Black616Angel

Wow, you are unable to even read the post you reply under.
They said that they don't know, what terms to use for their search.

libpid

🤣

Don't jinx it!

Maybe even an arm~~or~~ed car.

Malus uses two AIs for that. One creates a spec and the other implements that spec.

But that doesn't even work, because you would have to prove that the original software was not part of the training set. And with it being an LLM from a big corporation, that chance is close to zero.

Correct.

🔻

Downvoted, textwall!

/j

The theoretically is load bearing here. Also China themselves massively build their solar, so it being built using coal is not quite right. Also also other countries were able to build solar before so theoretically they could do so again if sufficiently subsidized.

Please everyone read or at least skim articles before posting. The article literally says, that it's "an honest bump" to allow typical usage like web browsing and multitasking.

Ubuntu experts at OMG Ubuntu characterize the latest revision in RAM specs as “an honesty bump.” In other words, the core OS isn’t really more demanding on system resources this time around, but Canonical recognizes that with the latest Gnome desktop, modern web browsers, and typical multitasking workflows, users should look at a minimum of 6GB of RAM.

Okay, I have never heard of using coal plants for nuclear and found nothing online. Do you have some sources for me?

And yes, I get the rest, but I would prefer to not use nuclear, but given the current development, I'd prefer going full nuclear over whatever the fuck a lot of countries are doing right now.

Okay. That is true.

Still I think going back to nuclear is not a great idea. It still relies on fishy countries and is not renewable, takes ages to build and harms the environment through the emitted heat especially in summer (and other problems).

That said, I still massively prefer it to coal and gas. Its not even remotely close.