It is kind of funny that Iran already replaced Khomeini with another Khomeini. Except this one is extra shitty, and now also extra pissed off too.
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF OCTOBER 19 2025
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News !news@lemmy.world
Politics !politics@lemmy.world
World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
Khamenei. Khomeini was another dude, replaced by Khamenei. Then Khamenei was killed and was replaced by Khamenei Jr.
Are all those actually different names, and not just varying latin alphabet transliterations of the same farsi word?
Yes, the first one was a different family, unrelated to the second and third, who are father and son.
Ruhollah Khomeini روحالله خمینی
Ali Khamenei علي خامنهاى
So it's not just a difference in transliteration. I don't know any Arabic language or script at all, so I don't know how different those are. (Also, remember that these should be read right-to-left.)
I don't know the language at all but I can "read" the script, and they are quite different. The first one is like "Khomenee", the second is like "Khaamenae'i"
Do you think they're variations on the same name?
No idea :) I'm not familiar enough with the Iranian/Persian culture to even make a guess.
Tell me you are american without telling me you're american. Plot twist: I am american too.
You think I'm American because -- checks notes -- I care about getting names and relationships right and understand that there isn't necessarily a 1:1 relationship between what a name actually is in its native language and what it looks like written in English?
I am American, but I don't understand why you apparently think that's a common characteristic of us or why you want to give me an angry backhanded compliment about it.
No. It's cos not knowing about other countries, their politicians or their names. People abroad know many american politicians, but americans know few, if any, foreign politicians.
And in your response, this is not something you even consider as being the thing that tells on you. Me, I became american the other day, so I've been doing the other thing.
The fuck?
You never heard about last names? Or are you just Jimbob?
Also, I believe Ayatollah Zwehevidi and his cadre of fanatics are consolidating their power...
Only funny if their first and only target is Mar A Lago.
The whole goal is to destroy their military capabilities so Israel can do whatever they want unopposed.
Trump's code name should be Blunt Knife because he's about as useful as one.
We call people like that "bull tits".
"That boy's about as useful as tits on a bull."
I suggest Cancerous Anal Fissure.
Why? Well a blunt knife can be useful for something. A screwdriver maybe, or spreading butter, or a way to practice juggling knives in a safe manner.
However no one wants a cancerous anal fissure. And it can't be used for anything productive.
The one you could use where I am from is "one hand clap"
Just as effective as clapping with one hand.

But of course Trump and his Merry Men knew better than the unmatched intelligence and military apparatus they have around to call upon.
Why do the press think they wanted regime change? It's iran. It's their dream just to blow the place up.
Man, that would really bum out Trump if he could read his briefings.
I see that Trump & Co. are vibe warring again.
Krasnov trusts the GRU and the FSB over his own CIA and ODNI. Of course this doesn't matter.
They changed leadership. It’s basically the same guy, just his son. The exact same flavor of religious crazy, just younger.
This analysis is useless
That's not what "change in leadership" means; it means different governments with different agendas coming into power. That will not happen as a result of this war.
That is however exactly what Donald Trump said leadership change in Venezuela meant.
Very different situations. Maduro was dictator of a relatively smaller nation that would not be the same without him there, while Iran is larger, more powerful, and has a leadership structure less dependent on one person. Even then, kidnapping Maduro does not mean his more pro US replacement is a reliable ally. She could be overthrown and is limited in how much she can help them.
You think Donald Trump is capable of any of this sort of nuance? Really?
He understands: Maduro weak, Iran not quite as weak. He just goes along with Israel's plans because he appreciates how they kill brown people. Maduro was deposed because Venezuela was an easy target to show strength against. It accomplished nothing for the US just like the current war, but Trump never gave a shit about US interests.
All the more reason for him to declare regime change accomplished and victory then no? To say regime change is the guy at the top only, as he did before.
Nah, he doesn't need to claim regime change because he can honestly declare victory far easier. Unlike most other efforts in the middle east, they actually are trying to accomplish something achievable: decimating Iran's military to set them back several years and limit their danger in the near future. It's not worth the cost and accomplishes little in the long run, but it is far more realistic than nation building or anything similar the US has tried.