

[–] Sunflier@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think you're misconstruing hate with stupidity. Many are more hateful than dumb.

[–] RedditIsDeddit@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

hate and stupidity go hand in hand

[–] BreadAndThread@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

We don't have that on lock, dipshit. Look around you, the entire world is fucking up royally. We just happen to be one of the biggest shitshows going.

The fact that you treat Americans like a monolith shows that you're dumb as fuck too.

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah, I dunno broseph. Lots of other first world countries have things like universal healthcare, paternity leave, significant and mandatory vacation, longer lifespans, generally higher quality of life and happiness, politics that aren't straight up clown shows, more human rights.

You've successfully nailed an obvious generalization that there are stupid people everywhere, but the point is that stupidity is hyper-concentrated in the good ol' US of A. As is evident.

[–] BreadAndThread@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

No one was arguing that, stay on point. I KNOW and most democrats do about the fucking shitshow that is our government's treatment of its people.

I'm devastated by my country and will die in feeling. So again, you're an obvious idiot as well.

Also, bro, women exist online. I know, shocker.

[–] Gluca23@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Just accept it. We have free healthcare for 50 years.

[–] BreadAndThread@lemmy.world 1 points 12 hours ago

Who TF is talking g about Healthcare? I love how so many people keep hitting that. MOST OF US KNOW YOU STUPID TWAT. However, millions and millions of us donating money, fighting, and marching can't fight against the RICHEST MAN ON THE PLANET.

He's coming for your country too. Can't wait.

[–] _cryptagion@lemmy.dbzer0.com -1 points 2 days ago

oh boy, you really showed them!

[–] TheFeatureCreature@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

This is by design. Decades of eroding education and critical thinking have produced a populace that is highly ignorant and extremely easy to manipulate.

There is a reason why attacking education is the first thing any right-wing government does.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Doesn't help that a whole lot of idiots also think it's somehow very clever of them to "rise above" it all by acting like it's "both sides". This is what passes (for a special kind of smug idiot) for political acumen.

Of course, the "liberal media" harps on the "both sides" thing all the freaking time. Which is why I find it mighty curious that a lot of supposed "leftists" take up that mantra, too.

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

*Rightists.

Right wingers are the only people I hear the "both sides" mantra from. I don't know what media you're consuming, but you got it ass backwards.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The bullshit "liberal media" does the "both sides" thing all the freaking time.

And I'm talking about an awful lot of supposed leftists on places like Lemmy that do things like "but Biden's economy was actually BAD!" and so on. I could go on for other examples....now, whether I believe most of them are actual leftists, I dunno...

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

That example is not leftists, no matter what they claim. It's like a lot of "Independent" voters are just too embarrassed to own up to what they really are. "Leftists" or what we call Dems, are more likely to accept their L's and don't harbor proven criminals. No Dem was crying when Senator Mendenez was caught, and most believe he deserves whatever punishment he has earned. If they spout republican talking points, and whine like little children, claim their losses were "stolen", etc then they're rightists.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone -1 points 2 days ago

You must be new to lemmy

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Amongst wealthy countries, the US scores above average in science and reading comprehension, and are only really showing lag in mathematics. In terms of critical thinking, this has been a baked-in element of the curriculum, that was intentionally baked-in, for a long time now. Most countries are this way, and those that have dedicated time to specifically critical thinking, as its own subject, are relatively new, and not many do it, in primary education, yet. So this means the US is not unique in how poorly students are taught critical thinking, amongst countries with similar levels of resources.

Also, baby boomers demonstrated a lower level of critical thinking skills, than kids do today, they also show sharper cognitive decline, earlier in life, than X, and millennials have been. So is it that the conservatives have been trying to disassemble the public school system, to move funds to privatized education, thus eroding the common access to education? If so, why does the US actually score well compared to its peers? Why is it that the oldest common generation is actually the worst of the common generations, still alive, for things like critical thinking, and cognitive decline?

So there is some other factor(s) that make the US seem to stand out on this issue, amongst peers. Could it be US media specifically empowering the voice of morons, because outrage drives viewership, and profit is the only goal to US news/media companies? Is it that the elites within the conservative party have redesigned their entire party structure, and playbook, to empower morons, because morons vote for them more often than not? Is it a combination of these factors, and others, that have been shaping the US in this fashion? Could this be why we have been seeing greater, and greater, pushes from political influence groups, in other countries, that have ties to US wealth? Things like dismantling the NHS, establishing US style media as the dominant party in places like europe (murdoch family owned outlets getting larger pieces of the pie, and pushing sentiment to dismantle not for profit sources, like the BBC, and NPR/PBS, for example), far right parties, trump cocksuckers, putin cocksuckers, etc. have been on the rise for past ten plus years? Could it also be that people are growing increasingly disaffected with capitalism, and there are a lot of people lashing out, lacking understanding of what is causing life to be more difficult, and reaching out, in desperation, to anyone who sounds different from those who got us here, even if it should be obvious those people would likely make these specific issues worse? Is it that these things are also compounded with a growing desire, amongst the growing disproportionately wealthy set, to push all the bad aspects of societal structure, to hasten its collapse, and then swoop in to take over directly?

IMHO it is all of the factors in the previous paragraph, and others I haven't bothered to bring up, and not so much the education system, at least not yet. Sorry for the word vomiting in this post.

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You missed lead poisoning. I believe that's epidemic in America....

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes the lead is one of the many issues i didn't get into, it is on the decline though. However, microplastics is the new lead. We know it affects the endocrine system, as of yet, though, we do not know how, or what the effects will be. Point being, blaming this behavior on education isn't shooting at the right target, and there are so many targets.

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but microplastics is a world wide issue. Lead, not so much. And here, we were discussing why America, in particular, is so goddam stupid.

[–] Jiggle_Physics@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think these factors are specifically unique to the US, some more than other. I think a lot of the environmental stuff you can see in many places, lead is not just a problem in the US, we are just more talkative about it.

https://www.cgdev.org/publication/combatting-hidden-epidemic-lead-poisoning-ideas-eu

[–] LH0ezVT@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Oh, definitively not. I'm not even 30, and I remember that NY dad's car from when I was a kid needed a special additive to replace the lead, because that had been banned since he bought it

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

I'm referring more to lead pipes eg Flint, Michigan. USA has really old infrastructure, and from what little I know, GOP state governments aren't big on fixing those sort of problems.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The rest of the world too. Americans are just louder and prouder about stupidity.

[–] Ironfist79@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That is objectively false. Other countries are far more educated.

[–] Bytemeister@lemmy.world -1 points 2 days ago

Don't mistake education for intelligence.

Trump has a degree from Wharton.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Oh no! I guess they'll have to get their cheap Chinese knock-off crap from Good American Sources.

Seriously though, even if the tariffs were reduced pre-loony-President levels tomorrow, no-one's gonna trust that being permanent.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Actually with this really cheap Chinese stuff it will often still be cheaper than another source.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 22 hours ago

Oh? Well that's ok then :)

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

145% isn't even accurate because that's just on the cost of the good. You then have to figure in retailer margin, seller margin etc. Most MSRPs will be 300% of what they were to keep those the same as before.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 0 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Not really. If they keep the same % based on what it costs them, then it should increase by the same amount.

If they instead get the same amount (which would effectively mean reduce their margins) the final cost would be a bit less.

Happy to be corrected with some numerical example.

So if you see any price increase greater than the tariff amount, it's plain corporate greed.

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

BS If an item costs an extra $100 to put on a shelf, the retailer will still want to cover the costs of obtaining and spending that $100. No-one is going to use funds commercially, for free. WTF do you think retailers will be good keeping the same profit, numerically, whilst spending 145% more for it?

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I always wonder what compels some people to make so little effort to understand what they are replying to, but make so much effort in proving they have no idea what they are replying to. Can you explain?

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 1 points 14 hours ago

Obviously, you already know the answer.
Personally, I've always laughed at people who posit questions that they already know the answer to. Faux Intelligentsia.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Less if anything.

You buy something from China for $100. Add packing, staff costs and delivery and you sell it retail for say $200. A nice healthy profit margin.

Now you add the 145%, so it costs $245 from China. None of the rest of it will cost you more. Still an extra $100, for $345 total.

The retail customer pays an extra (345/200=) 72.5% instead.

It's a lot, but not 145%.

So if your retail price goes up by 145% or more, they either weren't making a lot of profit before, or they're greedy bastards.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At the border you pay tariffs on all the costs up to that point, because they are all considered to be part of the value of the shipment as it crosses the border. So the price of good, plus the price of packaging (as far as it was packaged in China), plus the price of the freight shipping are tariffed together, which makes the result of the calculation a little worse, but fundamentally you're right.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It depends on if it is something like a powder that comes raw in a 200 lb jar and you package it yourself into small containers.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yes, then you only pay tariff for the powder, for the big jar, and the transpacific shipping of the big jar. That's what I meant by "as far as it was packaged in China".

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

Yes, I was agreeing with you. But especially to say that the bulk powder from China can be incredibly cheap, so for a lot of goods the 20$ bottle won't be affected that much by tariffs even if they're at 150%. It's the type of thing with a lot of goods where you can look it up and the bulk amount is cheap but then you have to deal with an entire pallet of something you only need like 5 times ever. So buying the small relatively expensive bottle is still better, and with a wild guess it could only be like 1-4 dollars per bottle more.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think "corporate greed" is a good explanation for pretty much all our problems.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Given the effect on the climate due to pollution, even rain or lack of can be explained by corporate greed

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

i hope every fucking 3rd party voter has to choose between rent and eating along with all the pridefully ignorant bumblefuck maga knuckledraggers

edit: LOL i love how the "vOtE 3rD pArTy!!!!" chuds have literally nothing to say anymore--can only downvote.

"i DoNt WaNnA vOtE fOr GeNoCiDe!!!!"

great job, fucko. now we have genocide in gaza AND in america

enjoy your fucking tariffs. and if you're less than 100% white/male/straight/evangelical/republican, then enjoy all the things that go along with being "other" in a fascist state (hint: fucking genocide)

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 0 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"I know I support the murder of you and your people. But I'm still going to need you to vote for me, so that I can preserve democracy and the economy. You may not live to see it, but the rest of us will really appreciate it."

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

Gonna be honest with you. I care way more about the nation I live in and its democracy and my human rights and the human rights of the ones I love than I do about two nations on the other side of the planet continuing a fucking holy war that's been going on all my life.

Apparently you do not.

P.S. Gaza is worse off under Trump. And he made it clear that would be the case before the election.