this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)

News

33348 readers
19 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cosmicrookie@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

What people in the US also need to realize is, that the rest of the world still enjoys more or less unchanged prices on these sites. It is only the US that has put tarrifs on them and it has only affected the American consumers

On the other hand, American products are getting more expensive everywhere else, because of the retaliational tarrifs by the usa.

So it is a double edged sword, but the US is holding it by it's blade! With both hands!

[–] AcidicBasicGlitch@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

The US is screaming and holding a hot pan fresh out of the oven, but refusing to just set it down and use the fucking oven mits next time.

Meanwhile, other countries are watching this happen, but somehow having a relatively difficult time deciding if they maybe want to give it a try with their own government.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] leadore@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

One mistake Temu is making is showing it as "Import fees". That's correct of course, but they should label it specifically as "Import tariffs" or "Tariffs", so that it's clear what this is. From the comments in the linked reddit threads, a lot of people just think they're extra fees Temu is voluntarily putting on as retaliation, their brains still aren't making the link between "import fees" and "trump's tariffs on China".

[–] CosmicTurtle0@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

There are some brave businesses around here that have started posting signs.

"Due to tariffs, we've had to raise our prices."

[–] turtlesareneat@discuss.online 1 points 7 months ago

I'm in the Deep South, I bet by end of week I see a place charging "Fuck China" surcharges.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

Definitely needs to be "Trump's tariff" to be clear.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hdnsmbt@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

A Lemmy post about an article about a Reddit post. The internet feels more and more incestuous every day.

[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] opus86@lemmy.today 1 points 7 months ago

I wish I was in a place were I had no idea what was going on. I'm just twitching when I think about Republicans sending people to concentration camps with out charges or trial. That just means everyone is just sheep to be plucked. We are now just living on luck.

[–] solsangraal@lemmy.zip 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

i hope every fucking 3rd party voter has to choose between rent and eating along with all the pridefully ignorant bumblefuck maga knuckledraggers

edit: LOL i love how the "vOtE 3rD pArTy!!!!" chuds have literally nothing to say anymore--can only downvote.

"i DoNt WaNnA vOtE fOr GeNoCiDe!!!!"

great job, fucko. now we have genocide in gaza AND in america

enjoy your fucking tariffs. and if you're less than 100% white/male/straight/evangelical/republican, then enjoy all the things that go along with being "other" in a fascist state (hint: fucking genocide)

[–] WoodScientist@sh.itjust.works 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

"I know I support the murder of you and your people. But I'm still going to need you to vote for me, so that I can preserve democracy and the economy. You may not live to see it, but the rest of us will really appreciate it."

[–] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Gonna be honest with you. I care way more about the nation I live in and its democracy and my human rights and the human rights of the ones I love than I do about two nations on the other side of the planet continuing a fucking holy war that's been going on all my life.

Apparently you do not.

P.S. Gaza is worse off under Trump. And he made it clear that would be the case before the election.

[–] psycho_driver@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

145% isn't even accurate because that's just on the cost of the good. You then have to figure in retailer margin, seller margin etc. Most MSRPs will be 300% of what they were to keep those the same as before.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 0 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Not really. If they keep the same % based on what it costs them, then it should increase by the same amount.

If they instead get the same amount (which would effectively mean reduce their margins) the final cost would be a bit less.

Happy to be corrected with some numerical example.

So if you see any price increase greater than the tariff amount, it's plain corporate greed.

[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Less if anything.

You buy something from China for $100. Add packing, staff costs and delivery and you sell it retail for say $200. A nice healthy profit margin.

Now you add the 145%, so it costs $245 from China. None of the rest of it will cost you more. Still an extra $100, for $345 total.

The retail customer pays an extra (345/200=) 72.5% instead.

It's a lot, but not 145%.

So if your retail price goes up by 145% or more, they either weren't making a lot of profit before, or they're greedy bastards.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

At the border you pay tariffs on all the costs up to that point, because they are all considered to be part of the value of the shipment as it crosses the border. So the price of good, plus the price of packaging (as far as it was packaged in China), plus the price of the freight shipping are tariffed together, which makes the result of the calculation a little worse, but fundamentally you're right.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It depends on if it is something like a powder that comes raw in a 200 lb jar and you package it yourself into small containers.

[–] Kazumara@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yes, then you only pay tariff for the powder, for the big jar, and the transpacific shipping of the big jar. That's what I meant by "as far as it was packaged in China".

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 1 points 7 months ago

Yes, I was agreeing with you. But especially to say that the bulk powder from China can be incredibly cheap, so for a lot of goods the 20$ bottle won't be affected that much by tariffs even if they're at 150%. It's the type of thing with a lot of goods where you can look it up and the bulk amount is cheap but then you have to deal with an entire pallet of something you only need like 5 times ever. So buying the small relatively expensive bottle is still better, and with a wild guess it could only be like 1-4 dollars per bottle more.

[–] Jumpingspiderman@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I think "corporate greed" is a good explanation for pretty much all our problems.

[–] Railcar8095@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago

Given the effect on the climate due to pollution, even rain or lack of can be explained by corporate greed

[–] drhodl@lemmy.world 0 points 7 months ago (2 children)

BS If an item costs an extra $100 to put on a shelf, the retailer will still want to cover the costs of obtaining and spending that $100. No-one is going to use funds commercially, for free. WTF do you think retailers will be good keeping the same profit, numerically, whilst spending 145% more for it?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 0 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Oh no! I guess they'll have to get their cheap Chinese knock-off crap from Good American Sources.

Seriously though, even if the tariffs were reduced pre-loony-President levels tomorrow, no-one's gonna trust that being permanent.

[–] MDCCCLV@lemmy.ca 0 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Actually with this really cheap Chinese stuff it will often still be cheaper than another source.

[–] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 7 months ago

Oh? Well that's ok then :)

load more comments
view more: next ›