this post was submitted on 02 Apr 2026
567 points (97.3% liked)

Technology

84816 readers
4027 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] IAmNorRealTakeYourMeds@lemmy.world 250 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 63 points 1 month ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de 208 points 1 month ago (11 children)

Please everyone read or at least skim articles before posting. The article literally says, that it's "an honest bump" to allow typical usage like web browsing and multitasking.

Ubuntu experts at OMG Ubuntu characterize the latest revision in RAM specs as “an honesty bump.” In other words, the core OS isn’t really more demanding on system resources this time around, but Canonical recognizes that with the latest Gnome desktop, modern web browsers, and typical multitasking workflows, users should look at a minimum of 6GB of RAM.

[–] NauticalNoodle@lemmy.ml 96 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Please everyone read or at least skim articles before posting.

NEVER!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] pirate2377@lemmy.zip 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But that requires actually READING 😖 /j

[–] Black616Angel@discuss.tchncs.de 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Siegfried@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Web browsing is the real murder here.. and i dont want to know how much memory is solely spent on ads

[–] grinde@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 month ago

The week after GDPR went into effect was amazing. Almost nobody was ready, so they just turned off all their ads and tracking for European IPs while they figured it out. Pages loaded pretty much instantly.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] XLE@piefed.social 14 points 1 month ago

I'm concerned about in-system bloat because I read the linked article.

Rather, it’s more of an honesty bump. Components that make up the distro – the GNOME desktop and extensions, modern web browsers (and the sites we load in them) and the kinds of apps we use (and keep running) whilst multitasking are more demanding.

The desktop itself isn't the only reason that you need more RAM, but it's definitely one of them.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] fartsparkles@lemmy.world 121 points 1 month ago (8 children)

They’re raising it because of RAM needs of browsers and GNOME.

If you’re a shell nerd like me, you’ll still be fine running it on a potato.

[–] XLE@piefed.social 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

It's an illuminating experience to go to a store with Apple computers with 8GB of RAM on display, and browse to a RAM-heavy unoptimized website like YouTube or even Reddit now.

Open a few tabs.
Open a dozen.
You'd be surprised what a decently coded OS can pull off without compromising on the visuals.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jeffep@lemmy.world 76 points 1 month ago (26 children)

Great move in these times where RAM is cheap and widely available

[–] rumba@lemmy.zip 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Canonical has never been accused of being able to read the room.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (24 replies)
[–] IrateAnteater@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I don't immediately hate it. It's been a while since any laptops/prebuilds shipped with less than 8 GB, and there's distros out there far better suited to running on low power or legacy hardware.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fallaciousBasis@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago

So basically the system requirements of Chrome.

[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world 49 points 1 month ago

In this economy?

[–] Paranoidfactoid@lemmy.world 46 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

"HERE'S A NICKLE, KID. GET YOURSELF A BETTER COMPUTER."

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 month ago

20 years ago when Scott Adams was still a moderately sane human.

[–] sturmblast@lemmy.world 34 points 1 month ago (6 children)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Blackmist@feddit.uk 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's pretty much what a browser needs these days.

[–] forkDestroyer@infosec.pub 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Reject modernity. Embrace lynx browser from terminal.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] abacabadabacaba@infosec.pub 21 points 1 month ago (7 children)
[–] CaptDust@sh.itjust.works 44 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Wow those min specs are pure bullshit. Sure you can run the OS - oh, did you want to do anything else with your PC? Good luck

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] nooneescapesthelaw@mander.xyz 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Me with 16 GB on my computer

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] umbraroze@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Fun thing, I just booted up an old computer. Started right up. It had Ubuntu 11.10 on it.

Now, I obviously didn't connect the thing to the Internet. Updates would have probably failed hard. Not because it's missing over a decade of updates so there might be some complications on that front, but because it's a Pentium III with Definitely Not Even a Gigabyte of memory. (Oh and a Nvidia GeForce 2 MX. I'm pretty sure that's not supported by... any driver any more.)

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] T156@lemmy.world 19 points 1 month ago (10 children)

This doesn't seem so bad, though. 2 GB more in about 10 years is pretty reasonable in terms of an increase.

It's not like they doubled it.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] bold_omi@lemmy.today 19 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Use Debian if you want a system like Ubuntu that isn't full of Canonical's corporate shit. Ubuntu is based on Debian.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] moxymarauder@thelemmy.club 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder how much of this is just modern web apps... even running without a containerized distro and a leaner DE - I still have +90% of my RAM taken up by websites.

[–] aesthelete@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Modern UI development is such fucking shit. I have no idea why they went with all of these heavyweight shit frameworks.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Taleya@aussie.zone 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Shocked i got this far without someone blaming snaps

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] elbiter@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago
  1. Everything is a framework under a framework running on a pseudo virtual machine. 6 GB are just for the notepad and the mouse driver.
[–] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

When I built my current rig a few years back (when I still used Windows and Photoshop), I said, "RAM is cheap enough, and more is better, but don't go overboard."

That's how I ended up with 64GB of RAM.

[–] OctopusNemeses@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

8GB was barely enough 10 years ago. That's when I switched to Arch+KDE. Then KDE started using more. memory.

[–] hornedfiend@sopuli.xyz 18 points 1 month ago (4 children)

More memory meaning? From 800Mb to 1GB? I'd say, for what plasma is, its ram usage is low.

[–] moxymarauder@thelemmy.club 13 points 1 month ago

agreed. KDE is pretty much the gold standard of the usability versus resource usage tradeoff, IMHO. From what I've seen: Websites/Web Browsers = worst offenders.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I'm ok with this - lubuntu has my back.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›